1. I knew for a fact that you were one the people he called sexist.

2. Typed your name and sexism in the search engine in the naka thread lol
To be honest, if I encountered the me from 4 years ago, I would probably call myself out for being too liberal, indealist and too individualistic. That's why I do understand why it must have pissed you off to see me calling out every one in the thread.

I was not necessarily wrong, I just had the wrong approach.
 
That's because you don't think systematically and thus, you do not understand what the police is, systematically. You can tell me "but I do".. the reality is that if you consider that it's a problem to generalize the police, you are not doing it. Because there are enough evidences now to believe that the police is systematically a problem. A problem that needs systemic solutions : Defund, disband.
But then you arent just generalizing cops, you are equivocating cops with the police force itself
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
Ye fuck diversity of opinions
all hail echo chamber
I recall him declaring or heavily insinuating only leftist can be real One Piece fans when he left the first time. Would really explain why he so heavily correlates toxicity and grievance with One Piece with right wing.

Left wing political safe haven = only positive talk of OP it seems
 
Logiko does have a point about the police, while it is a systemic issue not all police officers are like this.
Thats exactly what everyones opinion here seems to be, but logiko will still twist it to make you look like a boot licker now as well
Post automatically merged:

I'll humor you here. Let's say everything works out and the police are defunded and disbanded. What then?
What happens if tragedies like 9/11 happen again? What do we do without the police to help there?
What about a shooter holding a school hostage?
That shit wont happen in logikos ideal fantasy world
Post automatically merged:

You know what's fascinating? You have this ability to find really insightful articles but refuse to actually read them and horribly misquoted them. You're like those Wikipedia authors who provide sources but when I read the source link it says something completely different.
Are you doing this on purpose or do you really have no reading comprehension?
Confirmation bias + selective reading
Post automatically merged:

can't be reformed from the inside.
Not from the inside alone, but dont you think it helps if people from within and from outside try to reform the police?
 
Last edited:
"If you dont cry at the funeral, you obviously never cared about that person nor have sympathy". There it is.

Once judging how people should feel and act. Them not acting the way you want doesnt mean they dont understand. Always trying to remove individuality and the human condition.
And i have told him numerous times that people disagreeing with him doesnt mean they dont understand his arguments (as if what he is saying is profound)
 
Left wing political safe haven = only positive talk of OP it seems
Thats exactly what everyones opinion here seems to be, but logiko will still twist it to make you look like a boot licker now as well
"People think there is a systemic issue in the police" > Reality > People want to reform the police / "There are good people"

> In others words, they don't understand what "systemic" means.

Vaguely knowing that there is a systemic issue and knowing that the system of the police is the problem are two very different things.


Left wing political safe haven = only positive talk of OP it seems
Nah. Just more*



And i have told him numerous times that people disagreeing with him doesnt mean they dont understand his arguments (as if what he is saying is profound)
lmao you are still not understand the issue (see what I did there? :donk:)
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
And i have told him numerous times that people disagreeing with him doesnt mean they dont understand his arguments (as if what he is saying is profound)
I think this describes his issues perfectly(skip to the bolded for the TL;DR)
Dial back the narcissism and pay attention to what people say please. Its very ironic and hypocritical of you. Please try to follow without twisting anything:

You took the stance that Carrot would be SH, straight up telling anyone who said otherwise that they were wrong and needed to read the story. You claimed Carrot joining wasn't your opinion, but an analysis based on what the story is clearly presenting to us. To you, it was so obvious that Carrot was being built for a grand payoff that those who disagree must have an unreasonable level of bias. For anyone who disagreed or shit talked Carrot, you claimed it stems from toxicity rooted in their inner sexism and misogyny, typically perpetuated by the right wingers. It didn't matter if they loved other females or shit talked males, they were sexist or right wing if it came to Carrot.

You even told @Jew D. Boy (sorry if the tags annoy you Jew. Just making a point), a feminist and ideologically similar to you, to stop being so awfully sexist. You even told him "if you are progressive, I'm Queen Elizabeth", all because of Carrot.

Hell, you even said Tama was gonna join the SHs and told those who disagreed that they need to read the story(funnily enough, you said it to @Roo )

You were laughably wrong about Carrot(and Tama) joining, and initially blamed Oda for messing up. Replace Carrot with leftism or other topics, and the situation remains the same. You admitting you were wrong is irrelvant, since you use the exact same stances and tactics in other topics. Your issue is that you always try and mask your opinions as sole natural conclusions based on the facts. You love using facts to tell lies, push falsehoods, and parade subjective ideas, and pretend that anyone who disagrees must not understand the facts. For example, it is a fact that the police are tools for oppression. It is a fact that the police are tools to uphold the status quo. Those facts dont make your subjective opinion of the police being unnecessary today the only viable or factual option.



Lol conspiracy pilled like what? Genuinely curious. 9/11? Charlie Kirk? Trump economic plans? There's a few options lol
 
Like whats up with this anyway? Initially people everywhere were pointing out inconsistencies in the main story and then suddenly im not seeing any mentions of this around
Post automatically merged:

You are blind to a war of opinions in leftism :carrocorn:
No im not, but congrats for feeding all the points people are raising against you atm
Post automatically merged:

:suresure:
Post automatically merged:

lmao you are still not understand the issue (see what I did there? :donk:)
Yes, you are being the usual anti-logiko

Nothing new
 
Last edited:

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
Like whats up with this anyway? Initially people everywhere were pointing out inconsistencies in the main story and then suddenly im not seeing any mentions of this
Because of censorship. People who posted or spoke about it were getting deleted and banned in droves cause it was increasing anti-israel sentiment. Also time and the holidays.

They did the same type of censorship for Thomas Crooks(Trump would-be assassin) cause everything about him was hard conservative, and Luigi Mangoine(CEO Brian Thompson) cause the U.S. hated the Healthcare industry more than they thought.

Also the passage of time.
 
No im not, but congrats for feeding all the points people are raising against you atm
Me : wants to make this place leftist
You : "Ye fuck diversity of opinions"
Me : "You are blind to a war of opinions in leftism"
You : "No im not" Thus explaining that you know that there is a diversity of opinion in leftism rethus contradicting your first point...




Yes, you are being the usual anti-logiko
If there is one thing that I can rejoice upon...

Is that I put so much work in trying to show you how I'm right I am.. that the moment you will have a glimps of understanding, everything that I said up until now will rush back to you.

Not only that, but if you do that soon enough, this forum might still be here and you might bring people with you

It will be glorious.


:risiup:
 
read between the lines
Post automatically merged:

You : "No im not" Thus explaining that you know that there is a diversity of opinion contradicting your first point...
do you think there is more diversity of opinion if we include right wingers on top of leftists or less diversity of opinion?
Post automatically merged:

Is that I put so much work in trying to show you how I'm right I am.
to be fair, its not hard to be right when arguing with peeps like nameless or ryoQ, but it would help you if you would instead put work into properly reading the posts of the rest of us who arent unhinged right wingers lmao.
Post automatically merged:

I recall him declaring or heavily insinuating only leftist can be real One Piece fans when he left the first time. Would really explain why he so heavily correlates toxicity and grievance with One Piece with right wing.

Left wing political safe haven = only positive talk of OP it seems
Interesting (bullshit), but how would he explain my opinion of clown piss heavily decreasing (not sure if you remember me being this weird ass one piece defender back in our OG WG discord server) without me changing any of my political opionions at the same time?
Post automatically merged:

Because of censorship. People who posted or spoke about it were getting deleted and banned in droves cause it was increasing anti-israel sentiment. Also time and the holidays.

They did the same type of censorship for Thomas Crooks(Trump would-be assassin) cause everything about him was hard conservative, and Luigi Mangoine(CEO Brian Thompson) cause the U.S. hated the Healthcare industry more than they thought.

Also the passage of time.
meanwhile clowndace owens is pushing new conspiracies about charlie kirk every other day lmao
 
Last edited:
Top