Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Not as stupid as people who think this can be handled in a court of law…but the thought that killing a CEO who’s responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths is indefensible but someone like Kyle Rittenhouse gunning down peaceful protesters in the streets is all right is the most asinine thing I can think of, so tell me you condemn him as well or I’ll dismiss your insulting comment as totally useless like I usually do 
Not as stupid as people who think this can be handled in a court of law…but the thought that killing a CEO who’s responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths is indefensible but someone like Kyle Rittenhouse gunning down peaceful protesters in the streets is all right is the most asinine thing I can think of, so tell me you condemn him as well or I’ll dismiss your insulting comment as totally useless like I usually do
It's amazing to see how I'm constantly the one being called an authoritarian and the reason why people become reactionnaries when I see how you and Nameless treats people here...
It's also funny how people in power keep telling to everyone how it is always radical leftists who are the reason for the creation of far rightists but never that far rightists are the reason for the creation of people like me.
It's also funny how people in power keep telling to everyone how it is always radical leftists who are the reason for the creation of far rightists but never that far rightists are the reason for the creation of people like me.
Show me the proof on that, I’ve never heard it before but I’m disinclined to take your word on anything…also, what a surprise, more mental gymnastics to explain why bad things are actually good when they’re done by someone on your side 
If I have the correct place, if need be I could look more into it.
https://www.wisconsinrightnow.com/joseph-rosenbaum-sex-offender/?amp=1
First of all, you better stop that shit right now, I don’t support pedophilia at all and you can get in real trouble if you try that in real life (which you won’t, we both know you’re a coward outside of this place)…second, good, I’m glad that dude is dead, but what about the other person Rittenhouse murdered? What about the guy in Charlottesville who ran his car into a crowd of protesters and killed a woman? What about the dozens - hundreds! - of Republican senators/teachers/cops who are also child molesters? I just posted a link yesterday regarding ANOTHER conservative soliciting sex from a minor, you wanna condemn that or are you burying your fucking head in the sand again, you hypocritical twat??
You project a fucking lot. Those are your people, your homies, Don't like it, I don't give a fuck.
You are so quick to blame only one side and ignore a lot of his own side. Haha
Mark Ruffalo even called him "Jojo" haha
Triggered are we? Hahaha
You got proven wrong and this is how you act.
A piece of shit. Good job.
You are so quick to blame only one side and ignore a lot of his own side. Haha
Mark Ruffalo even called him "Jojo" haha
Triggered are we? Hahaha
You got proven wrong and this is how you act.
A piece of shit. Good job.
Have you read him ?
I find it amusing too how Americans ( I guess ) are pulling arguments from 2500years ago when Egypt still had pharaohs to say that they’d rather have Erdogan over Imamoglu while asking : why is Turkey in NATO because of it being hardly any democratic anymore ? But then doing another contradiction because if you are in charge of the country then who cares ? Because this is exactly what you say when you bring up « Erdogan is better for the interests of Turkey than EU leaders » which is such a silly sophistic argument. Maybe EU leaders have their own countries too ? I mean what is that even supposed to mean ?
I find it amusing too how Americans ( I guess ) are pulling arguments from 2500years ago when Egypt still had pharaohs to say that they’d rather have Erdogan over Imamoglu while asking : why is Turkey in NATO because of it being hardly any democratic anymore ? But then doing another contradiction because if you are in charge of the country then who cares ? Because this is exactly what you say when you bring up « Erdogan is better for the interests of Turkey than EU leaders » which is such a silly sophistic argument. Maybe EU leaders have their own countries too ? I mean what is that even supposed to mean ?