Real.
This "older one was better" mentality is very prelavent in humans, not only just in One Piece community.
People aways say sequels are worse than the original. It happens so many times, you start to wonder, are they right?
If you do the math, the chances of sequels ALWAYS being worse is...
Teach being a clumsy goofball is part of his charm
Why can't you see that?
The word "aura" should just be deleted from existence.
It's corrupting ya'll brains.
Joyboy's haki is being compared to Shanks's by giants who lived for 200 years.
That's a W in my book. That just further strengthens my belief that Shanks has the strongest haki right now in the verse. (maybe below Imu)
Zoro ain't all that.
He was not even featured among the most relevant characters of One Piece in the latest chapter.
Deuteragonist my ass. Nami has more screentime than him.
Statements about Zoro from decades ago don't matter shit.
However you don't really see such long mangas as One Piece, so I don't think it's fair to judge One Piece art falling off like that.
One Piece has has been getting better and better to and peaked around Fishman Island, Punk Hazard. That's already many many years into the series.
Find me another...
My favorite unsolved mystery is who threw the paper at Chopper in Punk Hazard.
Some people theorize it was Monet, some say it was Law.
We never really got the answer to that and I don't mind it. Some mystery never hurts
This is all cool and interesting, but this pointing system clearly favors those with few screentimes sometimes.
How is Brook who literally did nothing this arc above Zoro?
I know Zoro had lot of Ls, but he also had lot of Ws. There is just no way Brook's "performance" (of what, doing nothing) is...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.