Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
You ask us to listen to a guy that spits confirmation biases, unverified data, uneducated opinions and fake information 24/7 about subjects he doesn't know anything about everyday of the week.
There is absolutely nothing in those video beside that. It's like looking at the guy screaming that pyramids are made by alien in the streets everyday with a hammer to beat any marginalize people passing through. It's slop content
Give us data, statistic, studies at least
There is absolutely nothing in those video beside that. It's like looking at the guy screaming that pyramids are made by alien in the streets everyday with a hammer to beat any marginalize people passing through. It's slop content
Give us data, statistic, studies at least
No, I do not expect every person who has the ability to effortlessly save kids from poverty and starvation, to do it, because the example of Charlie Kirk, Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and all the billionares and millionares who have not done it has shown people can not be expected to do that
However, just because I don't expect it, does not mean it is not what I want to happen
Saving kids, especially when you can do it effortlessly, is the bare minimim
Your heroes failed to hit that
However, just because I don't expect it, does not mean it is not what I want to happen
Saving kids, especially when you can do it effortlessly, is the bare minimim
Your heroes failed to hit that
Liberal scums are just less authoritarian and hypocritical. Gaza Riviera project is happening wether it's Kamala Harris or Donald Trump or Joe Biden. Maybe Bernie would have tried "something", but go figure, we never know what someone who won't call it a genocide would do.
With that said, liberals and soc-dems who are too scared to lose a few percentage of voters by calling it a genocide are complicit too.
"oh butb but butttt we need a few percentage from the far-right voters to win the elections, lessgo bipartisan issue"
When you quote Karl Marx then you're inherently trying to make a point. But you said that you were just repeating the sayings of your dad and afterwards said that it's because we could be interested somehow. Then you refused to argue in favor. Anyway, no point of keeping this discussion.
About the philosophers.
You are free to "talk shit" about the philosophers you don't like for any reason. It doesn't make it anti-philosophical by any made-up universal law. Philosophers themselves are/were doing it. Wether it's those who were alive at the same time and conversing or the ones who talked badly about the philosophers of other times.
How would you call him though ? How can you go from "I was wrong about Trump, he is a bad gringo but let's not call him a wannabe-dictator who supports big companies over people". The longer we wait, the more we know about his illegal deeds. Wether it's pedophilia or really anything else.
With that said, liberals and soc-dems who are too scared to lose a few percentage of voters by calling it a genocide are complicit too.
"oh butb but butttt we need a few percentage from the far-right voters to win the elections, lessgo bipartisan issue"
When you quote Karl Marx then you're inherently trying to make a point. But you said that you were just repeating the sayings of your dad and afterwards said that it's because we could be interested somehow. Then you refused to argue in favor. Anyway, no point of keeping this discussion.
About the philosophers.
You are free to "talk shit" about the philosophers you don't like for any reason. It doesn't make it anti-philosophical by any made-up universal law. Philosophers themselves are/were doing it. Wether it's those who were alive at the same time and conversing or the ones who talked badly about the philosophers of other times.
How would you call him though ? How can you go from "I was wrong about Trump, he is a bad gringo but let's not call him a wannabe-dictator who supports big companies over people". The longer we wait, the more we know about his illegal deeds. Wether it's pedophilia or really anything else.