[FNZ] Light game Game 01 : One Piece Wano Kuni act 2
- Thread starter Rej
- Start date
- Status
Well didn't stated otherwise. We're all doing the same thing considering it's the start of the phase and we need to lure the scum out. Speaking of which, calling out
@Noctis
@Jiihad
@Kiwipom
@Gambit
@Dark Admiral
Say something
@Noctis
@Jiihad
@Kiwipom
@Gambit
@Dark Admiral
Say something
Sudden jump on bogards call? Who's scummy now?
I see a lot of interactions going on here amd it's pretty dishonest to say that I am not flustered on the volume of thy posts. I am kinda rusty as it's been months since I last played a game. But the tone of the press simply insinuates that Kiwi was being moderately dragged by some players as scum when there's nothing wrong with her statement.
I mean, there constituted a slight exchange of omgus but not solid enough to be viewed as scum.
Tac and bogard parade of posts do not stand as a grand illusion of buddying. They simply presented clear motives on how to play the play. There have been less activity before they began talking.
These 3 I mentioned are clesr to my sight. .
Now why the fuck is Al being included in the scum list? Lmao
Lemme go to the other pages..
This one here I agree the most.. I alrdy mentioned that Tac and Bogard did not have anything under the roots.. Having been calling that out to attract conspiracy is a perfect manner to illustrate a wolf on their backs.. Let's figure out who amongst the players Law has less interaction with and we may put an end to this demise.
I mean, there constituted a slight exchange of omgus but not solid enough to be viewed as scum.
Tac and bogard parade of posts do not stand as a grand illusion of buddying. They simply presented clear motives on how to play the play. There have been less activity before they began talking.
These 3 I mentioned are clesr to my sight. .
Now why the fuck is Al being included in the scum list? Lmao
Lemme go to the other pages..
Post automatically merged:
This one here I agree the most.. I alrdy mentioned that Tac and Bogard did not have anything under the roots.. Having been calling that out to attract conspiracy is a perfect manner to illustrate a wolf on their backs.. Let's figure out who amongst the players Law has less interaction with and we may put an end to this demise.
Last edited:
First off, what intentions is he opened about? And I doubt that he's not cautious, given this man literally pulled a back-up plan for why he was acting scummy, it was all a plot to get a read on Bogard, and after he does, he votes for someone else. I think you're making this way too black and white in the first paragraph of this and you're basing your read based on how you think a typical mafia would approach a situation. You're describing newb scum.
What crazy thing did TAC do anyway? I don't get that part.
I mean I can't really comment on your second line, it's more of you reading my push as scummy rather than you town reading TAC and scum reading me for pushing a town here, so I'm not sure how you even want me to engage with this other than saying that's generally a bad way of approaching a read.
Third paragraph, again, you are ascribing a general perception of how scum would act, which is not exactly a good metric for evaluating someone. Think of it like this, there's no general personality to a scum player. And here, judging by your description, wouldn't that clear me as town? I haven't focused on Bogard, which you think to be universally scum read, although only 3 people said anything about him, and second, I am on my target and have had an unwavering stance. You can't help but town read me deep down :D
=========
How do you know there's a godfather in the setup?
========
How do you know there's a godfather in the setup?
=========
Don't really think that's a fair assessment of my play. It's not like I sat on TAC the whole day, I mentioned townreads on Kiwi and Jiihad, some scum read towards Bogard and Dark, and that's 4/10 players, provided that the remainder are mostly low posters that have NAI content.
========
My read on him was that as mafia, he wouldn't have raised awareness to a lurker slot and painting him scummy like that, because he himself is a lurker. So there's a lack of self awareness that is more indicative of town. Because he would obviously not post that as scum if he was also a lurker, he needs to cast doubt on actives or just *be there*
========
Again, what about my play has marked onto you as "self-aware" lol. I don't really get what your metric is, I've been pushing my scum reads, requested people move their votes, if I'm self-aware, wouldn't I want to be hiding? I don't think you're making a proper evaluation here, if you wanted me to develop on my TCA read, you should've asked, but you're jumping the gun on no basis, I feel like. If you have something that's not clear, ask me to expound on it, why aren't you trying to discern my alignment at all here? Your crux of the case is that I've pushed TCA which you perceived as town.
=========
What crazy thing did TAC do anyway? I don't get that part.
I mean I can't really comment on your second line, it's more of you reading my push as scummy rather than you town reading TAC and scum reading me for pushing a town here, so I'm not sure how you even want me to engage with this other than saying that's generally a bad way of approaching a read.
Third paragraph, again, you are ascribing a general perception of how scum would act, which is not exactly a good metric for evaluating someone. Think of it like this, there's no general personality to a scum player. And here, judging by your description, wouldn't that clear me as town? I haven't focused on Bogard, which you think to be universally scum read, although only 3 people said anything about him, and second, I am on my target and have had an unwavering stance. You can't help but town read me deep down :D
=========
How do you know there's a godfather in the setup?
========
How do you know there's a godfather in the setup?
=========
Don't really think that's a fair assessment of my play. It's not like I sat on TAC the whole day, I mentioned townreads on Kiwi and Jiihad, some scum read towards Bogard and Dark, and that's 4/10 players, provided that the remainder are mostly low posters that have NAI content.
========
My read on him was that as mafia, he wouldn't have raised awareness to a lurker slot and painting him scummy like that, because he himself is a lurker. So there's a lack of self awareness that is more indicative of town. Because he would obviously not post that as scum if he was also a lurker, he needs to cast doubt on actives or just *be there*
========
Again, what about my play has marked onto you as "self-aware" lol. I don't really get what your metric is, I've been pushing my scum reads, requested people move their votes, if I'm self-aware, wouldn't I want to be hiding? I don't think you're making a proper evaluation here, if you wanted me to develop on my TCA read, you should've asked, but you're jumping the gun on no basis, I feel like. If you have something that's not clear, ask me to expound on it, why aren't you trying to discern my alignment at all here? Your crux of the case is that I've pushed TCA which you perceived as town.
=========
- Status