They do nothing but project; it’s NEVER a single trans person, it’s ALWAYS a straight white male EVERY God damn time…they are not in danger, they ARE the fucking danger
bUt tRuMp dIdN'T StArT AnY WaRs, HuRr dUrR! jUsT IgNoRe wHaT He's dOiNg tO HiS OwN CoUnTrY ThAt hE LoVeS So mUcH AnD WhAt hE WaNtS To dO To gAzA ToO!
With all these shootings and the Jan 6 insurrection and such, the brownshirts are doing their job for real.
Trump hasn't even finished his 1st year of his 2nd term. I can't even imagine what America will be like the next year, never mind the following 2 and god knows what will happen after that. And the UK is trying to imitate the USA even harder and Americanise their politics and the rest of country too, when "British Nationalists" are ironically glazing America too.
Even my own clownfoolery and insanity doesn't even pale in comparison to this, it's way beyond that in difference. It's like comparing a single planet to the scale of the entire universe at least. As much as I hate myself, I know I will never be remotely as scummy as Trump and his narcissistic, inhumane cult of murderers and actual terrorrists.
He's exactly the kind of monster that creative media has been satirising as megalomaniacal villains for decades now and trying to warn us all about, but dictators have existed and still exist en masse in the world ofc, but now it's in the worst place possible in the world too.
There's a reason they love Breaking Bad so much and want to pretend Season 5 isn't their favourite or they purposely miss out an important part of why they love Season 5 so much, cough.
Hey @RyoQ@Afroking in a couple of days I would like to talk with you about capitalism and why I think it's bad, if you want to
Imo the path you are on leads somewhere very dark and wrong, and maybe discussing why capitalism is bad will make you more interested in why so many right wing ideas are wrong
"Many Trans and gays voted for racist reason for a far right fascist, this doesn't mean they are rightwing, but that Trump is not really rightist"
If you think Trump is a centrist, you have the political awereness of a peanut forgotten by a squirrel running for his life in an pro-hunt american ad.
I wouldn't say million, more like maybe thousands at best (i don't have the numbers), but some people are just racist and completely brainwashed by the system.
The fact that oppressed people chose to align with the system is not a proof that said system is good.
When you go to work because you don't have a choice or because you think it's good for you, you are still following a system that is exploiting you. You are simply not aware of that.
Advocacy for transgenderism is of two thoughts, one is that one can change their gender/sex, the other is that their sex does not match their gender and so it does not need to "change"
Either position is one the killer would have to hold in dating this transgender, or he believes neither and is just dating a man.
Either way, there is no spinning that relationship as anything right wing try as you might
It is proof Trump is moderate on the issue of LGBT. Which he is and always has been. He condemns transgenderism but homosexuality, lesbians he does not condemn at all and probably supports
More so I think you should explain the flaws of conservatism.
"Conservatism is the theoretical voice against the power of the subordinate classes. Historically, the conservative has favored liberty for the higher order and constrant for the lower orders. What the conservative sees and dislikes in equality is not a threat to freedom, but in its extension. For in that extension, he sees a loss of his own freedom."
This quote explains the fundamental flaw of the ideology as a whole.
He is. He doesn't even oppose gay marriage which is the bare bones minimum of being anti LGBT.
Post automatically merged:
I will reiterate that I am on the far-right and oppose homosexuality/gay marriage being legal. An opportunist like Trump who compromises on this issue to get votes from LGBT and seemingly doesn't care ending gay marriage/pushing it to the state-level does not represent me at all.
After the 2015 Supreme Court ruling (Obergefell v. Hodges), Trump said he considered same-sex marriage “settled law.”
In a 2016 60 Minutes interview, he said:
“It’s law. It was settled in the Supreme Court. I mean it’s done.”
In 2022, when asked about the Respect for Marriage Act (which codified same-sex marriage protections in federal law), Trump did not vocally oppose it, where if he was against gay-marriage he would have derided the bill and encourage Republicans to vote against it.
We know given his behavior this year towards transgenderism that he is fully capable of going out on a limb in a condemnatory manner against social policy he is against. He is willing to push matters such as even abortion into being up to the states (and he is pro-choice himself).
But he has never touched gay marriage. Is silent about it and publicly has several statements showing he is OK with it such as during an episode of The Apprentice, speaking to Clay
CLAY: “I mean, she’s a beautiful woman … but they’re not my thing.”
TRUMP: “Okay, all right. That’s why they have menus in restaurants, you know."
essentially saying, "You like what you like", when if he was really against it he would have said something condemnatory towards Clay
He is. He doesn't even oppose gay marriage which is the bare bones minimum of being anti LGBT.
Post automatically merged:
I will reiterate that I am on the far-right and oppose homosexuality/gay marriage being legal. An opportunist like Trump who compromises on this issue to get votes from LGBT and seemingly doesn't care ending gay marriage/pushing it to the state-level does not represent me at all.
After the 2015 Supreme Court ruling (Obergefell v. Hodges), Trump said he considered same-sex marriage “settled law.”
In a 2016 60 Minutes interview, he said:
“It’s law. It was settled in the Supreme Court. I mean it’s done.”
In 2022, when asked about the Respect for Marriage Act (which codified same-sex marriage protections in federal law), Trump did not vocally oppose it, where if he was against gay-marriage he would have derided the bill and encourage Republicans to vote against it.
We know given his behavior this year towards transgenderism that he is fully capable of going out on a limb in a condemnatory manner against social policy he is against. He is willing to push matters such as even abortion into being up to the states (and he is pro-choice himself).
But he has never touched gay marriage. Is silent about it and publicly has several statements showing he is OK with it such as during an episode of The Apprentice, speaking to Clay
CLAY: “I mean, she’s a beautiful woman … but they’re not my thing.”
TRUMP: “Okay, all right. That’s why they have menus in restaurants, you know."
essentially saying, "You like what you like", when if he was really against it he would have said something condemnatory towards Clay
He is. He doesn't even oppose gay marriage which is the bare bones minimum of being anti LGBT.
Post automatically merged:
I will reiterate that I am on the far-right and oppose homosexuality/gay marriage being legal. An opportunist like Trump who compromises on this issue to get votes from LGBT and seemingly doesn't care ending gay marriage/pushing it to the state-level does not represent me at all.
After the 2015 Supreme Court ruling (Obergefell v. Hodges), Trump said he considered same-sex marriage “settled law.”
In a 2016 60 Minutes interview, he said:
“It’s law. It was settled in the Supreme Court. I mean it’s done.”
In 2022, when asked about the Respect for Marriage Act (which codified same-sex marriage protections in federal law), Trump did not vocally oppose it, where if he was against gay-marriage he would have derided the bill and encourage Republicans to vote against it.
We know given his behavior this year towards transgenderism that he is fully capable of going out on a limb in a condemnatory manner against social policy he is against. He is willing to push matters such as even abortion into being up to the states (and he is pro-choice himself).
But he has never touched gay marriage. Is silent about it and publicly has several statements showing he is OK with it such as during an episode of The Apprentice, speaking to Clay
CLAY: “I mean, she’s a beautiful woman … but they’re not my thing.”
TRUMP: “Okay, all right. That’s why they have menus in restaurants, you know."
essentially saying, "You like what you like", when if he was really against it he would have said something condemnatory towards Clay
Advocacy for transgenderism is of two thoughts, one is that one can change their gender/sex, the other is that their sex does not match their gender and so it does not need to "change"
Either position is one the killer would have to hold in dating this transgender, or he believes neither and is just dating a man.
Either way, there is no spinning that relationship as anything right wing try as you might
You are really underestimating the mental gymnastic that right winger do to satisfy their fetish. The reality is that it can be all the cases. In reality, there is no logic in place here. Someone in denial will create a form of completely weid behavior in regard to sex and gender, sometimes completely incoherent and in complete contradiction with itself.
And when such thing is made public, everythings crumble and the person can become extremily violent toward their partner.
It is proof Trump is moderate on the issue of LGBT. Which he is and always has been. He condemns transgenderism but homosexuality, lesbians he does not condemn at all and probably supports
Lmao. I think you do not understand something mate. There is no "being moderate" about LGBTQI+.
It's either you accept their existence and their right to exist, or you are on the side of their oppressor. There is no "I'm for gay but F Trans people" . If you against the second you are ALSO against the first, no matter what you say, systematically, you will harm them the same way.
Trump is no moderate he is a fucking fascist bigot who can't understand the simplest concepts of gender identity. It's not hard to understand, children can. But not Trump and not his defenders.
Trump is an absolute danger for the LGBTQI+ community. Period. Waving a flag is not enough lmao this is called pinkwashing.
I won't debate more on this subject with you as you seem completely uneducated on the subject. I'm willing to put my axe down, but you gonna need to stop defending that fascist.
I won't debate more on this subject with you as you seem completely uneducated on the subject. I'm willing to put my axe down, but you gonna need to stop defending that fascist.
Yes, there is possible being "moderate" on an issue like LGBT+, if you are against transgenderism but OKAY or even vote for gay marriage are you really an enemy to LGBT+?
even many gays oppose transgenderism in 2025 and are hostile to it
Again, it is a natural law evil first that is reaffirmed by religion. It is not something religion creates a rule condemning, but reaffirms that it is evil
So gay marriage could be outlawed entirely distinct from Christian observance. Even if I was not Christian I would still oppose it like I oppose other natural evils such as murder, incest, theft, things like that
You are really underestimating the mental gymnastic that right winger do to satisfy their fetish. The reality is that it can be all the cases. In reality, there is no logic in place here. Someone in denial will create a form of completely weid behavior in regard to sex and gender, sometimes completely incoherent and in complete contradiction with itself.
You're uneducated. Yes, there is possible being "moderate" on an issue like LGBT+, if you are against transgenderism but OKAY or even vote for gay marriage are you really an enemy to LGBT+?
It's 1 or 0. Either you are aknowledging and accepting their existence or you don't and oppose them. It's not that difficult. It's the fact of being a piece of shit against the fact of being just a normal human with empathy.
I think you do not understand that heteronormativity and cisnormativity are ALL a result of the domination system that is patriarchy. As such, these oppression are fondamentally linked and when Trans stop being the target:
LGB people are the next in line.
As such being against a group is being against the ENTIRE group.
And yes, this includes people who are gay and fighting against trans people. They are fighting themselves. Not easy to understand when you are a rightist, but perfectly logical when you are a leftist.
It's 1 or 0. Either you are aknowledging and accepting their existence or you don't and oppose them. It's not that difficult. It's the fact of being a piece of shit against the fact of being just a normal human with empathy.
Yes, there is possible being "moderate" on an issue like LGBT+, if you are against transgenderism but OKAY or even vote for gay marriage are you really an enemy to LGBT+?
even many gays oppose transgenderism in 2025 and are hostile to it
Post automatically merged:
Again, it is a natural law evil first that is reaffirmed by religion. It is not something religion creates a rule condemning, but reaffirms that it is evil
So gay marriage could be outlawed entirely distinct from Christian observance. Even if I was not Christian I would still oppose it like I oppose other natural evils such as murder, incest, theft, things like that
Post automatically merged:
"someone in denial will create a new behavior based on"
isn't our behavior based on what we believe? Why a so called right-winger is engaging in homosexual/pro transgender actions if he is opposed to it?
Do you have an argument on how homosexuality is detrimental in comparison to things like murder, incest, theft, and so on, outside of "Muh bible told me so!"?
Do you have an argument on how homosexuality is detrimental in comparison to things like murder, incest, theft, and so on, outside of "Muh bible told me so!"?
None of my arguments against homosexuality would be biblical or even mention God at all. They also would not be based on "detriment", that is utilitarian and morals do not derive from what is merely useful, or practical vs detrimental.
None of my arguments against homosexuality would be biblical or even mention God at all. They also would not be based on "detriment", that is utilitarian and morals do not derive from what is merely useful, or practical vs detrimental.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
