Doesn't matter. His mindset is that anyone who says anything he disagrees with doesn't understand the story and disrespects women in real life. Some time ago, he was so obsessed with the idea of Carrot being a SH that he claimed it was so clear and obvious, that anyone who doesn't agree must be sexist and misogynists for "being young men undermining a young girl's abilities". Carrot came nowhere close to joining and he tried blaming Oda for not understanding the character, yet he still tries to scold people for being disappointed about aspects of One Piece.
There is a reason I stay away from any discourse discussing the next nakama. It gets very toxic and I personally feel like we don’t need any more nakama because Oda has just flanderized the strawhats now.
 
It’s ok if you don’t know the shows. Dee Reynolds and Shiv Roy are amazingly written. They’re just awful human beings!
I see where you are coming from. Yeah, in that case, I can "understand" the insults (even if I personnally prevent myself from saying them).

I'm mainly talking here about people calling genuinly good and nice character trash for no reasons other than the character not following their expectations.

that anyone who doesn't agree must be sexist and misogynists for "being young men undermining a young girl's abilities".
The way you hold on to that lie is both funny and pathetic now lmao.

I will not even try to debunk it, i've done it so many times already. You are really earning your place on your current side of the political spectrum. it's crazy.

:shocking:

There is a reason I stay away from any discourse discussing the next nakama. It gets very toxic and I personally feel like we don’t need any more nakama because Oda has just flanderized the strawhats now.
Don't listen to this guy, every thing he said here is false lmao. He is just conveniently extrapoling things I did indeed say to make up his false narrative.

As lon as you don't trash a character for no reason, there is no problems.
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
There is a reason I stay away from any discourse discussing the next nakama. It gets very toxic and I personally feel like we don’t need any more nakama because Oda has just flanderized the strawhats now.
Lol just trying to give you a heads up in case you fall for his tactics and get really annoyed. He really plays moral gymnastics to insinuate you're a bad person whenever you disagree with him, as he's the representative of everything that is morally just(I'm not being funny here). We've had plenty of people discuss respectfully with him only to have their character and morals degraded and get heated.

He views his personal opinions as facts, or doesn't understand the difference between the two.
 
What if the woman is written to be awful? Examples would be Dee Reynolds from It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia and Shiv Roy from Succession. A good test is see how people compare the male characters of that show to the female characters. Are people more like to excuse the male characters while degrading the women characters?
Rachel of Tower of God is a great example of an evil character done right. 99.9% of the fandom hates her, she is supposed to be hated. A great character.
 
Lol just trying to give you a heads up in case you fall for his tactics and get really annoyed. He really plays moral gymnastics to insinuate you're a bad person whenever you disagree with him, as he's the representative of everything that is morally just(I'm not being funny here). We've had plenty of people discuss respectfully with him only to have their character and morals degraded and get heated.

He views his personal opinions as facts, or doesn't understand the difference between the two.
Lmao You really can't take a critic.

(For context, Van didn't like the fact that I called him out for not moderating toxic and transphobic content, spreading racist theories, and the fact that I'm calling out the system of worstgen that promotes negative and the inculture of the staff in term of oppressive rethorics... So he is now using the fact that I once called out some racist bias of people against oppressed characters in One Piece as a way to discredit my words.)

It's ok bebou, you will survive, I'm almost gone.
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
Lmao You really can't take a critic.

(For context, Van didn't like the fact that I called him out for not moderating toxic and transphobic content, spreading racist theories, and the fact that I'm calling out the system of worstgen that promotes negative and the inculture of the staff in term of oppressive rethorics... So he is now using the fact that I once called out some racist bias of people against oppressed characters in One Piece as a way to discredit my words.)

It's ok bebou, you will survive, I'm almost gone.
I get called an uncle tom 24/7 out in the real world. You think I'm shaken by an authoritarian on a weeb forum? Lmao
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
wait, you a TOG reader?
I'm NOT caught up if that's what you think. Nowhere close lol. Out of like 650 chapters, I'm only like 180 chapters in. Already hate Rachel and apparently, she gets worse.

"authoritarian" lmao
You are just ragebaiting at this point.
Nope. You objectively, by defintion, have authoritarian tendencies.
 
Given how often you agree with me, praise me, and then later use my talking points, you seen to highly value them. Don't switch up on me now you tsundere. It's already been booked lol
I respect your historical knowledge. Not your political awereness.

You are as aware of leftist and materialistic praxis as Luffy is aware of archeology.
 
You agreed with my talking points on that too! :gokulaugh:
Nah lmao. I agreed with BASIC things.

There is a lot more that we do not have in common at the moment mate. And those are the reasons why you think me calling out toxicity and trying to create a positive space through the restructuration of the forum is an authoritarian behavior.

:shocking:
 
Top