https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/1s1e2a1/_/obzzjfj
Everything is a rich man's trick. Because if these fuckers were poor no one would fuck their dick.

Crazy to see the dude play with a global economy the way he played with child rape victims, while the FBI and CIA helped kill and cover up everything.

This is also just disgustingly stupid war strategy. Any American trying to tell me that Cheeto Pedo is actually serious about winning anything, when you can guess what he's going to say next based on when the stock market opens and closes, is so full of shit.

Our economy was always fake trash, but this is a new low.

Obviously, trump is a loser and a puppet for worse evil, but, holy crap his allies must be absolutely sick of how easy it is to read him.

All Iran has to do is pay attention to when the stock market is opening and closing, and then assume that donald trump will do the exact opposite of what he said he would do.

Like it's not surprising Iran is winning when the treasonous terrorists that run the US are this freaking stupid and incapable of accepting blame for any of their own failures.

And how much time has Trump's cronies spent replacing actually talented individuals with shitty corporate suck up stooges?

Same reason that airplane crashed in new york. Incompetent leadership.

The one piece worldwide character popularity poll probably has more legitimate numbers than the current stock market.
 
you're literally undermining and downplaying other people's beliefs

going by your logic I should be telling you or others not to believe in God just because I m not religious myself
I'll still ban you if you undermine and downplay what others believe
Let's relax now, you have done enough.
Blax is not out of line because he explains that only his religion is right and other's are wrong. Undermining people's belief is what everyone does on this thread everyday... Just like I'm not out of line for explaining the someone's entire vision of the world is wrong. This is a sensitive thread, this place is done for precisely that.

We don't live in a world where religions are superior to other beliefs. These beliefs don't have a special status of protection that we should somehow follow, at least not in such context. If I want to talk about them in a critical lens like I do anyother belief system, I want to be able to do just that. Even if the critics are hard or not fair and even if I want to say that other people believe wrong.

Sensibility i not a question here. It's about principle. While I can understand why you don't want religion discussion here in this specific thread, there is no reason to stop this kind of talk altogether or you will have to recognize that this forum places religious beliefs to this weird superior place, which is contrary - by essence - to the beliefs system of people's whose beliefs are precisely opposed to religious beliefs. (antitheism for exemple)

Which, by logic, would be a form discrimination.
 
Let's relax now, you have done enough.
Blax is not out of line because he explains that only his religion is right and other's are wrong. Undermining people's belief is what everyone does on this thread everyday... Just like I'm not out of line for explaining the someone's entire vision of the world is wrong. This is a sensitive thread, this place is done for precisely that.

We don't live in a world where religions are superior to other beliefs. These beliefs don't have a special status of protection that we should somehow follow, at least not in such context. If I want to talk about them in a critical lens like I do anyother belief system, I want to be able to do just that. Even if the critics are hard or not fair and even if I want to say that other people believe wrong.

Sensibility i not a question here. It's about principle. While I can understand why you don't want religion discussion here in this specific thread, there is no reason to stop this kind of talk altogether or you will have to recognize that this forum places religious beliefs to this weird superior place, which is contrary - by essence - to the beliefs system of people's whose beliefs are precisely opposed to religious beliefs. (antitheism for exemple)

Which, by logic, would be a form discrimination.
Why does he need to constantly talk about his religion here and try to put it above other religions unprompted, though?
 
Why does he need to constantly talk about his religion here and try to put it above other religions unprompted, though?
Perhaps because other religious threads are dead. I don't know.

What I'm saying is not that I mind Blax not being able to express himself on religion on this specific thread. That's indeed a political thread and while I can understand spiritual talk sometimes, their place would be better in other.

What I'm saying is that if the reason for censoring blax is to say "don't say that other's beliefs are wrong" or "respect other's beliefs", I'm not ok with that precisely because respecting other's beliefs is contrary to what this thread is about in it's essence. We are here to debate precisely because we don't agree with other's belief on the way the world work or should work. That's called politics.

I'm someone who disagrees on pretty much all of religious beliefs and is highly conflictual with them. I'm not saying this to protect these beliefs but to protect free speech to this certain extent. Religion does not have and SHOULD NOT have a special status in this precise context and specific thread
 
Let's relax now, you have done enough.
Blax is not out of line because he explains that only his religion is right and other's are wrong. Undermining people's belief is what everyone does on this thread everyday... Just like I'm not out of line for explaining the someone's entire vision of the world is wrong. This is a sensitive thread, this place is done for precisely that.

We don't live in a world where religions are superior to other beliefs. These beliefs don't have a special status of protection that we should somehow follow, at least not in such context. If I want to talk about them in a critical lens like I do anyother belief system, I want to be able to do just that. Even if the critics are hard or not fair and even if I want to say that other people believe wrong.

Sensibility i not a question here. It's about principle. While I can understand why you don't want religion discussion here in this specific thread, there is no reason to stop this kind of talk altogether or you will have to recognize that this forum places religious beliefs to this weird superior place, which is contrary - by essence - to the beliefs system of people's whose beliefs are precisely opposed to religious beliefs. (antitheism for exemple)

Which, by logic, would be a form discrimination.
I appreciate it though Logiko
 
Perhaps because other religious threads are dead. I don't know.

What I'm saying is not that I mind Blax not being able to express himself on religion on this specific thread. That's indeed a political thread and while I can understand spiritual talk sometimes, their place would be better in other.

What I'm saying is that if the reason for censoring blax is to say "don't say that other's beliefs are wrong" or "respect other's beliefs", I'm not ok with that precisely because respecting other's beliefs is contrary to what this thread is about in it's essence. We are here to debate precisely because we don't agree with other's belief on the way the world work or should work. That's called politics.

I'm someone who disagrees on pretty much all of religious beliefs and is highly conflictual with them. I'm not saying this to protect these beliefs but to protect free speech to this certain extent. Religion does not have and SHOULD NOT have a special status in this precise context and specific thread
There's a difference between political debates and just trying to promote your religion out of nowhere though
 
There's a difference between political debates and just trying to promote your religion out of nowhere though
Of course and yeah. I can understand if Al wants to say to Blax "do that in another thread mate". That's perfectly valid, this is a political thread and this is out of place.

I'm just explaining that we should not invoke the sensibility of believers to do that. We are all believers to various beliefs, some peacefull other hamfull. Sensibility should not be a shield of protection specific to religious ones. Especially in a political thread.

If Blax starts to dehumanize, ok, that will be another matter, but that's not the case. Mind you, I'm not saying that for him, but for me also.
 

AL sama

Red Haired
Let's relax now, you have done enough.
Blax is not out of line because he explains that only his religion is right and other's are wrong. Undermining people's belief is what everyone does on this thread everyday... Just like I'm not out of line for explaining the someone's entire vision of the world is wrong. This is a sensitive thread, this place is done for precisely that.

We don't live in a world where religions are superior to other beliefs. These beliefs don't have a special status of protection that we should somehow follow, at least not in such context. If I want to talk about them in a critical lens like I do anyother belief system, I want to be able to do just that. Even if the critics are hard or not fair and even if I want to say that other people believe wrong.

Sensibility i not a question here. It's about principle. While I can understand why you don't want religion discussion here in this specific thread, there is no reason to stop this kind of talk altogether or you will have to recognize that this forum places religious beliefs to this weird superior place, which is contrary - by essence - to the beliefs system of people's whose beliefs are precisely opposed to religious beliefs. (antitheism for exemple)

Which, by logic, would be a form discrimination.
he is and has been out of line for a very long time

your opinion doesn't matter here
 

Reborn

Throughout Heaven & Earth,I alone am d Honored One
Of course and yeah. I can understand if Al wants to say to Blax "do that in another thread mate". That's perfectly valid, this is a political thread and this is out of place.

I'm just explaining that we should not invoke the sensibility of believers to do that. We are all believers to various beliefs, some peacefull other hamfull. Sensibility should not be a shield of protection specific to religious ones. Especially in a political thread.

If Blax starts to dehumanize, ok, that will be another matter, but that's not the case. Mind you, I'm not saying that for him, but for me also.
Actually it's nothing to do with his beliefs or him questioning or discussing other people religious beliefs as well.

It's how he's phrasing few things - "all other religions are false" and "Only Jesus can save you all".
 

Reborn

Throughout Heaven & Earth,I alone am d Honored One
I don't think people have issue with him talking about his faith and devotion to Christianity. It's fine.

It's also fine if he wants to inquire about other people religious beliefs and even cross question them.

But atleast don't put things like - Only my religion is true and whatever religion other people follow is false. Only my God can save people and not other people's God in which they believe in
 
Top