Controversial General Political Discussion

[NAMELESS]

What if the woman is written to be awful? Examples would be Dee Reynolds from It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia and Shiv Roy from Succession. A good test is see how people compare the male characters of that show to the female characters. Are people more like to excuse the male characters while degrading the women characters?

Rachel of Tower of God is a great example of an evil character done right. 99.9% of the fandom hates her, she is supposed to be hated. A great character.

 

[Uncle Van]

Rachel of Tower of God is a great example of an evil character done right. 99.9% of the fandom hates her, she is supposed to be hated. A great character.

Oh yeah that stupid dumbass bitch. I actually erased her from my mind lmao.

 

[Logiko]

Lol just trying to give you a heads up in case you fall for his tactics and get really annoyed. He really plays moral gymnastics to insinuate you're a bad person whenever you disagree with him, as he's the representative of everything that is morally just(I'm not being funny here). We've had plenty of people discuss respectfully with him only to have their character and morals degraded and get heated.

He views his personal opinions as facts, or doesn't understand the difference between the two.

Lmao You really can't take a critic.

(For context, Van didn't like the fact that I called him out for not moderating toxic and transphobic content, spreading racist theories, and the fact that I'm calling out the system of worstgen that promotes negative and the inculture of the staff in term of oppressive rethorics... So he is now using the fact that I once called out some racist bias of people against oppressed characters in One Piece as a way to discredit my words.)

It's ok bebou, you will survive, I'm almost gone.

 

[Roo]

Personnally, when I see a badly written woman, I'm not trashing the character, but the author.

the character doesn't exist, why cant you do both?

for ex I trash both Oda and Kaido lol

 

[NAMELESS]

Oh yeah that stupid dumbass bitch. I actually erased her from my mind lmao.

wait, you a TOG reader?

 

[Uncle Van]

Lmao You really can't take a critic.

(For context, Van didn't like the fact that I called him out for not moderating toxic and transphobic content, spreading racist theories, and the fact that I'm calling out the system of worstgen that promotes negative and the inculture of the staff in term of oppressive rethorics... So he is now using the fact that I once called out some racist bias of people against oppressed characters in One Piece as a way to discredit my words.)

It's ok bebou, you will survive, I'm almost gone.

I get called an uncle tom 24/7 out in the real world. You think I'm shaken by an authoritarian on a weeb forum? Lmao

 

[Ravagerblade]

This has got to be one of the most extremely flawed ways to interact with and view humans I've ever heard off. Guess we gotta watch out for every single person who plays GTA.

We have to remember, he's extremely delusional about reality.

 

[Logiko]

I get called an uncle tom 24/7 out in the real world. You think I'm shaken by an authoritarian on a weeb forum? Lmao

"authoritarian" lmao
You are just ragebaiting at this point.

 

[Ravagerblade]

It’s ok if you don’t know the shows. Dee Reynolds and Shiv Roy are amazingly written. They’re just awful human beings!

Id hate to see his opinion on Azula.

 

[Uncle Van]

wait, you a TOG reader?

I'm NOT caught up if that's what you think. Nowhere close lol. Out of like 650 chapters, I'm only like 180 chapters in. Already hate Rachel and apparently, she gets worse.

"authoritarian" lmao
You are just ragebaiting at this point.

Nope. You objectively, by defintion, have authoritarian tendencies.

 

[Logiko]

Id hate to see his opinion on Azula.

I love Azula as a character.

Nope. You objectively, by defintion, have authoritarian tendencies.

Sure Mate. You clearly understand politics.

 

[Uncle Van]

I love Azula as a character.


Sure Mate. You clearly understand politics.

Given how often you agree with me, praise me, and then later use my talking points, you seen to highly value them. Don't switch up on me now you tsundere. It's already been booked lol

 

[Logiko]

Given how often you agree with me, praise me, and then later use my talking points, you seen to highly value them. Don't switch up on me now you tsundere. It's already been booked lol

I respect your historical knowledge. Not your political awereness.

You are as aware of leftist and materialistic praxis as Luffy is aware of archeology.

 

[Uncle Van]

I respect your historical knowledge. Not your political awereness.

You are as aware of leftist praxis as Luffy is aware of archeology.

You agreed with my talking points on that too!

 

[Logiko]

You agreed with my talking points on that too!

Nah lmao. I agreed with BASIC things.

There is a lot more that we do not have in common at the moment mate. And those are the reasons why you think me calling out toxicity and trying to create a positive space through the restructuration of the forum is an authoritarian behavior.

 

[Roo]

I get called an uncle tom 24/7 out in the real world. You think I'm shaken by an authoritarian on a weeb forum? Lmao

damn why tf lol.

 

[Uncle Van]

Nah lmao. I agreed with BASIC things.

"No I don't agree with you. I agree with you sometimes."

So you agree. I've mentioned plenty of times the absolutely necessity of radical leftism, and how freedom, equality and liberty are inherently left wing Ideals, something you disagreed with lol.

damn why tf lol.

Black cop in the ghetto. At this rate I'll turn into Stinkmeaner lol

 

[NAMELESS]

"No I don't agree with you. I agree with you sometimes."

So you agree. I've mentioned plenty of times the absolutely necessity of radical leftism, and how freedom, equality and liberty are inherently left wing Ideals, something you disagreed with lol.


Black cop in the ghetto. At this rate I'll turn into Stinkmeaner lol

Once you join the SWAT team, nobody will dare talk like that to you.

 

[Logiko]

"No I don't agree with you. I agree with you sometimes."

Sometime, you will understand the real meaning of nuance.

So you agree. I've mentioned plenty of times the absolutely necessity of radical leftism, and how freedom, equality and liberty are inherently left wing Ideals, something you disagreed with lol.

Yup you did.

And you have someone doing EXACTLY that at the moment and you are calling me out for exactly that. Which show me that while you have a form of historical knowledge, your political awereness needs some work.

And the reason you need to understand that leftism is not about freedom and equality (or at least not really), but liberation and equity. The reason why i'm making the distinction is because what you described is not leftism but progressive liberalism, things that do not take systems of oppressions into account. Radical Leftism (which is really leftism) is opposed to universalism.

 

[Uncle Van]

Sometime, you will understand the real meaning of nuance.



Yup you did.

And you have someone doing EXACTLY that at the moment and you are calling me out for exactly that. Which show me that while you have a form of historical knowledge, your political awereness needs some work.

And the reason you need to understand that leftism is not about freedom and equality (or at least not really), but liberation and equity. The reason why i'm making the distinction is because what you described is not leftism but progressive liberalism, things that do not take systems of oppressions into account. Radical Leftism (which is really leftism) is opposed to universalism.

I refuse to ignore history and definitions, along with making them up, to appease my personal sense of justice and entitlement. I also refuse to enforce my personal sense of right and wrong on other people for no one's sake but my own.