Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei must go gaolang > your fav is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
was more or less joking there
thought that was apparent by the soy remark
but yea carrot has tendency to ignore points due to his inability to defend his absurd liberal nonsense
dude just said shut up science at numerous points
or shut up, your alt right or a nazi
he's a textbook twitter leftist
and that's what makes him so annoying
No I'm not annoyed, I'm just like we say in france "blasé". You didn't understood what you googled.
I'll do as I please, thank you dear sir.
"that you accept them them as their birth sex ?" Wuat ?
No I just like to give a second chance to people, perhaps its me who don't understand.
But I think that I've given enough chances to both of you, so I will consider you as the same brand as you have the same ideas.
I'll do as I please, thank you dear sir.
"that you accept them them as their birth sex ?" Wuat ?
No I just like to give a second chance to people, perhaps its me who don't understand.
But I think that I've given enough chances to both of you, so I will consider you as the same brand as you have the same ideas.
There was an experiment conducted where people used literature like Hitler's Mein Kampf, substituted words and phrases with woke terms and attempted to be successfully peer reviewed. In some cases, it was successful.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair
What was i supposed to google then
I looked up
the term that you mentioned
I cant read your mind to know what was the intended thing, im supposed to be searching up
I dont speak french
nor does many here why would anyone have any refefernce for what blasé means outside of you and that toph chick
im not even making a bad point
im just saying make a argument or dont bother communicating
if you cant explain yourself then just dont reply, it's that simple
instead you reply by shaming people for whatever and it ends with you looking like a idiot
Should of worded it better
I was trying to explain what nameless meant
he was saying that you accept their chosen sex instead of birth one
and that's not scientific
those are terms that equate to each other
I never called you a commie but all those terms there are not mutually exclusive
excluding alien obviously
but you can be woke,sjw,twitter lefist,liberal and a commie cause none of those really conflict each other that much
I looked up
the term that you mentioned
I cant read your mind to know what was the intended thing, im supposed to be searching up
I dont speak french
nor does many here why would anyone have any refefernce for what blasé means outside of you and that toph chick
im not even making a bad point
im just saying make a argument or dont bother communicating
if you cant explain yourself then just dont reply, it's that simple
instead you reply by shaming people for whatever and it ends with you looking like a idiot
Should of worded it better
I was trying to explain what nameless meant
he was saying that you accept their chosen sex instead of birth one
and that's not scientific
Post automatically merged:
those are terms that equate to each other
I never called you a commie but all those terms there are not mutually exclusive
excluding alien obviously
but you can be woke,sjw,twitter lefist,liberal and a commie cause none of those really conflict each other that much
Last edited:
Ok.
I'll explain to you for the last time something about the scientificity of social science.
So read closely please.
I'll quote and sum up a great french video on the subject:
---
The popperian model is (in short) falsificationism. Its a theoretical model that is telling us that what makes a scientific theory SCIENTIFIC is not its capacity to make observations but its capacity to be REFUTABLE in experimentation and or observations.
It's what we call "the empirical vulnerability."
The problem with that model is that it take only into account what is said to be "UNIVERSAL LAWS" (that it is supposed to be valid everywhere, at all times and in all places) like the theory of relativity or the 4 foundamental forces.
For Passeron (a french sociologist) Social sciences don't have this propriety. Its impossible to get universal law that would value for all societies everywhere at all time.
That's why social science (soft sciences) are always dependant of a precise historicosocial context. This is what differenciate hard science and social sciences (especially sociology).
Hard science work with pure experimental models and are falsifiable because universal
While
Soft science work on deictic models. (deictic means that you need to have a precise context to make sense)
Both are scientific, they are just using different model
---
Do you understand ? Or do you need examples ?
Last edited:
