Europeans are real.
Native Indians are real.
Europeans had very little presence in India till Colonizers
Indo-Europeans ≠ Europeans
It's just how they are called based on the spread of the linguistic family pre-colonization
In the German language they are also called Indo-Germanics because the sub family furthest to the south east is the Indo-Aryan one ,and the sub family furthest to the north west is the Germanic family
To be fair here, the use of the concept of "indo-european" is only a linguistic concept. That is by the way subject to controversy among linguists themselves.
I'm aware that it's a descriptor of linguistic ties but as a matter of fact , this language family must have spread somehow, no?
A language cannot travel by itself, it's people who migrate and bring their language with them.
[automerge]1683061731[/automerge]
Because Hindus fought back. See what happened to Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh. Why did their population almost vanishes?
Ask the same question about pagan Europeans.😂
Where did they vanish to

[automerge]1683062134[/automerge]
There were and are many conquerors of different colors, races, faiths.
Demonizing a specific people or religion based on their role in conquests hundreds of years ago is unfair and bigoted.
[automerge]1683062308[/automerge]
which is true too but we can't use the harems to generalize and conclude that they compromised the basics of the religion too.. i'm truly ignorant in this regard.
Christian European monarchs weren't much better, they too twisted Christianity according to their liking.
That's rather a matter of powerful rulers being shitstains than a matter of religion.
[automerge]1683062455[/automerge]
A painting in the illustrated Akbarnama showed Akbar at the 2nd battle of Panipat, in 1526 CE, where Bairam Khan & Akbar colluded to behead Hemu. It depicted “Ghazi” Akbar & his army stacking up heads of Hemu's Hindu soldiers into a tower/
Average scene in any kind of ancient war.
Got nothing to do with Muslims supposedly being evil🙄
[automerge]1683062554[/automerge]
Non proselytizing meaning non exploitation of local populace to meet conversion targets laid by ministries abroad.
You're talking about Mother Teresa here?
[automerge]1683062683[/automerge]
That rarely happens.
First of all the intention to convert stems from the fact that Abrahamic religions lay heavy emphasis on hatred of non believers. Where there is hatred, Integration is rarely possible
You do kinda have a point.
Christianity and Islam are missionaric religions. The goal to spread the religion and to increase the number of followers has been there since day one.
[automerge]1683062769[/automerge]
Yet the church places heavy emphasis on pagans and proselytizing.
What happened to the native religions of Greeks, Australian aborigines, Vikings etc.
What happened to Goan Hindus at the hands of Portuguese settlers?
Also
These religious faiths were eradicated through coercion, force ,psychological warfare and violence.
[automerge]1683062820[/automerge]
Movies, state propaganda, etc are not valid sources for learning about a different culture/religion.
I completely agree with you here!
[automerge]1683062911[/automerge]
Bro I studied in christian convent
Ouch

explainsa lot tbh
[automerge]1683063020[/automerge]
Buy a Bible that is translated from Hebrew and read the new testament.
That's the first step of attempting conversion 😂😂😂 "here read the Bible, you may like it JOIN US JOIN US"
[automerge]1683063064[/automerge]
Bible is revised by the church and the church wants to increase it's follower count. Is it not?
The Bible was revised and edited countless times😂
[automerge]1683063218[/automerge]
Bro Azaan is not even the issue.
The issue starts with organized well planned stone pelting at our temples or religious processions on our festivals for which planning happens at the Mosques during Friday sermon
Such incidents may be happening but spreading even more hatred on both sides is not the way to solve these problems!
[automerge]1683063453[/automerge]
Which is straight up false. Those people are, from the way you describe it, just animals that were played by whoever is behind their actions into doing what they're doing.
Reminds me of the Saudi financed salafist preachers in German Muslim communities that riled up the worshippers. Or the Erdogan financed preachers in Turkish Muslim mosques in Germany who aim at turning the worshippers into loyal Erdogan voters.....
[automerge]1683063685[/automerge]
I don't have anything against Christ. I even respect him as equal to our Rishis(Wise sages).
But Church is a different thing altogether.
Yes that's true
[automerge]1683063730[/automerge]
This what happens in Indian churches
I can't figure what happens in the photo. are the people injured??
[automerge]1683064323[/automerge]
What do you mean "root language" ? Because there has never been an indo-european people nor has there been an indo-european language. Only theories of what the "mother language" could look like.
according to rhe theory the indo european root language emerged around 7000-8000 years ago , possibly somewhere around the black sea , some propose the Caucasus.
We can't really find that root language because the people of that time didn't write.
The earliest written Indo European languages are Sanskrit and Hethite( both not spoken in Europe)
The indo european root language is reconstructed by means of comparative linguistics.
Over time, indo european speaking peooles mixed with speakers if other languages, alao called substrate languages, each of them leaving some traces in the modern indo european languages.
Identity obsessed white supremacists ,on the other hand, abuse and exploit theseacientific findings for their often racist agendas.
Don't let their bullshit distract you from the actual research.