Is it possible to understand this post without the context that is lost because most of the conversation seems to be deleted?
Because I have no idea what he even means.
That bs was debunked ages ago
The spread of Christianity was hardly 'collateral damage'.
The spread of Christianity was often intentional and it hardly resulted in the saving of indigenous souls.
Non Christians were deliberately imprisoned coerced and tortured to get them to accepted Christianity.
Now that's a complete lie. People knew what was going on but wouldn't openly talk about it
Please heed your own advice
Awww manYou were looking forward to insult and threaten people
Because I have no idea what he even means.
That bs was debunked ages ago
The spread of Christianity was hardly 'collateral damage'.
The spread of Christianity was often intentional and it hardly resulted in the saving of indigenous souls.
Non Christians were deliberately imprisoned coerced and tortured to get them to accepted Christianity.
Now that's a complete lie. People knew what was going on but wouldn't openly talk about it
Please heed your own advice
Post automatically merged:
Awww manYou were looking forward to insult and threaten people