Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Liberal scums are just less authoritarian and hypocritical. Gaza Riviera project is happening wether it's Kamala Harris or Donald Trump or Joe Biden. Maybe Bernie would have tried "something", but go figure, we never know what someone who won't call it a genocide would do.
With that said, liberals and soc-dems who are too scared to lose a few percentage of voters by calling it a genocide are complicit too.
"oh butb but butttt we need a few percentage from the far-right voters to win the elections, lessgo bipartisan issue"
When you quote Karl Marx then you're inherently trying to make a point. But you said that you were just repeating the sayings of your dad and afterwards said that it's because we could be interested somehow. Then you refused to argue in favor. Anyway, no point of keeping this discussion.
About the philosophers.
You are free to "talk shit" about the philosophers you don't like for any reason. It doesn't make it anti-philosophical by any made-up universal law. Philosophers themselves are/were doing it. Wether it's those who were alive at the same time and conversing or the ones who talked badly about the philosophers of other times.
How would you call him though ? How can you go from "I was wrong about Trump, he is a bad gringo but let's not call him a wannabe-dictator who supports big companies over people". The longer we wait, the more we know about his illegal deeds. Wether it's pedophilia or really anything else.
With that said, liberals and soc-dems who are too scared to lose a few percentage of voters by calling it a genocide are complicit too.
"oh butb but butttt we need a few percentage from the far-right voters to win the elections, lessgo bipartisan issue"
When you quote Karl Marx then you're inherently trying to make a point. But you said that you were just repeating the sayings of your dad and afterwards said that it's because we could be interested somehow. Then you refused to argue in favor. Anyway, no point of keeping this discussion.
About the philosophers.
You are free to "talk shit" about the philosophers you don't like for any reason. It doesn't make it anti-philosophical by any made-up universal law. Philosophers themselves are/were doing it. Wether it's those who were alive at the same time and conversing or the ones who talked badly about the philosophers of other times.
How would you call him though ? How can you go from "I was wrong about Trump, he is a bad gringo but let's not call him a wannabe-dictator who supports big companies over people". The longer we wait, the more we know about his illegal deeds. Wether it's pedophilia or really anything else.
Politicians are very precautious with calling anyone a fascist or nazi. They usually aren't very harsh against the far-right because they play the game of elections, popularity and votes. They'll try to bring the far-right votes to them by different strategies.
We ain't politicians though. And you can call a cat a cat. Or someone who likes a cat a cat lover without being responsable for the cat lover to go out of the way and be a zoophile who kills dogs to protect the cats.
We ain't politicians though. And you can call a cat a cat. Or someone who likes a cat a cat lover without being responsable for the cat lover to go out of the way and be a zoophile who kills dogs to protect the cats.
I don’t know about the thing you’re referencing, but I’m sure that conversation as well as the remarks below are not the only things he’s said about them…
You’re absolutely right, my friend… @NAMELESS @Ravagerblade Take a good look at the guy you’re mourning, bitter and hateful from start to finish just like you
[automerge]1757681020[/automerge]
Nah, but it’s not nearly as thorough as it should be, nor does it include a psych evaluation like we need…conservatives are so terrified that someone will take their automatic machine guns away, they’ve made it easy enough for a kid to take one to school and light up their classmates. The fact that righties can bear so many children dying from this kind of violence and STILL not do anything to protect them kinda says it all about where they stand when it comes to being productive members of society instead of soulless mongrels.
[automerge]1757681115[/automerge]
Well, just like Nameless would do, I’m not gonna let facts stand in the way of the conclusion I’ve drawn
[automerge]1757681020[/automerge]
Nah, but it’s not nearly as thorough as it should be, nor does it include a psych evaluation like we need…conservatives are so terrified that someone will take their automatic machine guns away, they’ve made it easy enough for a kid to take one to school and light up their classmates. The fact that righties can bear so many children dying from this kind of violence and STILL not do anything to protect them kinda says it all about where they stand when it comes to being productive members of society instead of soulless mongrels.
[automerge]1757681115[/automerge]
Well, just like Nameless would do, I’m not gonna let facts stand in the way of the conclusion I’ve drawn
I can’t believe I haven’t posted this here yet - I was in my supervisor’s office right after Charlie kicked it, and she was telling me how upset she and her husband were about it and how she felt bad for his wife and kids…and then she said, verbatim and unprompted, “As much as I want to kill Fauci (mispronounced as “Faw-see”) and Biden, they probably have grandkids who love them and would be said if they died”
I think this perfectly encapsulates what we’ve all been saying: right-wing assholes suffer from cognitive dissonance so severe, they’ll demand empathy in literally the same exact breath they use to invoke violence against anyone they don’t like. This was a mother of four telling a coworker that she wanted to kill two people immediately after one died, how are you supposed to have a rational conversation with someone that deranged??
I think this perfectly encapsulates what we’ve all been saying: right-wing assholes suffer from cognitive dissonance so severe, they’ll demand empathy in literally the same exact breath they use to invoke violence against anyone they don’t like. This was a mother of four telling a coworker that she wanted to kill two people immediately after one died, how are you supposed to have a rational conversation with someone that deranged??
It makes sense according to your first proposition. But I didn't expect to be insulted for a mere cat analogy 
Your point is that to call someone what they are is a "poor choice" though. This is the real political correctness.
Trump won because he faced a women twice. American mindset. Not because his supporters are rightfully called far-righties.
Your point is that to call someone what they are is a "poor choice" though. This is the real political correctness.
Trump won because he faced a women twice. American mindset. Not because his supporters are rightfully called far-righties.
Don’t go too far 
What you gonna do about it? Ban me? Oh wait... you can't. You are powerless 
It makes sense according to your first proposition. But I didn't expect to be insulted for a mere cat analogy
Your point is that to call someone what they are is a "poor choice" though. This is the real political correctness.
Trump won because he faced a women twice. American mindset. Not because his supporters are rightfully called far-righties.
Your point is that to call someone what they are is a "poor choice" though. This is the real political correctness.
Trump won because he faced a women twice. American mindset. Not because his supporters are rightfully called far-righties.
I am only talking about voters here. Not Trump and his administration.
I just did. What you gonna do about it? Ban me? Oh wait... you can't. You are powerless
My point is we don't know that all people who voted for Trump are Fascists. Clubbing them in form of generalization is bad choice just because of their voting choice
I am only talking about voters here. Not Trump and his administration.
What you gonna do about it? Ban me? Oh wait... you can't. You are powerless My point is we don't know that all people who voted for Trump are Fascists. Clubbing them in form of generalization is bad choice just because of their voting choice
I am only talking about voters here. Not Trump and his administration.
Strange, I feel like someone is talking, but I can't see their word and I don't have anyone on ignore
Who are you replying to ?
I never hated anyone. Not even the worst genociders.
You...... "thought?"
Unless you are explaining that for some reason, people were not aware of what he wanted to do when taking office, i'd say, most of them are at the very least fascist advocaters.
Not necessarily fascist, but friendly allies.
Who are you replying to ?
I never hated anyone. Not even the worst genociders.
You...... "thought?"
Unless you are explaining that for some reason, people were not aware of what he wanted to do when taking office, i'd say, most of them are at the very least fascist advocaters.
Not necessarily fascist, but friendly allies.