Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Are you retarded? I said excessive bureocracy. Workers rights need to be a thing to avoid stuff like slave and children work, but what we have here right now is insanity.
Work relations are not charity. Who would work 40 hours a week to literally have no financial return by the end of the month? Profit is what keeps businesses running.
Work relations are not charity. Who would work 40 hours a week to literally have no financial return by the end of the month? Profit is what keeps businesses running.
No profit, no business. No business, no work. I'm going to flip this to you: Are you in favor of unemployment? Do you want to have an economic environment where the creation of jobs is NOT stimulated? Good intentions can also lead to hell. You left guys have the most BEAUTIFUL and yet IMPRACTICAL ideas. History proves my points. Nobody wants to do business in Brazil. All thanks to our legislation.
Down here, what we have now is to prevent PROSPERITY AND CREATE A NATION OF PEOPLE THAT ARE SLAVES TO SOCIAL BENEFITS. Welfare state is the biggest electoral scam of modernity.
I have all of you on ignore, but i can't help myself to read this shit from time to time. It's hilarious.
Post automatically merged:
Down here, what we have now is to prevent PROSPERITY AND CREATE A NATION OF PEOPLE THAT ARE SLAVES TO SOCIAL BENEFITS. Welfare state is the biggest electoral scam of modernity.
None of this proves your point. Trickledown economics is what got rid of the most prosperous era in America, You'd know this if you actually believed in peer reviewed research, but we all know you don't read. Profit motive undeniably created progress at a certain time, but by all metrics now, its creating economic stagnation for 90% of the people.
You are not educated enough to make a real argument here. You can deny that unions, regulation and wealth distribution is something bad for the economy. But historically speaking, the era of social democracy during and after WW2 was what created the richest economy the world has ever seen.
You're more than welcome to disagree and spout your nonsense. But I think I speak for everyone when I say to please spare us with your false sense of morality. You are an individualistic anarcho-capitalist. Not interested in fair wages and reducing inequality. You believe in the law of the jungle, and you're more than happy to show contempt for those who do care.
You are not educated enough to make a real argument here. You can deny that unions, regulation and wealth distribution is something bad for the economy. But historically speaking, the era of social democracy during and after WW2 was what created the richest economy the world has ever seen.
You're more than welcome to disagree and spout your nonsense. But I think I speak for everyone when I say to please spare us with your false sense of morality. You are an individualistic anarcho-capitalist. Not interested in fair wages and reducing inequality. You believe in the law of the jungle, and you're more than happy to show contempt for those who do care.
Without these billionaires, wouldn't smaller businesses, more local, community-based businesses, fill in the void
Society would adapt to the absence of corporate economic monopolization
Also, none of this changes the fact that billionaires shouldn't exist in the first place, and don't even use a fraction of the power they possess to purposely benefit society
Society would adapt to the absence of corporate economic monopolization
Also, none of this changes the fact that billionaires shouldn't exist in the first place, and don't even use a fraction of the power they possess to purposely benefit society
Of course, you can't just have a normal conversation; you have to get on a high horse and pretend you are so much better than me because you care about workers' rights and all that jazz. You say I'm insensitive and egotistical. I don't give a shit what you think of me. I know for a fact both you and logiko are envious narcissists that only believe the shit you say you believe because you hate your position on the social hierarchy. You have admitted to coming in here to bully people in the past. You have also admitted to having narcissistic tendencies. You are an asshole, and you don't make any effort to hide it, so please, do us both a favor and get off this high horse. Don't get me wrong, i'm also an asshole, but i don't go around pretending i care about shit that i don't for validation. All this virtue signaling makes you look like an attention starved adolescent. You are the last guy in here that should preach to anyone about morals. You do all this preaching to feed your ego. Touch grass and keep going to therapy.
Candle makers bitching about eletricity all over again.
Can a small local business provide the necessary logistics to mass produce all the shit we need? NO. There is your answer. Billionaires rich cause they solve complex and big puzzles.
Post automatically merged:
Candle makers bitching about eletricity all over again.
Post automatically merged:
Can a small local business provide the necessary logistics to mass produce all the shit we need? NO. There is your answer. Billionaires rich cause they solve complex and big puzzles.
By the way, Europeans only really made a big comeback thnx to American money. Gtfo here with social democracy is what caused prosperity. Correlation isn't causation. Social democracy arises after prosperity. If all of you were dead broke, none would talk about giving your hard-earned money to someone else. If social democracy were the secret to development and prosperity, Latin America wouldn't have a single third-world nation.
I don't need validation from a bunch of strangers in a forum, more than half the forum wouldn't agree with me and my way of thinking in the first place. It's easy for you to dismiss people who actually feel outrage against those who abuse power because you are incapable of feeling empathy for others in the first place.
But if I am being totally honest, you do care what I think. Because you can't help but get immensely triggered every time I call you out. You are the one who seeks validation, but you're unwilling to do any sort of real introspection. You've somehow deluded yourself into thinking you're part of the owner class, and you use you're half assed faith as a way to connect with other chuds on a cultural level. That's why I find you massively contemptible. You believe in power and excuse your selfishness by accusing others of being as sociopathic as you are. I don't pretend to be a bastion of morality, I simply say what I think as I always have, regardless of the opinions of chuds or the tankies to my left.
But if I am being totally honest, you do care what I think. Because you can't help but get immensely triggered every time I call you out. You are the one who seeks validation, but you're unwilling to do any sort of real introspection. You've somehow deluded yourself into thinking you're part of the owner class, and you use you're half assed faith as a way to connect with other chuds on a cultural level. That's why I find you massively contemptible. You believe in power and excuse your selfishness by accusing others of being as sociopathic as you are. I don't pretend to be a bastion of morality, I simply say what I think as I always have, regardless of the opinions of chuds or the tankies to my left.