Controversial General Political Discussion

[Logiko]

That's exactly why you should be humble though. In such a nasty world where people mock and jeer for any little thing, the best thing you can do is be different and be more kind and willing to change and admit you're wrong.
Being belligerent won't convince anyone on what you're trying to say.

Yes I know. That's why I changed my strategy. I now only resort to patronizing and snarky comment when I'm tired of explaining nicely three times the same things.

But you have to be aware of the differences between a real and legitimate/respectfull ethical or political remark and a patronizing/snarky one.

This for ex:

So you are willing to listen while understanding that like me or anyone else, you can have biases created by the systems of domination that structure our thoughts and education ?

If so then yes. It was ableist. And it's ok. Now you know we must avoid to do it.

This was a genuine question, with a political statement based on materialist thinking.

There was a conveyed message yes (in this case "Are you willing to take a political remark rationnally and not personnaly?") but it was not disrespectfull.

And what you replied was :
>>>

Logiko. Shut the fuck up. Seriously

I'm not pasting your argument into fucking ChatGPT if that's what you're asking

Then what prompt are you using to understand my behavior?

 

[Ravagerblade]

I think it's very telling about the people here, Trying to Justify his murder just because of what he "says". Like You Don't have the Moral High Ground. At the very core of this is a Man who very clearly debated the other side of the Political spectrum, like how it's supposed to be, But the other side couldn't do the same at the end of the day.

 

[Monster Zoro's Tesla Supplier]

Yes I know. That's why I changed my strategy. I now only resort to patronizing and snarky comment when I'm tired of explaining nicely three times the same things.

But you have to be aware of the differences between a real and legitimate/respectfull ethical or political remark and a patronizing/snarky one.

This for ex:

This was a genuine question, with a political statement based on materialist thinking.

There was a conveyed message yes (in this case "Are you willing to take a political remark rationnally and not personnaly?") but it was not disrespectfull.

And what you replied was :
>>>




Then what prompt are you using to understand my behavior?

You called me a bigot. I don't take kindly to that. I won't apologize to you until you apologize to me.

 

[HerreraIsBack]

And?

And what?

 

[Logiko]

I think it's very telling about the people here, Trying to Justify his murder just because of what he "says". Like You Don't have the Moral High Ground. At the very core of this is a Man who very clearly debated the other side of the Political spectrum, like how it's supposed to be, But the other side couldn't do the same at the end of the day.

Words have consequences. real life consequences. He participated in a system that killed thousands of people

 

[RyoQ]

Then what prompt are you using to understand my behavior?

It sounds like you're so bad at advocating your own position you need ChatGPT

 

[Toby D. Dog]

And what?

Do you eat shellfish? Do you wear more than one type of fabric?

 

[HerreraIsBack]

I think it's very telling about the people here, Trying to Justify his murder just because of what he "says". Like You Don't have the Moral High Ground. At the very core of this is a Man who very clearly debated the other side of the Political spectrum, like how it's supposed to be, But the other side couldn't do the same at the end of the day.

The problem starts when they condemn free speech by saying words hurts just as much. They truly believe Kirk's words kills just as the shooter who killed him

 

[Reborn]

The motivation was political. It already is a political problem. Fingers will be pointed towards the democrat party. The same people were angry that dude missed the shot at Trump.

You know what


Your post reminded me of something - assassination gave Trump a strong reason to deploy guards in cities like he did in I guess two cities already.

And, if assassin turned out to be an immigrant.....then you all know what Trump would do.

Shit is messy and will get worse

 

[Logiko]

You called me a bigot.

When?

It sounds like you're so bad at advocating your own position you need ChatGPT

No, it's just that when I explain something, you don't understand it. I since I'm not a teacher, I don't know how to vulgarize effectively my knowledge.

I believe ChatGPT will do a better job with stuff like that. (although you need to be careful since it's just a generative AI, you must not use it as a tool to learn, but to guide you toward more precise knowledge)

 

[Monkey D Theories]

Saying this shit while at the same time going after Miss Rachel who is god’s gift to this earth.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1965887308454101427

Abraham also directly challenged God when God was going to eradicate everyone in Sodom and Gomorrah.

Furthermore, the Torah is full of arcane rules with little to no meaning apart from to set Jews aside from the rest of the world.

Ex. Kashrut and Shabbat laws

the gay thing is along the same lines. And if you don’t observe any of the other laws but hyperfixate on this one, you don’t really care about the Bible, you just hate gays.

 

[Toby D. Dog]

I think it's very telling about the people here, Trying to Justify his murder just because of what he "says". Like You Don't have the Moral High Ground. At the very core of this is a Man who very clearly debated the other side of the Political spectrum, like how it's supposed to be, But the other side couldn't do the same at the end of the day.

tell me exactly how I'm justifying it? Because I criticized his previous comments? being critical of him is very different than justifying political violence against him. That was his shtick not mine.

 

[HerreraIsBack]

You know what


Your post reminded me of something - assassination gave Trump a strong reason to deploy guards in cities like he did in I guess two cities already.

And, if assassin turned out to be an immigrant.....then you all know what Trump would do.

Shit is messy and will get worse

What assassination exactly? To me he just woke up a day and randomly decided DC needed to be safer

 

[Monster Zoro's Tesla Supplier]

When?



No, it's just that when I explain something, you don't understand it. I since I'm not a teacher, I don't know how to vulgarize effectively my knowledge.

I believe ChatGPT will do a better job with stuff like that. (although you need to be careful since it's just a generative AI, you must not use it as a tool to learn, but to guide you toward more precise knowledge)

you said I'm ableist

 

[Monkey D Theories]

Also, by Christian doctrine, most of the Jewish mitzvah are invalid so Christians especially shouldn’t care about this

 

[Toby D. Dog]

And if you don’t observe any of the other laws but hyperfixate on this one

obviously.

 

[RyoQ]

When?



No, it's just that when I explain something, you don't understand it. I since I'm not a teacher, I don't know how to vulgarize effectively my knowledge.

I believe ChatGPT will do a better job with stuff like that. (although you need to be careful since it's just a generative AI, you must not use it as a tool to learn, but to guide you toward more precise knowledge)

ChatGPT does an even worse job

 

[Monster Zoro's Tesla Supplier]

I think it's very telling about the people here, Trying to Justify his murder just because of what he "says". Like You Don't have the Moral High Ground. At the very core of this is a Man who very clearly debated the other side of the Political spectrum, like how it's supposed to be, But the other side couldn't do the same at the end of the day.

For the last time, we are not justifying his murder, we're saying that we have no reason to care about his murder when he himself undermined his death by saying it's just a necessity to uphold gun laws.
When will you get this?
If we laugh at his death, we aren't laughing at the death itself (death is a very, very terrible thing in most cases), but rather the ironic circumstances of his death.

 

[Ravagerblade]

The problem starts when they condemn free speech by saying words hurts just as much. They truly believe Kirk's words kills just as the shooter who killed him

Yup. C4N clearly shows this by his Reply.
The Slippery Slope isn't so Slippery as so much a Go to and How to do for these Ilk.

Post automatically merged: Thursday at 6:43 PM

For the last time, we are not justifying his murder, we're saying that we have no reason to care about his murder when he himself undermined his death by saying it's just a necessity to uphold gun laws.
When will you get this?
If we laugh at his death, we aren't laughing at the death itself (death is a very, very terrible thing in most cases), but rather the ironic circumstances of his death.

All you need to say is "It's sad he's dead, Don't condone it. Wasn't a fan." It's not hard.

 

[Logiko]

you said I'm ableist

When ?

Can you quote me the post please So I can see it? I don't remember doing that.

ChatGPT does an even worse job

Ok, then what type of source do you need to understand this ?
Studies ?
Video Essay ?
Blog ?
Twitter thread ?
Sketch ?

Tell me, I'll try to find that for you.

Yup. C4N clearly shows this by his Reply.
The Slippery Slope isn't so Slippery as so much a Go to and How to do for these Ilk.

It's reality mate. Words hurt. They have consequences. Systemic, structural and direct ones.