Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
@Midnight Delight you were right 
NATO pulled out its troops out of Iraq today. I doubt NATO would engage in war against Iran directly, the country that went the most is the UK allowing America to use its bases for strikes, but thats about it.
I did read that countries like Japan,France,UK and others offered to help with the strait, but how that help manifests is yet to be seen.
Trump today called NATO cowards and his anti-European sentiment increased with this fiasco, so I expect him to be more aggressive on Greenland now than before.
I did read that countries like Japan,France,UK and others offered to help with the strait, but how that help manifests is yet to be seen.
Trump today called NATO cowards and his anti-European sentiment increased with this fiasco, so I expect him to be more aggressive on Greenland now than before.
@Midnight Delight you were right
For many, a direct engagement with Iran is a political suicide.
Countries are putting their interests first - it's not their war to fight. US created this mess and US should sort it out.
So you are right to say - NATO most likely won't engage directly.
However, it seems some will help indirectly like providing with anti drones technology or in opening the Hormuz.
US most likely won't ground troops on the mainland but we might see take over of those 3 islands through which Iran controls Hormuz. This is on the cards.
Countries are putting their interests first - it's not their war to fight. US created this mess and US should sort it out.
So you are right to say - NATO most likely won't engage directly.
However, it seems some will help indirectly like providing with anti drones technology or in opening the Hormuz.
US most likely won't ground troops on the mainland but we might see take over of those 3 islands through which Iran controls Hormuz. This is on the cards.
@Midnight Delight Why is Israel bombing Syria now? Don't they have a war to fight in Lebanon/Iran/Iraq?
Sharaa was a good boy and stopped shipments going to Hezbollah even.
Sharaa was a good boy and stopped shipments going to Hezbollah even.
Then he dies and a second civil war starts
Aoun and co would never have allowed it in the first place, because they know if the Syrian army enters they aren't leaving , Only Nabih can disarm Hezb realistically , or maybe his successor
Notice how the Amal Movement gave less support to Hezb than Sunni Jihadists did the past few weeks?
Aoun and co would never have allowed it in the first place, because they know if the Syrian army enters they aren't leaving , Only Nabih can disarm Hezb realistically , or maybe his successor
Notice how the Amal Movement gave less support to Hezb than Sunni Jihadists did the past few weeks?
