Character Discussion Mihawk is criminally underrated

Is Mihawk a Top Tier?


  • Total voters
    115
#61
I don't see any lies. I just see a pathetic guy refusing to accept the CLEAR facts and resorting to trolling.
And btw if you didn't know, Haki is allowed in a duel between swordsmen, in fact anything is allowed. It doesn't matter what Shanks has as long as he classified as a swordsman.




Even Fujitora and Law classify as swordsmen for example. Do the math. I'm saying all this but I'm arguing with a brick that will just ignore everything and continue trolling, it's sad lol...
You just said swordmaster, then accused me for not understanding the difference. You can trick only zoro fans with this swordmaster nonsense. Oda never said how Shanks fight, he said its not clear in sbs.

A fodder named Cabaji said he is a swordsman so? Shanks never said he is a swordsman. You need to show Shanks, not that fodder Cabaji. No one is talking about Cabaji. This is how desperate your Zoro fan arguments are.
 

nik87

Kitetsu Wanker
#62
You just said swordmaster, then accused me for not understanding the difference. You can trick only zoro fans with this swordmaster nonsense. Oda never said how Shanks fight, he said its not clear in sbs.

A fodder named Cabaji said he is a swordsman so? Shanks never said he is a swordsman. You need to show Shanks, not that fodder Cabaji. No one is talking about Cabaji. This is how desperate your Zoro fan arguments are.
We know how he fights tho - with a sword lol. He has shown it several times but continue to search for the impossible. :milaugh:
 

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
#63
You just said swordmaster, then accused me for not understanding the difference. You can trick only zoro fans with this swordmaster nonsense. Oda never said how Shanks fight, he said its not clear in sbs.

A fodder named Cabaji said he is a swordsman so? Shanks never said he is a swordsman. You need to show Shanks, not that fodder Cabaji. No one is talking about Cabaji. This is how desperate your Zoro fan arguments are.
Why has shanks had a sword for 30 plus years ?
 
#64
You just said swordmaster, then accused me for not understanding the difference. You can trick only zoro fans with this swordmaster nonsense. Oda never said how Shanks fight, he said its not clear in sbs.

A fodder named Cabaji said he is a swordsman so? Shanks never said he is a swordsman. You need to show Shanks, not that fodder Cabaji. No one is talking about Cabaji. This is how desperate your Zoro fan arguments are.
The point is, if you uses a swors regularly, then you are automatically a swordsman no matter what kind of fighting style you have, the manga suggests so
[GALLERY=media, 348][/GALLERY]
Kaku was a proficient rokushiki user, im pretty sure he could fight with only kicks as he was shown of capable of doing some dangerous kick, and yet he called himself a swordsman.

If you're still that delusional, then answer this question:
"Why would Shank even bother to get a sword if he's not a swordsman?"

And i've been searching on "Oda says he doesnt know how shanks fight", tell me the source lol, i can't find it anywhere. But even if true, in no means Shanks is not a swordsman, it could be that Oda has yet to decide whether Shanks have any other fighting ability (like rokushiki maybe?) or not

and you're too focusing on that point, you missed my first three points lol? Can you refute that?
 
#65
You just said swordmaster, then accused me for not understanding the difference. You can trick only zoro fans with this swordmaster nonsense. Oda never said how Shanks fight, he said its not clear in sbs.

A fodder named Cabaji said he is a swordsman so? Shanks never said he is a swordsman. You need to show Shanks, not that fodder Cabaji. No one is talking about Cabaji. This is how desperate your Zoro fan arguments are.
Shanks fights with a sword, it's his main fighting style therefore he is a swordsman, it's that simple. If Fujitora & Law can be called a swordsman, then so is Shanks 100%.
If Zoro or whatever other swordsman never said he was a swordsman, you would say : Oh we don't know if he is swordsman, he never said so.
"Mihawk looks forward to the day a swordmaster will surpass Shanks."
This literally implies Shanks is a swordmaster. Otherwise, let's assume Shanks isn't a swordsman. Then Mihawk waits for someone who is a swordsman but is stronger than Shanks ? I mean even if you twist it as Shanks isn't a swordsman bullshit, it's winning for Mihawk either way lmao.
Let alone the fact that Shanks was Mihawk's rival... I mean, we can keep going all day.
 
J

Jo_Ndule

#66
The point is, if you uses a swors regularly, then you are automatically a swordsman no matter what kind of fighting style you have, the manga suggests so
[GALLERY=media, 348][/GALLERY]
Kaku was a proficient rokushiki user, im pretty sure he could fight with only kicks as he was shown of capable of doing some dangerous kick, and yet he called himself a swordsman.

If you're still that delusional, then answer this question:
"Why would Shank even bother to get a sword if he's not a swordsman?"

And i've been searching on "Oda says he doesnt know how shanks fight", tell me the source lol, i can't find it anywhere. But even if true, in no means Shanks is not a swordsman, it could be that Oda has yet to decide whether Shanks have any other fighting ability (like rokushiki maybe?) or not

and you're too focusing on that point, you missed my first three points lol? Can you refute that?
Which Rule is that?
You're a swordman if oda says so or implies so
 
#70
Mihawk is overrated or underrated ?

depend who's you're asking ....

but for majority of one piece he have enough respect knowing his feats are not that great ....
yeah i just realized about it a moment ago, i just realized it's just "them" who constanly downplaying Mihawk for silly reasons, that's probably why i thought many here underrate Mihawk, but now i know the majority people here gives Mihawk respect he truly deserves
 
#71
Shanks fights with a sword, it's his main fighting style therefore he is a swordsman, it's that simple. If Fujitora & Law can be called a swordsman, then so is Shanks 100%.
If Zoro or whatever other swordsman never said he was a swordsman, you would say : Oh we don't know if he is swordsman, he never said so.
"Mihawk looks forward to the day a swordmaster will surpass Shanks."
This literally implies Shanks is a swordmaster. Otherwise, let's assume Shanks isn't a swordsman. Then Mihawk waits for someone who is a swordsman but is stronger than Shanks ? I mean even if you twist it as Shanks isn't a swordsman bullshit, it's winning for Mihawk either way lmao.
Let alone the fact that Shanks was Mihawk's rival... I mean, we can keep going all day.
Oda : ''I don't know how Shanks fight.''
ThaZorofan: ''no we know he is swordsman, so we can wank mihawk by using Shanks'':milaugh:
 
J

Jo_Ndule

#72
then answer my question lmao
Then prove your claim "using sword regularly means you're a swordman"

First your thread talks nonsense, mihawk isn't underrated
Saying "mihawk isn't top tier based on everything we have seen from him " isn't a downplay
Oda just failed to make Mihawk look like a solid top tier like admirals even.
Mihawk doesn't even look superior to Doffy/Kata. Facts!

Secondly,
Shanks was never below Mihawk. Headcanon from fanboys
Yonko Shanks is above Mihawk.
Rocks trio are yet to hype or take mihawk seriously like they do with Shanks.

Thirdly, WSS is a title where even mid/low high tiers can be candidates easily next to an emperor . A joke of a title
 
#73
Fenaker with fanfiction Japanese translations again... :suresure:Only zoro fans would believe your translations over the original one.

Now this Zoro fan says swordmaster was a wrong translation, the next is Oda wrote wrong the manga, Zoro is the MC.
so you don't have an answer :shame::shame:

<< 剣を業とする全ての者が畏れる「鷹の目」は、か つて刃を交えた「赤髪」を凌ぐ使い手の到来を、未来に見据えている…!>>


Verify it if you want and ask someone credible near u who can translate it for u u can even verify kanji and do what you want you can even ask stephen paul again :risitavirus::risitavirus::risitavirus: but in the end we know what will happen afterwards :shame::shame:
 
#75
so you don't have an answer :shame::shame:

<< 剣を業とする全ての者が畏れる「鷹の目」は、か つて刃を交えた「赤髪」を凌ぐ使い手の到来を、未来に見据えている…!>>


Verify it if you want and ask someone credible near u who can translate it for u u can even verify kanji and do what you want you can even ask stephen paul again :risitavirus::risitavirus::risitavirus: but in the end we know what will happen afterwards :shame::shame:
Why would I ask Paul when even Zoro fans were complaining about Paul, lmao.

https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/forum/threads/stephen-paul-on-slay-kill.8830/

He also said Mihawk is legend with a mistranslation, and I should ask him again? :suresure:

No one who are not Zoro fans, will believe your fanfic Zoro fan translation so look at the original translation.
 
#76
Oda : ''I don't know how Shanks fight.''
ThaZorofan: ''no we know he is swordsman, so we can wank mihawk by using Shanks'':milaugh:
Mihawk and Shanks had legendary duels as stated by WB.

You think they were dick measuring duels or something? How do you think Shanks fights if not with his fucking sword as he showed in the manga whenever he clashed with someone?
 
#78
Then prove your claim "using sword regularly means you're a swordman"

First your thread talks nonsense, mihawk isn't underrated
Saying "mihawk isn't top tier based on everything we have seen from him " isn't a downplay
Oda just failed to make Mihawk look like a solid top tier like admirals even.
Mihawk doesn't even look superior to Doffy/Kata. Facts!

Secondly,
Shanks was never below Mihawk. Headcanon from fanboys
Yonko Shanks is above Mihawk.
Rocks trio are yet to hype or take mihawk seriously like they do with Shanks.

Thirdly, WSS is a title where even mid/low high tiers can be candidates easily next to an emperor . A joke of a title
"Then prove your claim "using sword regularly means you're a swordman"

The definition of swordsman is a person who uses sword regularly, it's that simple lmao, or tell us what's your definition of swordsman?

"First your thread talks nonsense, mihawk isn't underrated"

I already explained it, just scroll up

"Oda just failed to make Mihawk look like a solid top tier like admirals even"

My second and third points indirectly explain how Oda is trying to tell us Mihawk is a Top Tier

"Shanks was never below Mihawk. Headcanon from fanboys"

again? you have no solid refutations? tell us please why would Shanks even bother to get a damn sword if he's not a swordsman

"Thirdly, WSS is a title where even mid/low high tiers can be candidates easily next to an emperor . A joke of a title"

See my third points. There are strong snipers and fishmen yet Oda never invented "World strongest Fishman" or such, It's just obvious Oda is implying the title of WSS, WSM, and WSC are the greatest
 
#80
Mihawk and Shanks had legendary duels as stated by WB.

You think they were dick measuring duels or something? How do you think Shanks fights if not with his fucking sword as he showed in the manga whenever he clashed with someone?
Lmao. WB said it was legends old, not legendary. You really can't read or lying on purpose, this is the second time already.

This guy here really believe pre-yonko Shanks vs mihawk would be a big fight for yonko, but same mihawk got owned by Vista and Crocodile like he is nothing.

Keep up with the actual manga. Yonko Shanks is on a different level now. He fought WB and Kaido, and Big mom says he can't beat Shanks without Elbaf. Mihawk never even fight a Yonko in his life, except marineford where he got owned by WB's third sidekick Vista, not even Marco. The level of your opponents shows your level. Mihawk never fought a top tier, so you can't prove he is Yonko level.
 
Top