Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
H
So everyone got silence when Washington Times dropped this bomb about Israel War against Hamas being the one with lowest civilian death ratio of urban battles?
Israel's war against Hamas posts lower civilian-to-combatant death ratio than other urban battles - Washington Times
Hamas rejecting ceasarfire proposal that Israel agreed of
Biden: impasse on Israel ceasefire deal due to Hamas (thecanary.co)
Israel's war against Hamas posts lower civilian-to-combatant death ratio than other urban battles - Washington Times
Hamas rejecting ceasarfire proposal that Israel agreed of
Biden: impasse on Israel ceasefire deal due to Hamas (thecanary.co)
@Herrera95 Do you read the articles you post ?
I have been thinking about it for a while
I think the Zionists had a point. There was a need for Jewish unity and political autonomy at that point in history.
And I don’t think there was anything inherently wrong with Jews trying to seek that in Palestine, the land which has the greatest connection to the Jewish people.
I think the issue was their approach. They were racists and they were inspired by previous European colonial efforts. Rather than create a state out of lands that naturally had a Jewish majority, the Zionists wanted most, if not all, of Palestine.
Yet they did not have a majority in these lands. So they created one via the nakba, ethnically cleansing the Palestinians to create Israel.
[automerge]1717658208[/automerge]
in 1945, Jews had a majority in Jaffa. If they just created a state around Jaffa, then I don’t think that there would still be a conflict to this day.
I’m sure the Arabs would been mad that European immigrants created a state in the Arab heartland, but they would get over it. Especially if nobody was displaced in the state’s creation.
I bet if they tried they could have turned Jaffa into a billionaire tax haven, like the European micro states.
I think the Zionists had a point. There was a need for Jewish unity and political autonomy at that point in history.
And I don’t think there was anything inherently wrong with Jews trying to seek that in Palestine, the land which has the greatest connection to the Jewish people.
I think the issue was their approach. They were racists and they were inspired by previous European colonial efforts. Rather than create a state out of lands that naturally had a Jewish majority, the Zionists wanted most, if not all, of Palestine.
Yet they did not have a majority in these lands. So they created one via the nakba, ethnically cleansing the Palestinians to create Israel.
[automerge]1717658208[/automerge]
in 1945, Jews had a majority in Jaffa. If they just created a state around Jaffa, then I don’t think that there would still be a conflict to this day.
I’m sure the Arabs would been mad that European immigrants created a state in the Arab heartland, but they would get over it. Especially if nobody was displaced in the state’s creation.
I bet if they tried they could have turned Jaffa into a billionaire tax haven, like the European micro states.
Last edited:
