Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
but the cis people who are not uncomfortable with sharing that space with the other sex can also use the unisex toilet. unisex doesnt mean its only for transgender individuals?!
your analogy would work better if it is a female only party and i ask females if its ok if i invite males.
what im saying is your analogy is horse shit.
Post automatically merged:
your analogy would work better if it is a female only party and i ask females if its ok if i invite males.
what im saying is your analogy is horse shit.
No, the analogy is exactly correct. We are talking about prejudice based on appearance. Asking women if they are fine about other women coming in their bathrooms because of the appearance of other women is the same as asking if white people are ok if racialized people come to a party where everybody feel safe.
you are talking about prejudice. im talking about a very huge portion of the population that feels uncomfortable with the opposite sex in their sex separated spaces. are some of these individuals uncomfortable with that idea because of prejudice? sure maybe. but that doesnt mean its all of them.
at the core of this is the difference in biological sex, so they probably have an issue with males looking like females due to whatever changes to their appearance (be it makeup, surgery, clothing or whatever) using these spaces as well.
i dont think the relevant studies go this deep into the details though.
and this is exactly the issue of gender-based definitions for these terms and why i used female/male explicitly.
at the core of this is the difference in biological sex, so they probably have an issue with males looking like females due to whatever changes to their appearance (be it makeup, surgery, clothing or whatever) using these spaces as well.
i dont think the relevant studies go this deep into the details though.
Post automatically merged:
and this is exactly the issue of gender-based definitions for these terms and why i used female/male explicitly.
And? White supremacist are also uncomfortable with brown people being in everyday spaces, do you see me ask for their advice on the matter? The feeling of insecurity is not always legitimate boy.
There is no reason not to accept trans people other than prejucide and transphobia.
Hep Einstein, how do you call intersex people? Male or female?
Actually you have no ideas how deep real studies go to explain just how transphobic this behavior is right now.
There is no reason not to accept trans people other than prejucide and transphobia.
Hep Einstein, how do you call intersex people? Male or female?
Actually you have no ideas how deep real studies go to explain just how transphobic this behavior is right now.
depends, since some intersex people actually fit either biological definition and some dont. the ones who dont we call intersex. the ones who do we still call intersex due to their condition, but technically they are male/female (and we could just call them that tbh), and some conditions dont even stop them from reproducing.
im specifically talking about studies on the rate of females not accepting males in their sex separated spaces, regardless of gender identity. feel free to hit me up with those deep details we just talked about.
if that is your response to a biologically correct statement, alright.
im not though, and legit a couple posts above this i said i personally dont have any issue with transgender individuals in my spaces
Post automatically merged:
if that is your response to a biologically correct statement, alright.
Post automatically merged:
And this is the reason why you are dehumanizing trans people
You're Turkish aka at the source
Why do you feel the need to use the word 'dehumanizing' in such an.inflationary manner?
As I see it, one big problem is the reinforcement of the binary norm.
If you take a look at other cultures who traditionally know of more than 2 genders, they usually have a 3rd gender altogether or even more. The current trans debate expects individuals to conform to pre existing male and female boxes.
Understanding that a trans woman is not the same as a cis woman is not dehumanizing. It's accepting reality.
Society needs to evolve to a point where everyone is accepted for who they are. As long as the binary standard is prevalent, trans people will have a harder time struggling to accept their physical reality.
A society that accepts a trans person's identity foe what it is, might even lead to less affirmative surgeries since as of right now, the reconciliation of one sex's body and the other gender's mind don't seem to work foe many people, leading to gender dysphoria and eventual medical procedures that are often taxing on body and mind and may lead to health complications.
Unfortunately to everyone's detriment, the ones feigning trans allyship are corporations that make a lot of money through surgery and hormones.
The medical industry managed to create an entirely new pationt group out of thin air by selling them the dream of changing their place in the binary, dualistic society we currently live with.
We must leave behind this narrow world view and embrace humans for who they are goddamnit.
Unisex means for everyone. Like unisex clothing for example.
Why do you feel the need to use the word 'dehumanizing' in such an.inflationary manner?
As I see it, one big problem is the reinforcement of the binary norm.
If you take a look at other cultures who traditionally know of more than 2 genders, they usually have a 3rd gender altogether or even more. The current trans debate expects individuals to conform to pre existing male and female boxes.
Understanding that a trans woman is not the same as a cis woman is not dehumanizing. It's accepting reality.
Society needs to evolve to a point where everyone is accepted for who they are. As long as the binary standard is prevalent, trans people will have a harder time struggling to accept their physical reality.
A society that accepts a trans person's identity foe what it is, might even lead to less affirmative surgeries since as of right now, the reconciliation of one sex's body and the other gender's mind don't seem to work foe many people, leading to gender dysphoria and eventual medical procedures that are often taxing on body and mind and may lead to health complications.
Unfortunately to everyone's detriment, the ones feigning trans allyship are corporations that make a lot of money through surgery and hormones.
The medical industry managed to create an entirely new pationt group out of thin air by selling them the dream of changing their place in the binary, dualistic society we currently live with.
We must leave behind this narrow world view and embrace humans for who they are goddamnit.
Unisex means for everyone. Like unisex clothing for example.