You know what


Your post reminded me of something - assassination gave Trump a strong reason to deploy guards in cities like he did in I guess two cities already.

And, if assassin turned out to be an immigrant.....then you all know what Trump would do.

Shit is messy and will get worse
What assassination exactly? To me he just woke up a day and randomly decided DC needed to be safer
If I remember right the stuff in DC was because of that kid named Big Balls getting beat up there, and that whole deployment in DC is being used as a ground zero to try to deploy them in other cities like Chicago. Main scratch is that it was easier to do in DC cause it's not a state and under direct federal control anyway.
 
When ?

Can you quote me the post please So I can see it? I don't remember doing that.


Ok, then what type of source do you need to understand this ?
Studies ?
Video Essay ?
Blog ?
Twitter thread ?
Sketch ?

Tell me, I'll try to find that for you.



It's reality mate. Words hurt. They have consequences. Systemic, structural and direct ones.
Never heard of Sticks and Stone?
You are still Justifying his Murder Just because you don't like what he said. You are part of the problem. Not the Solution you diluted nutcase.
 

Reborn

Throughout Heaven & Earth,I alone am d Honored One
I think it's very telling about the people here, Trying to Justify his murder just because of what he "says". Like You Don't have the Moral High Ground. At the very core of this is a Man who very clearly debated the other side of the Political spectrum, like how it's supposed to be, But the other side couldn't do the same at the end of the day.
I think almost everyone here (with exception of Logiko I guess) aren't justifying his death but are trying to say they don't feel sympathy for him.

Which I think it means is they don't support such violence and killing and feels it's wrong but at the same time they don't feel sympathy for kirk for the statements he made.
 
I think almost everyone here (with exception of Logiko I guess) aren't justifying his death but are trying to say they don't feel sympathy for him.

Which I think it means is they don't support such violence and killing and feels it's wrong but at the same time they don't feel sympathy for the kirk for the statements he made.
Sure doesn't sound like it. But whatever.
You're correct I wouldn't feel sympathy if Putin died either, Nor Kim. I understand no Sympathy part. But it feels like their going above and beyond to continue to either bash him etc.

But what I'm saying applies to more than just these Folks here.
 
I'm just asking why hating whites is just even though leftism says everyone's equal
It's not "just", it's "understandable". In the sense that I understand when people under systemic oppression are angry or hate (non systematically) people who are not under a systemic oppression.

And to understand why I say that, you need to understand leftism thinking. I can only do that by explaining stuff.. But you do not seem to understand what I say, so I'm asking if you need other sources.


Never heard of Sticks and Stone?
You are still Justifying his Murder Just because you don't like what he said. You are part of the problem. Not the Solution you diluted nutcase.
I'm not justifying anything. I think killing the guy was a dumb and useless move that will do more harm to leftism than it will do good.

Now, if you don't understand why words have consequences, ask chatgpt. Since everything I explain falls on death hears.


Not only that but they give 0 shit when certain people die. Like Israel massacre by Hamas
November 2023 >>>>
Let's be clear, the only resistance in Gaza is the Hamas. Now, the 7th, they actually made a WAR CRIME. Something that can be punished internationnaly because its an act of war that goes beyond the boundaries of international laws.
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
For the last time, we are not justifying his murder, we're saying that we have no reason to care about his murder when he himself undermined his death by saying it's just a necessity to uphold gun laws.
When will you get this?
If we laugh at his death, we aren't laughing at the death itself (death is a very, very terrible thing in most cases), but rather the ironic circumstances of his death.
I straight up said Charlie Kirk getting murdered was a bad thing, but they use every assumption possible to say I'm glorifying it. It's not about the morality of Kirk's circumstances....its about feeling right and morally superior.
 
You seem to not be a fan of the discussion of not feeling sympathy for him. Charlie’s death is not justified but due to the rhetoric he’d constantly spread, it’s hard to say he didn’t invite it himself. When you spread hate speech people hate you, crazy how that works.
Rhetoric or not, If you can't handle somebody's else's opinion or viewpoint during a debate, and you start screaming etc. You lost.
All of you guys talk about spreading hate, We don't see it as such. This all boils back down to viewpoints etc.
You make excuses by calling it as such.

Hate. It's nothing more than a widely used buzz word now.
 
Top