Which already takes the absoluteness of a title away. And no, what does it say about Kaidou? Always bet on him in a 1vs1, the strongest creature. It´s an absolute statement, no matter how you try to spin it. Well, we know it´s not absolute though, hence contradictory.
That´s your assumption, which is fair, but it´s once again nothing absolute because the lines are rather blurry. If Roger has nothing else, is he a swordsman only? If someone has a DF but uses it with a sword, is he a swordsman and nothing more?
People try to complicate things when it suits them and simplify things when it suits them.
Then you get definitions like "someone uses a sword = swordsman", like Stephen Paul, official translator, claimed. Well, if so, pretty much every schmuck to every top tier fits that bill.
Or i have read "if someone is the strongest when they are using a sword", well, once again, if you are not a complete idiot in using one, you are always the strongest when using it, if nothing else, it provides you an additional layer of protection against almost everything.
That´s what bothers me, people ignore WB and BM because it suits them, but Shanks not.
Can´t have it both ways.
Joke? No, but not as absolute fact as people claim, once again, WB has proven that. If something has circumstances to it, it´s already, by definition, not absolute.
Apparently yes, because it´s pretty straightforward, since context does not exist i guess, so let me play the translator.
WB is someone reminiscing of the past, the first thing he says is
this, alluding to Roger.
Once again talking
about the past, something he remembers clear as day, yet many have forgotten.
Once again alluding to the past and his legendary battles with Roger.
And
once again, alluding to the legend of Roger era, connecting what he said before with Roger, Garp, SEngoku era not many remembering, while he clearly does, because it passed very quickly for him.
In contrast, something that was a monumental thing in the new era, namely Shanks vs Mihawk, is still very much new to him.
It´s something really easy to understand and is supposed to characterize Whitebeard as the guy he is, yet power level fanatics (not necessarily including you) have misconstrued this many times.
Just pointing out the dude remembers things.
You can argue that WB talking about Mihawk vs Shanks to contrast the passage of time in regard to the Roger era, meaning he chooses to point that out, means something, but you can also easily argue that it´s simply a thing of context since he is talking to Shanks, hence has to use something Shanks was involved in.
I am not arguing against either choice since it´s exactly that, a choice.
You think it´s not the same, once again different issue.
Not that it has anything to do with that right now, we are talking about Shanks getting accepted as a Yonkou, meaning the public, which Morgan is a significant part of, even controls to a certain extent.
Fodder is a challenge?
No, what you get if you are reading between the lines is "Fighting someone hurt would be dishonorable".
You can make the same argument why Mihawk has never gone after Whitebeard, or Kaidou, or any other top tier if he was so bored, so no.
Ehm, you are making my point for me.
My point was, Shanks fighting Mihawk was not enough for people to consider him a Yonkou 12 years ago, yet BB beating Marco was.
Sure, you can make the point that BB knew the territories, but the deciding factor was him beating Marco, which
Zou once again underlines.
"BB had the strength to become Yonkou two years back", ehm these two panels
1 and
2 would disagree with you.
Meaning fighting Mihawk was not enough, only after Shanks started competing he was counted as such.
If they both were full out top tiers, it would pretty much surpass beating Marco or Luffy beating Cracker and Katakuri.