Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang>jurota i refuse to pay my taxes imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win tax is the best thing ever happened to us they tried to kill trump because he's the good guy trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
Nah disagree, but whatever, I'm not well-versed in how to stop it legally and "thoroughly" anyway.
And even if we do, it feels like there are other possibilities to pay for sex if people really want to. Like more "high range" prostitution, or just tourism to neighboring countries.
Porn could be an even more controversial topic
I watched a vlog of an actress who said her bank accounts were getting terminated when someone was founding out about her "activities" that they (the banks) "wouldn't cooperate with". That's a witch hunt !
And even if we do, it feels like there are other possibilities to pay for sex if people really want to. Like more "high range" prostitution, or just tourism to neighboring countries.
Porn could be an even more controversial topic
I watched a vlog of an actress who said her bank accounts were getting terminated when someone was founding out about her "activities" that they (the banks) "wouldn't cooperate with". That's a witch hunt !
I've heard about these claims. And to be fair, it's alright from a control perspective. But do the end really always justify the means ? I'm sure there are other layers of debate than this. On the other hand, I wonder if the politicians who claim to be okay with the ban aren't just saying it for electoral reasons to get more people's votes with them.
How is it in countries where it's legal btw ? Is it really "controlled" ? Or just taxed ?
How is it in countries where it's legal btw ? Is it really "controlled" ? Or just taxed ?
If you make something illegal you make it hard to control and monitor
Sex traficking skyrockets, drug abuse, physical abuse and so on
If you make it legal, as a buisness that pays tax. Workers there are protected by law and medical care, cash goes into tax for the state, there is less abuse bcs it is legal, traficking drops because you no longer need to force women to do it illegaly.
There will always be prostitution, always, the question is why should criminals benefit from it and not thw state?
Look at prohibition, perfecr example od what happsns when you ban something
Sex traficking skyrockets, drug abuse, physical abuse and so on
If you make it legal, as a buisness that pays tax. Workers there are protected by law and medical care, cash goes into tax for the state, there is less abuse bcs it is legal, traficking drops because you no longer need to force women to do it illegaly.
There will always be prostitution, always, the question is why should criminals benefit from it and not thw state?
Look at prohibition, perfecr example od what happsns when you ban something
there is no really difference if the government *regulates* prostitution bc it's inevitably prone to corruption, bribery and overlook abuses so it's better to keep it illegal altogether as there will more deterrent and barries to run it
plus most women involved in prostitution are either in desperate financial position or got trafficked/groomed, it's very clear they are not doing this bc it's empowering or something
even in porn industry, the behind the scenes actions show how the hard struggle and the abuse women suffered :(
plus most women involved in prostitution are either in desperate financial position or got trafficked/groomed, it's very clear they are not doing this bc it's empowering or something
even in porn industry, the behind the scenes actions show how the hard struggle and the abuse women suffered :(
