Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
im specifically talking about studies on the rate of females not accepting males in their sex separated spaces, regardless of gender identity. feel free to hit me up with those deep details we just talked about.
[automerge]1760645128[/automerge]
if that is your response to a biologically correct statement, alright.
[automerge]1760645230[/automerge]
im not though, and legit a couple posts above this i said i personally dont have any issue with transgender individuals in my spaces
[automerge]1760645128[/automerge]
if that is your response to a biologically correct statement, alright.
[automerge]1760645230[/automerge]
And this is the reason why you are dehumanizing trans people
You're Turkish aka at the source
Why do you feel the need to use the word 'dehumanizing' in such an.inflationary manner?
As I see it, one big problem is the reinforcement of the binary norm.
If you take a look at other cultures who traditionally know of more than 2 genders, they usually have a 3rd gender altogether or even more. The current trans debate expects individuals to conform to pre existing male and female boxes.
Understanding that a trans woman is not the same as a cis woman is not dehumanizing. It's accepting reality.
Society needs to evolve to a point where everyone is accepted for who they are. As long as the binary standard is prevalent, trans people will have a harder time struggling to accept their physical reality.
A society that accepts a trans person's identity foe what it is, might even lead to less affirmative surgeries since as of right now, the reconciliation of one sex's body and the other gender's mind don't seem to work foe many people, leading to gender dysphoria and eventual medical procedures that are often taxing on body and mind and may lead to health complications.
Unfortunately to everyone's detriment, the ones feigning trans allyship are corporations that make a lot of money through surgery and hormones.
The medical industry managed to create an entirely new pationt group out of thin air by selling them the dream of changing their place in the binary, dualistic society we currently live with.
We must leave behind this narrow world view and embrace humans for who they are goddamnit.
Unisex means for everyone. Like unisex clothing for example.
Why do you feel the need to use the word 'dehumanizing' in such an.inflationary manner?
As I see it, one big problem is the reinforcement of the binary norm.
If you take a look at other cultures who traditionally know of more than 2 genders, they usually have a 3rd gender altogether or even more. The current trans debate expects individuals to conform to pre existing male and female boxes.
Understanding that a trans woman is not the same as a cis woman is not dehumanizing. It's accepting reality.
Society needs to evolve to a point where everyone is accepted for who they are. As long as the binary standard is prevalent, trans people will have a harder time struggling to accept their physical reality.
A society that accepts a trans person's identity foe what it is, might even lead to less affirmative surgeries since as of right now, the reconciliation of one sex's body and the other gender's mind don't seem to work foe many people, leading to gender dysphoria and eventual medical procedures that are often taxing on body and mind and may lead to health complications.
Unfortunately to everyone's detriment, the ones feigning trans allyship are corporations that make a lot of money through surgery and hormones.
The medical industry managed to create an entirely new pationt group out of thin air by selling them the dream of changing their place in the binary, dualistic society we currently live with.
We must leave behind this narrow world view and embrace humans for who they are goddamnit.
Unisex means for everyone. Like unisex clothing for example.
Sure
I modified one word in your post. I hope you will understand the problem.
Because that what it feels like. Dehumanization is a spectrum.
Being white is not the same as being brown. You don't see white people restricting brown people from their space tho...
Wait...
I agree. Probably yes. This is a very possible future. But it's a future in which patriarchy and cisnormativity do not exist anymore, which is as far as the sun. For the moment, trans are suffering, so the best thing to do is to include them instead of rejecting them.
ok
I modified one word in your post. I hope you will understand the problem.
Because that what it feels like. Dehumanization is a spectrum.
Being white is not the same as being brown. You don't see white people restricting brown people from their space tho...
Wait...
I agree. Probably yes. This is a very possible future. But it's a future in which patriarchy and cisnormativity do not exist anymore, which is as far as the sun. For the moment, trans are suffering, so the best thing to do is to include them instead of rejecting them.
ok
I modified one word in your post. I hope you will understand the problem.
[automerge]1760646851[/automerge]
[automerge]1760646961[/automerge]
ok
not necessarily at the expense of other people who are also vulnerable though. . . .
[automerge]1760647295[/automerge]
but he only speaks for marginalized people if convenient to the point/agenda, as evident by him saying "talk to women" (marginalized btw) only for him to completely deflect from this immediately by calling ~half the female population transphobes who are dehumanizing transgender individuals.
[automerge]1760647295[/automerge]
but he only speaks for marginalized people if convenient to the point/agenda, as evident by him saying "talk to women" (marginalized btw) only for him to completely deflect from this immediately by calling ~half the female population transphobes who are dehumanizing transgender individuals.
No. We can't live in capitalism like we would in communism. We have to do things the hard way. Men will not stop being a danger to women just because of unisex bathrooms. Especially transwomen that are massively in danger around men.
No, i just passed the troll mode threadshold, meaning that you tired me out to the point of nullyfying my need/toc to reply for tonight. For tonight, I'll no longer waste my time in carring about the ignorant things you will be saying.
I'm not, I'm only sharing what THEY are saying. My words are only their words, sometime copying even sentences for sentences.
At what expense? The risk of seeing a trans women peeing while standing?
No, i just passed the troll mode threadshold, meaning that you tired me out to the point of nullyfying my need/toc to reply for tonight. For tonight, I'll no longer waste my time in carring about the ignorant things you will be saying.
I'm not, I'm only sharing what THEY are saying. My words are only their words, sometime copying even sentences for sentences.
At what expense? The risk of seeing a trans women peeing while standing?
if you want to downplay the concerns of females in this way be my guest.My dude
Human races don't exist , skin color and appearance are a spectrum.
Biological sex, on the other hand, is reality. We can't act like it doesn't exist or that it doesn't influence how societies are built.
What we do have influence over is how we allow it to shape the way we interact with one another. We are homo sapiens, as of right now we're still reproducing sexually, you can't rip someone's finger off and plant it in the soil expecting a new person to grow.
Goalpost moving 101
Human races don't exist , skin color and appearance are a spectrum.
Biological sex, on the other hand, is reality. We can't act like it doesn't exist or that it doesn't influence how societies are built.
What we do have influence over is how we allow it to shape the way we interact with one another. We are homo sapiens, as of right now we're still reproducing sexually, you can't rip someone's finger off and plant it in the soil expecting a new person to grow.
Goalpost moving 101
