I don't think I'm hesitant lol
Why would you say that?
You've been hesistant all game, almost everything you posted was CWAC (repeating with others say, voting for someone without having reason but rather following other players votes ... )
Though I think that either Gianfi or Sera might be Cin's scummate if we consider Cin to be scum. And maybe Fuji too since he left him out when he questioned why Sera and Gianfi might be mafia. So, he might have mixed this up a little.
I haven't noticed anything weird about Drago's posts though
see this one, you were the only one suggesting Cin has scummates, even though you weren't the one who build the case on him ... all other players just took a step back to figure out excatly what type of scum Cin is ... I see this as an attempt to put more pressure to convey town for cinera lynch although this early in DP1.
I think Beta is town this time. He trying to lead the town with this Drago lynch. He doesnโt really do that when he is scum.
And he always acts scummy no matter his alignment. lol
CWAC again, here, you state the obvious, maybe hoping to let town think you have town vibes coming out of you ... you also state that you don't think beta is scum, none of us think that, we said beta acts scummy regardless of his alignment but we didn't say he might not be scum, you, on the contrary seem to be safe with suggesting beta is not scum.
I think we should lynch Cinera He is kinda sus to me with all these survivor stuff
And now Neutral because of this Nat stuff
Going for the easy target again, Cinera ... better to lynch a third and call it a day than to investigate other possible scum and end up slaying mafia ... right?
also, NW is always an alternative (since JDB seemed legitimite town and town would trust him right?) in case the Cin lynch didn't go as planned ... I mean, what's better than mislynching a townie and blaming an already strong looking townie for the mislynch?
I might misunderstand what a survivor is then
They win if they survive till the end right? Shouldn't we lynch them since they are a third party?
Pushing for cinera lynch the third time, although people already know cin is scum, an indie, but town wants to take mafia D1, any mafia would want to end the day when town catches an indie ... because if they sus a townie ... mafia will be joining in the wagon ... if they caught mafia, his scummates will try to diverge attention from far away ... but an indie is a golden chance for mafia to earn town cred AND keep a low profile .... I think this is why you are trying so hard for the Cinera lynch, even more than the people who caught his slip.
What do I need to explain? The only thing I can say is that I agree with Nat on Cinera being scum. That's all.
"I agree because X said so" see the pattern?
trying to pocket people is also a scum sign.
as summary:
- You used CWAC a lot.
- most of your posts are after the cin incident, what's even more interesting, 90% of them are just saying lynch Cin, an obvious scum.
- never have I seen you give reads or susing anyone or giving any bold statements ... except for NW who you made a quick retreat from when his argument with jew was finalized as "Language barrier"
- You like people to think YOU ARE NOT SURE and YOU ARE DOING THE SAME THING ANOTHER PLAYER IS DOING, probably in an attempt to keep a low profile and not get questioned .... a scummy thing to do IMO.
- You tried to pocket NAT, even though we are not sure if she's town or not, Nat's always like this, you should know better.
- your opening post was to urge people to participate ... although put in the form of "why did people choose this time when they are not here?"
- you knew beta is a low lying fruit, so you went for cin, a low lying 3rd.
I think you are scum, I think you have some newbies in your team, and I think that's why you want to end this as quick as possible.
[automerge]1599388837[/automerge]
forgot this again



