Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Yes it does. omfg. An apartheid doesn't imply that all people must be citizen of the country. Futhermore, this apartheid also concerns citizen (/minorities).
This is an apartheid. Acted by juridic and humanitary instances.
This existed (still exist?) also with Palestinian women and women of minorities in Israel btw
This is an apartheid. Acted by juridic and humanitary instances.
This existed (still exist?) also with Palestinian women and women of minorities in Israel btw
https://www.irishstar.com/culture/entertainment/megyn-kelly-jeffrey-epstein-criticism-36257691
Only in the Golden Age of Grifting can this dumb gash still have a career after defending the most notorious pedophile of all time…this would be completely disqualifying in a healthy and sane world; instead, she gets to pull the old HIB and act like 15 year olds are fully developed, totally viable sexual partners, almost certainly without consequence
Only in the Golden Age of Grifting can this dumb gash still have a career after defending the most notorious pedophile of all time…this would be completely disqualifying in a healthy and sane world; instead, she gets to pull the old HIB and act like 15 year olds are fully developed, totally viable sexual partners, almost certainly without consequence
https://www.irishstar.com/culture/entertainment/megyn-kelly-jeffrey-epstein-criticism-36257691
Only in the Golden Age of Grifting can this dumb gash still have a career after defending the most notorious pedophile of all time…this would be completely disqualifying in a healthy and sane world; instead, she gets to pull the old HIB and act like 15 year olds are fully developed, totally viable sexual partners, almost certainly without consequence
Only in the Golden Age of Grifting can this dumb gash still have a career after defending the most notorious pedophile of all time…this would be completely disqualifying in a healthy and sane world; instead, she gets to pull the old HIB and act like 15 year olds are fully developed, totally viable sexual partners, almost certainly without consequence
To segway to something else in a similar vein, Trump has ordered he FBI to investigate the Democratics and Bill Clinton for involvement with Epstein. Why? Because any files under FBI investigation can't be released. If the files are so unimportant or a hoax, why be so vehemently against them being released? 🤔
@Logiko Don't bother quoting my posts. I don't respect you enough to read or debate your schizoid delusions.
Yes, Palestine, the region, did exist, and it was originally called Judea. Yes, the Palestinians were offered sovereignty multiple times actually:
1937- Peel Commission partition plan (British mandate).
1947-UN partition plan (resolution 181).
1978~79-Camp David frameworks (Egypt-Israel peace talks).
1993~1995-Oslo Accords.
2000-David Camp Summit (Clinton/Barack/Arafat).
2001- Taba negotiations.
2002-The Arab Peace Initiative.
2008-Olmert proposal to Abbas.
2014-Kerry peace plan framework talks.
2020-Trump "peace to prosperity" plan.
All of these are easily accessible to anyone on Google. A two-state solution has been tried many times, and the Arabs always rejected any talks or negotiation.
Is it me, or did you just deny that multiple terrorist organizations—like Hamas and Hezbollah—want Israel gone simply because it is a Jewish state? I won't even go deep into how other Arabic nations *cough* Iran and Qatar *cough* finance terrorism for this very goal. Back when Palestinians were under the rule of other Muslims and Arabs, there was no revolt for Palestinian identity and sovereignty. Some of the land owned by current Israel was bought by Jews; most of it was public land given by the Ottoman Empire. 160 of 193 UN member nations recognize Israel as a sovereign nation. Palestinians have no claim to Israeli lands.
Where did I say anything about LEGAL migration? Apples to oranges, ignorant. Brazilians and Portuguese are brother nations. We have been migrating into each other's countries for centuries now. We have diplomatic arrangements concerning that too. My grandparents were Portuguese. My mom, sister, and I are Portuguese citizens. There is no migrant crisis between Portugal and Brazil. What is going on in Europe is CRIMINAL! I don't really expect a morally grounded stance from the likes of you; don't bother replying.
Not gonna lie, this sounds fishy as fuck. Why can't the orange man just release the files already? He could release the files and then order an investigation by the FBI at the same time. All the crimes coming to light would generate massive support for him. All of this makes him look bad.
Yes, Palestine, the region, did exist, and it was originally called Judea. Yes, the Palestinians were offered sovereignty multiple times actually:
1937- Peel Commission partition plan (British mandate).
1947-UN partition plan (resolution 181).
1978~79-Camp David frameworks (Egypt-Israel peace talks).
1993~1995-Oslo Accords.
2000-David Camp Summit (Clinton/Barack/Arafat).
2001- Taba negotiations.
2002-The Arab Peace Initiative.
2008-Olmert proposal to Abbas.
2014-Kerry peace plan framework talks.
2020-Trump "peace to prosperity" plan.
All of these are easily accessible to anyone on Google. A two-state solution has been tried many times, and the Arabs always rejected any talks or negotiation.
Is it me, or did you just deny that multiple terrorist organizations—like Hamas and Hezbollah—want Israel gone simply because it is a Jewish state? I won't even go deep into how other Arabic nations *cough* Iran and Qatar *cough* finance terrorism for this very goal. Back when Palestinians were under the rule of other Muslims and Arabs, there was no revolt for Palestinian identity and sovereignty. Some of the land owned by current Israel was bought by Jews; most of it was public land given by the Ottoman Empire. 160 of 193 UN member nations recognize Israel as a sovereign nation. Palestinians have no claim to Israeli lands.
Where did I say anything about LEGAL migration? Apples to oranges, ignorant. Brazilians and Portuguese are brother nations. We have been migrating into each other's countries for centuries now. We have diplomatic arrangements concerning that too. My grandparents were Portuguese. My mom, sister, and I are Portuguese citizens. There is no migrant crisis between Portugal and Brazil. What is going on in Europe is CRIMINAL! I don't really expect a morally grounded stance from the likes of you; don't bother replying.
Not gonna lie, this sounds fishy as fuck. Why can't the orange man just release the files already? He could release the files and then order an investigation by the FBI at the same time. All the crimes coming to light would generate massive support for him. All of this makes him look bad.
Last edited:
That’s been the unanswered question for half a decade now; if anything exonerates him in any way, he would have made it public at 12 AM on January 21st, so where’s all this evidence of his innocence?? He’s circling the fucking drain, dude…I know Teflon Don is still undefeated when it comes to skirting the law, but this might finally break the streak 
You said Palestinians want to destroy Israel and then proceed to name two terrorist organizations (only one of which is based in Palestine) that actively fight against Israel.
Talk about painting with broad strokes.
The peace talks point isn't even worth discussing when in most of them Palestine either a) wasn't directly represented by any representative, and b) deal were lopsided
Talk about painting with broad strokes.
The peace talks point isn't even worth discussing when in most of them Palestine either a) wasn't directly represented by any representative, and b) deal were lopsided
https://www.commondreams.org/news/a...ution-most-refuse-to-embrace-medicare-for-all
Seriously, what even is the argument against M4A? Rise in premiums? No, because private insurers already do that at least once a year; restricted access to care? Every provider in the US accepts Medicare, so that’s not it either; increased risk of claim fraud? I’ve been a healthcare biller for a decade now, and I can assure y’all that kind of thing will happen no matter what, so it shouldn’t be a bigger concern than it already is. The only thing detractors can say is that it’s a socialist practice, and we’ve all waxed philosophical on that concept as is…ergo, since there’s no real reason not to open it up to everyone, then it’s gotta be the usual - the unfettered, shameless greed of people who already have more money than God
Seriously, what even is the argument against M4A? Rise in premiums? No, because private insurers already do that at least once a year; restricted access to care? Every provider in the US accepts Medicare, so that’s not it either; increased risk of claim fraud? I’ve been a healthcare biller for a decade now, and I can assure y’all that kind of thing will happen no matter what, so it shouldn’t be a bigger concern than it already is. The only thing detractors can say is that it’s a socialist practice, and we’ve all waxed philosophical on that concept as is…ergo, since there’s no real reason not to open it up to everyone, then it’s gotta be the usual - the unfettered, shameless greed of people who already have more money than God
My guy, Hamas was democratically elected. The Palestinians voted for a group that swore in its charter to destroy Israel way back in 1988. They were elected in 2006. You mean to tell me the Palestinians hold no ill will towards Israel? Please, we are not children here. Hamas only softened its stance in 2017.
Back in the Ottoman Empire days, there wasn't such revolt over identity and sovereignty either. All of this is in response to Zionism. I don't support everything Israel does, but there is enough historical evidence to support the claim that the nonexistence of a Palestinian state is to be blamed on the Arabs themselves:
1937- Peel Commission
Zionist leaders accepted the proposition; Arabic leaders did not. In fact, they rejected the idea of partition entirely.
1947- UN Partition Plan (Resolution 181)
The Jewish agency accepted it; Arab states and Palestinian authorities rejected it.
2000- Camp David Summit
The offer included 100% of Gaza and 90% of the West Bank. Arafat did not accept.
2008-Ehud Olmert Proposal
~94% of the West Bank, 1:1 land swaps, shared Jerusalem, and an international plan for refugees. Abbas refused.
Granted some other negotiations were fucked up by Israelis—the 2001 Taba summit, for example—but it is very clear the Arabs have always been nitpicking about these terms.
Edit: Actually, I said that "Arabs" want Israel gone. Of course, it's a generalization. Many Arab nations have strong ties with Israel and could be considered "allied" nations. You get my point.
Back in the Ottoman Empire days, there wasn't such revolt over identity and sovereignty either. All of this is in response to Zionism. I don't support everything Israel does, but there is enough historical evidence to support the claim that the nonexistence of a Palestinian state is to be blamed on the Arabs themselves:
1937- Peel Commission
Zionist leaders accepted the proposition; Arabic leaders did not. In fact, they rejected the idea of partition entirely.
1947- UN Partition Plan (Resolution 181)
The Jewish agency accepted it; Arab states and Palestinian authorities rejected it.
2000- Camp David Summit
The offer included 100% of Gaza and 90% of the West Bank. Arafat did not accept.
2008-Ehud Olmert Proposal
~94% of the West Bank, 1:1 land swaps, shared Jerusalem, and an international plan for refugees. Abbas refused.
Granted some other negotiations were fucked up by Israelis—the 2001 Taba summit, for example—but it is very clear the Arabs have always been nitpicking about these terms.
Edit: Actually, I said that "Arabs" want Israel gone. Of course, it's a generalization. Many Arab nations have strong ties with Israel and could be considered "allied" nations. You get my point.
Last edited:
Ignorant + coward + Fascist ideology + Colonist apologist (+ sanist)
Citizenship is not mentioned in the definitions, it concerns all people resident in the country and racialized groups. It's simply the case of strong a racial form of domination. Racism in the open, if you prefer. Technically, many western countries are paving the way to apartheid at the moment. I'm scared for the US especially.
Citizenship is not mentioned in the definitions, it concerns all people resident in the country and racialized groups. It's simply the case of strong a racial form of domination. Racism in the open, if you prefer. Technically, many western countries are paving the way to apartheid at the moment. I'm scared for the US especially.
Ottoman Empire in Palestine was chill compared to the Zionist deportations and genocide. As a matter of fact, Ottoman Empire as a whole was tolerant (with limits depending on which exact era) compared to its European neighbour with his « minorities » and its colonization.
Obviously not an utopia though
Obviously not an utopia though
Ignorant + coward + Fascist ideology + Colonist apologist (+ sanist)
Citizenship is not mentioned in the definitions, it concerns all people resident in the country and racialized groups. It's simply the case of strong a racial form of domination. Racism in the open, if you prefer. Technically, many western countries are paving the way to apartheid at the moment. I'm scared for the US especially.
Citizenship is not mentioned in the definitions, it concerns all people resident in the country and racialized groups. It's simply the case of strong a racial form of domination. Racism in the open, if you prefer. Technically, many western countries are paving the way to apartheid at the moment. I'm scared for the US especially.
No, Brazilians that migrate illegally deserve to be deported just like anyone else. The thing is, THERE IS NO ILLEGAL MASS MIGRATION OF BRAZILIANS GOING ON IN PORTUGAL. Btw, around ~5 million Brazilians are Portuguese citizens as well. We have received way more Portuguese in Brazil than the other way around.
There are over 25 ethnicities living in Brazil. Jews, Arabs, Asians, Africans, Europeans...you name them. We have historically received migrants from all over the world every time a conflict popped up. 99% of our population speaks Portuguese. They all assimilated into our culture, and we cherish the good things their cultures have shared with us. We don't have conflicts over ethnicity/religion.
You are trying to label me as a racist anti-immigration zealot with nothing to back your arguments. I wouldn't be saying a thing about Europe if there were no spike in criminality, disrespect of the European way of living, and political/cultural subversion perpetrated by said migrants. There would be no reason to complain about anything if life there was going on as usual; the problem is that European peace has been disturbed, and their national identities are also at risk.
But go on about how I'm such a racist for condemning ILLEGAL AND UNCONTROLLED IMMIGRATION. It's very easy to point fingers and virtue signal about shit you don't live from the safety of your mom's basement.
There are over 25 ethnicities living in Brazil. Jews, Arabs, Asians, Africans, Europeans...you name them. We have historically received migrants from all over the world every time a conflict popped up. 99% of our population speaks Portuguese. They all assimilated into our culture, and we cherish the good things their cultures have shared with us. We don't have conflicts over ethnicity/religion.
You are trying to label me as a racist anti-immigration zealot with nothing to back your arguments. I wouldn't be saying a thing about Europe if there were no spike in criminality, disrespect of the European way of living, and political/cultural subversion perpetrated by said migrants. There would be no reason to complain about anything if life there was going on as usual; the problem is that European peace has been disturbed, and their national identities are also at risk.
But go on about how I'm such a racist for condemning ILLEGAL AND UNCONTROLLED IMMIGRATION. It's very easy to point fingers and virtue signal about shit you don't live from the safety of your mom's basement.
Last edited by a moderator:
I’d rather ask historians. And not even the Turkish ones.
But as I said, as a whole. Communities lived together. Wether Christian, Jewish or Muslim. With limits such as taxes higher taxes for non Muslims.
It also depends on the era. People often bring up the 19th century as if the Empire hadn’t lasted for centuries. Wether it’s Byzantium or classical Roman Empire, they never collapse in one year. There is a period of decline.
But as I said, as a whole. Communities lived together. Wether Christian, Jewish or Muslim. With limits such as taxes higher taxes for non Muslims.
It also depends on the era. People often bring up the 19th century as if the Empire hadn’t lasted for centuries. Wether it’s Byzantium or classical Roman Empire, they never collapse in one year. There is a period of decline.
"O Muslims! Know and be aware that the Qizilbāsh people, whose leader is Ismail son of Ardabil has looked down on our Prophet's laws (Sharia), his custom (sunna), the religion of Islam, the religious science and the Qur'an, which tells us what is right and wrong. They have regarded the prohibitions of God as being allowed. They have offended the Holy Qur'an and burned it by throwing it into the fire. They have even seen their own damned leader as God and prostrated to him. They have cursed and denied the caliphate of the noble Abu Bakr and Umar. They have slandered and cursed the Prophet's wife, our mother Aisha. They intend to eradicate the Prophet's laws (Sharia) and the religion of Islam. Their other offensive statements and behavior similar to what is mentioned here, is known clearly by both me and the rest of the Islamic scholars. We have therefore in accordance with the rules of the religious law (Sharia) and the rights provided in our books, issued a statement (fatwa) towards this population as being infidel and pagan. It is any Muslims duty to destroy such a population. The holy martyr Muslims who die in this connection will achieve the highest paradise (Jannat ul-Ala). The infidels who die, will become contemptible and end up in a place in the deepest hell. The condition of this population is worse than the unbelievers (Christians and Jews). The animals that these people butcher or hunt down are impure (murdar), whether it is by falconry, bow or dog. The marriages they make among each other or with other populations are not valid. They have no right to inheritance. If they live in a village, only the Sultan of Islam, has the right to take over their properties and values and their children by slaughtering all the villagers. These values can only be divided between soldiers of Islam. After this collection, one should not listen to their repentances and regrets, but kill all of them. If it is known that there are any one of them or anyone who supports them here in this town, these must be killed. This kind of population is both incredulous and pagan and at the same time harmful. For these two reasons, it is necessary (vajib) to kill them. God helps those who help the religion and harms those who do harm to a Muslim"
[automerge]1763459297[/automerge]
Straight from the Mufti's mouth all the way back to 1500s btw
[automerge]1763459297[/automerge]
Straight from the Mufti's mouth all the way back to 1500s btw