The problem is that it's exactly that. As in productivist and meritocratic. It's not just about the marxist notion of the accumulation of capitals or the private ownership of the means of production.
That's one of the very major things that the USSR didn't aknowledge (at least not in my knowledge). This two mindset are the main ideological tools of capitalism as such they constitute what capitalism is also in nature and have major systematic applications.
To create a better word with common ownership of the means of production will not completely delete the meritocratic especially, in fact it might be the one thing that will transform the entire society into the communist or anarchist one.
We can't just separate capitalism from productivism or meritocracy. Just like we absolutely must not separate anti-capitalism from anti-meritocratic struggle.
Your point?
That's one of the very major things that the USSR didn't aknowledge (at least not in my knowledge). This two mindset are the main ideological tools of capitalism as such they constitute what capitalism is also in nature and have major systematic applications.
To create a better word with common ownership of the means of production will not completely delete the meritocratic especially, in fact it might be the one thing that will transform the entire society into the communist or anarchist one.
We can't just separate capitalism from productivism or meritocracy. Just like we absolutely must not separate anti-capitalism from anti-meritocratic struggle.
Your point?
Poverty is an inevitable byproduct of capitalism, and more poverty means more crime since material conditions is the #1 reason people commit crimes in the first place. If you commit a crime, then it is treated asa moral failure in the individual, and that he is lazy without merit for not pulling himself up by his bootstraps.