Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Not really, a tribal society works for small groups living in place with an abundance of resources. Problem is: can people hunt, fish, purify water, make a fire, make primitive tools, build shelters, navigate nature using stars, basic first aid skills/hygiene using whatever nature provides, sewing clothing and so on. It would take quite a few skills to pull this off.
Last edited:
No laws and easy mob mentality? Don't know bout you guys, but I'd instantly distance myself from yall and survive on my own. I can fish, skin animals, purity water, get water from trees, start a fire etc..
Everyone could easily die because of panic, hysteria, and dumbasses.
Having a moral compass or not isn't the point; it's about people limiting solutions, ignoring important details and history, and generalizing to hell because they view their morals as the only right option.
For example, someone can easily be against taking lives of any kind for any reason. Cool. They even believe that if you take a life, you should go to jail regardless if it was self defense. Alright I guess. If someone questions it, they should just say that it's just their subjective morals and move on, and shouldn't dictate how the justice system should handle punishments for taking lives. Instead, they start dictating that punishment for self defense is the only good option, and those who disagree must be horrible people that loves suffering.
Everyone could easily die because of panic, hysteria, and dumbasses.
Having a moral compass or not isn't the point; it's about people limiting solutions, ignoring important details and history, and generalizing to hell because they view their morals as the only right option.
For example, someone can easily be against taking lives of any kind for any reason. Cool. They even believe that if you take a life, you should go to jail regardless if it was self defense. Alright I guess. If someone questions it, they should just say that it's just their subjective morals and move on, and shouldn't dictate how the justice system should handle punishments for taking lives. Instead, they start dictating that punishment for self defense is the only good option, and those who disagree must be horrible people that loves suffering.
Sure, whatever. I'm glad to be seen as such by "You".
Means a tenth of the whole world to me.
Means a tenth of the whole world to me.
Well of course. But we humans tend to learn real fast in situations of danger. With the knowledge of what it possible I don't think it would take us that long to make our first fire.
The real problem is less the ressources and more the organization of the "society".
Survival in such an environement is a political problem. Do we choose to go for the sendetary path and risk the appropriation of ressources, exploitations and corruptions or, do we choose a more participative way.
Not really. There are many situations where there is no clear cut right or wrong, so people fill in the gap with their own subjective morals. Bottom line is that people use their own morals to judge how the world should be, and call everything that doesn't fit within their moral compass as wrong. Like Vegans trying to stop people and animals from eating other animals because they personally don't like it.
Not really, man. Being a lone wolf only works for a while. Eventually you will need help when you fall sick, get injured or hungry/thirsty.
[automerge]1742702942[/automerge]
We need to figure out how to solve the problem of food, water and shelter before we start killing each other over religion, politics and bullshit. Surviving in a desolate place isn't as easy as you might think. Depending where we are, we could all die very fast.
[automerge]1742702942[/automerge]
We need to figure out how to solve the problem of food, water and shelter before we start killing each other over religion, politics and bullshit. Surviving in a desolate place isn't as easy as you might think. Depending where we are, we could all die very fast.
Last edited:
It's complicated.
There is no good or bad. It's all a matter of material conditions and necessity of actions.
And how do you decide who gets what ?
How do you divide the tasks ?
Who chooses ?
Do you impose yourself ?
Do you let someelse lead ?
What if 50% of people think we should care less about wounded people ?
What if three people want to create a place where decisions are common ?
Do you share all ressources equally or do you give more to people who do more ?
Surviving is not just about fire and water. It's a political question.
It's the reason why surviving shows are popular.
There is no good or bad. It's all a matter of material conditions and necessity of actions.
And how do you decide who gets what ?
How do you divide the tasks ?
Who chooses ?
Do you impose yourself ?
Do you let someelse lead ?
What if 50% of people think we should care less about wounded people ?
What if three people want to create a place where decisions are common ?
Do you share all ressources equally or do you give more to people who do more ?
Surviving is not just about fire and water. It's a political question.
It's the reason why surviving shows are popular.
1-First we got have stuff(food,water,etc...) before we can even decide that.
2-Anyone will do what he can do. This is a no brainer.
3-Impose about what?
4-Most people will follow people that are competent.Uncle looks like a nice candidate since he can hunt/fish and has military/police background.
5-No idea what you are talking about here.
6-What?
7-I think people should first tend to their selves and then distribute goods based on individual need.
2-Anyone will do what he can do. This is a no brainer.
3-Impose about what?
4-Most people will follow people that are competent.Uncle looks like a nice candidate since he can hunt/fish and has military/police background.
5-No idea what you are talking about here.
6-What?
7-I think people should first tend to their selves and then distribute goods based on individual need.
Well good luck lol
------------------------------------
Anyway. Time to let this thread die. I've seen enough.
To the few leftists and One Piece fans here. Here is my advice to you :
Let this forum go.. There is nothing left for us here. I just saw someone saying that Parallels in One Piece are bad because... well they said so, and everyone agreed. So I would not worry about posters here, they won't last long in the community... or the community itself is cooked. And if it happens.. well too bad..
Let this part of the fanbase in their reactionnary and hatefull place and if you can, join a community with less hatred in their hearth and more concerns for oppressed people... and One Piece.
Or don't.. it's your choice.
This place is not a One Piece forum, it's a F. joke.
----------------
------------------------------------
Anyway. Time to let this thread die. I've seen enough.
To the few leftists and One Piece fans here. Here is my advice to you :
Let this forum go.. There is nothing left for us here. I just saw someone saying that Parallels in One Piece are bad because... well they said so, and everyone agreed. So I would not worry about posters here, they won't last long in the community... or the community itself is cooked. And if it happens.. well too bad..
Let this part of the fanbase in their reactionnary and hatefull place and if you can, join a community with less hatred in their hearth and more concerns for oppressed people... and One Piece.
Or don't.. it's your choice.
This place is not a One Piece forum, it's a F. joke.
----------------
Last edited:
Poltics and religion really brings the worst out of people.
There is a youtuber who speaks his mind. He has very firm opinions. His content has political, religious and historical touch but it's backed by his education and reports and facts. One of the most honest speaker I found on YouTube. He talks with reason.
He belongs to a conservative, religious Islamic society. So, you can imagine the backlash he receives because of his progressive ideas.
Few months ago, people deliberately clipped his videos to make reels and shorts to spread propaganda against him online.
Many who doesn't even watch his videos simply based their opinions about him on the basis of out of context reels and shorts
His family was attacked by gunmen and what worse was people openly declared threats and planned attack against him- a girl was asking to set an example out of him and asked people to kill him whenever opportunity presents, a guy on twitter planned to cut his private parts - a whole toxic narrative against him just not to criticize but to actually kill him.
He's still doing good. He's still making videos but point is insulting is nothing in comparison to whole toxic narrative which gets build in social media world these days. It's deliberately done to silent people, defame and sometimes even target them physically.
There is a youtuber who speaks his mind. He has very firm opinions. His content has political, religious and historical touch but it's backed by his education and reports and facts. One of the most honest speaker I found on YouTube. He talks with reason.
He belongs to a conservative, religious Islamic society. So, you can imagine the backlash he receives because of his progressive ideas.
Few months ago, people deliberately clipped his videos to make reels and shorts to spread propaganda against him online.
Many who doesn't even watch his videos simply based their opinions about him on the basis of out of context reels and shorts
His family was attacked by gunmen and what worse was people openly declared threats and planned attack against him- a girl was asking to set an example out of him and asked people to kill him whenever opportunity presents, a guy on twitter planned to cut his private parts - a whole toxic narrative against him just not to criticize but to actually kill him.
He's still doing good. He's still making videos but point is insulting is nothing in comparison to whole toxic narrative which gets build in social media world these days. It's deliberately done to silent people, defame and sometimes even target them physically.
