Controversial General Political Discussion

[Mathias]

You can call Trump whatever you want.


I am talking about generalized labelling of all those who voted Trump as Fascists.


Left in USA by repeatedly using Nazis and Fascists for half of their own population is simply alienating them further to the right.

Politicians are very precautious with calling anyone a fascist or nazi. They usually aren't very harsh against the far-right because they play the game of elections, popularity and votes. They'll try to bring the far-right votes to them by different strategies.

We ain't politicians though. And you can call a cat a cat. Or someone who likes a cat a cat lover without being responsable for the cat lover to go out of the way and be a zoophile who kills dogs to protect the cats.

 

[HerreraIsBack]

That's what I thought

Post automatically merged: Yesterday at 1:16 PM

Politicians are very precautious with calling anyone a fascist or nazi. They usually aren't very harsh against the far-right because they play the game of elections, popularity and votes. They'll try to bring the far-right votes to them by different strategies.

We ain't politicians though. And you can call a cat a cat. Or someone who likes a cat a cat lover without being responsable for the cat lover to go out of the way and be a zoophile who kills dogs to protect the cats.

Your lack of logic is incredible

 

[Jew D. Boy]

is this about the recent talk he had with apostate prophet? or was that a general topic of his beforehand as well?

I don’t know about the thing you’re referencing, but I’m sure that conversation as well as the remarks below are not the only things he’s said about them…

You’re absolutely right, my friend… @NAMELESS @Ravagerblade Take a good look at the guy you’re mourning, bitter and hateful from start to finish just like you

Post automatically merged: Friday at 1:43 PM

Nah, but it’s not nearly as thorough as it should be, nor does it include a psych evaluation like we need…conservatives are so terrified that someone will take their automatic machine guns away, they’ve made it easy enough for a kid to take one to school and light up their classmates. The fact that righties can bear so many children dying from this kind of violence and STILL not do anything to protect them kinda says it all about where they stand when it comes to being productive members of society instead of soulless mongrels.

Post automatically merged: Friday at 1:45 PM

Well, just like Nameless would do, I’m not gonna let facts stand in the way of the conclusion I’ve drawn

 

[Reborn]

Politicians are very precautious with calling anyone a fascist or nazi. They usually aren't very harsh against the far-right because they play the game of elections, popularity and votes. They'll try to bring the far-right votes to them by different strategies.

We ain't politicians though. And you can call a cat a cat. Or someone who likes a cat a cat lover without being responsable for the cat lover to go out of the way and be a zoophile who kills dogs to protect the cats.

Politicians are very precautious with calling anyone a fascist or nazi. They usually aren't very harsh against the far-right because they play the game of elections, popularity and votes. They'll try to bring the far-right votes to them by different strategies.

We ain't politicians though. And you can call a cat a cat. Or someone who likes a cat a cat lover without being responsable for the cat lover to go out of the way and be a zoophile who kills dogs to protect the cats.

French people make stupid theories


Mathias is French...

Mathias makes stupid theories


Does this makes sense to you?

If you want to make use of analogy to put your point across then atleast use something that fits the context

 

[RayanOO]

French people make stupid theories


Mathias is French...

Mathias makes stupid theories


Does this makes sense to you?

If you want to make use of analogy to put your point across then atleast use something that fits the context

Don’t go too far

 

[Jew D. Boy]

I can’t believe I haven’t posted this here yet - I was in my supervisor’s office right after Charlie kicked it, and she was telling me how upset she and her husband were about it and how she felt bad for his wife and kids…and then she said, verbatim and unprompted, “As much as I want to kill Fauci (mispronounced as “Faw-see”) and Biden, they probably have grandkids who love them and would be said if they died”
I think this perfectly encapsulates what we’ve all been saying: right-wing assholes suffer from cognitive dissonance so severe, they’ll demand empathy in literally the same exact breath they use to invoke violence against anyone they don’t like. This was a mother of four telling a coworker that she wanted to kill two people immediately after one died, how are you supposed to have a rational conversation with someone that deranged??

 

[Mathias]

French people make stupid theories


Mathias is French...

Mathias makes stupid theories


Does this makes sense to you?

If you want to make use of analogy to put your point across then atleast use something that fits the context

It makes sense according to your first proposition. But I didn't expect to be insulted for a mere cat analogy


Your point is that to call someone what they are is a "poor choice" though. This is the real political correctness.

Trump won because he faced a women twice. American mindset. Not because his supporters are rightfully called far-righties.

 

[AL sama]

Don’t go too far

he is simply spitting facts

 

[Reborn]

Don’t go too far

I just did. What you gonna do about it? Ban me? Oh wait... you can't. You are powerless

It makes sense according to your first proposition. But I didn't expect to be insulted for a mere cat analogy


Your point is that to call someone what they are is a "poor choice" though. This is the real political correctness.

Trump won because he faced a women twice. American mindset. Not because his supporters are rightfully called far-righties.

My point is we don't know that all people who voted for Trump are Fascists. Clubbing them in form of generalization is bad choice just because of their voting choice

I am only talking about voters here. Not Trump and his administration.

 

[Mathias]

I just did. What you gonna do about it? Ban me? Oh wait... you can't. You are powerless


My point is we don't know that all people who voted for Trump are Fascists. Clubbing them in form of generalization is bad choice just because of their voting choice

I am only talking about voters here. Not Trump and his administration.

« They aren’t all far-righties, but they all want a far-right leader »

 

[AL sama]

« They aren’t all far-righties, but they all want a far-right leader »

I think you are playing the dumb game here cause of your bias

that's clearly not Reborn's point

 

[Blax Blah]

@Logiko @Mathias there is some extremely peak stuff talked about here at 2:46:05, making pipelines from different ideologies to libertarian socialism

 

[Mathias]

I think you are playing the dumb game here cause of your bias

that's clearly not Reborn's point

Please let the man himself speak.

And I have no idea what my bias is.

 

[Logiko]

Strange, I feel like someone is talking, but I can't see their word and I don't have anyone on ignore

You’re so full of hate it’s wild

Who are you replying to ?

That's a buzz word coming from you. It has no meaning. Leftists decry Hate and yet give it out freely to those they think beneath them or not on their side.

I never hated anyone. Not even the worst genociders.

That's what I thought

You...... "thought?"

My point is we don't know that all people who voted for Trump are Fascists. Clubbing them in form of generalization is bad choice just because of their voting choice

Unless you are explaining that for some reason, people were not aware of what he wanted to do when taking office, i'd say, most of them are at the very least fascist advocaters.

Not necessarily fascist, but friendly allies.

 

[AL sama]

Please let the man himself speak.

weird but eh sure

 

[HerreraIsBack]

And I have no idea what my bias is.

 

[Reborn]

« They aren’t all far-righties, but they all want a far-right leader »

Not necessarily true.

Let's suppose 100 people voted for Trump.

There would be significant % of people who voted him just because of him belonging to Republican party. There are always party loyalists (right or left) who always votes for their own party regardless of the leadership.


Then, some voted because of his vision.

Some voted because they didn't like Biden or Harris (If people can vote for Biden or Harris just because they hated Trump and not because they liked Harris or Biden, then the opposite holds true as well)

Some voted because they got brainwashed or misguided by propaganda or fell for the narrative.

Some voted because they found themselves aligned with his manifesto (not the execution but the idea itself)

Only a small percentage of people who voted him would actually be fit to call Fascists.



Now, I don't know what you people are reading but I remember reading article on this so will share...

One of the reason why in past decade or so, Left is losing it's clout across the world is they started labelling people in form of generalization even on slightest of difference of opinion which actually ends up alienating many people and push them to the right.

Labelling people became a tool which actually got misused rather than actually serving its true purpose and it not only drifted people away to the right but it's significance got eroded as well.

 

[Logiko]

One of the reason why in past decade or so, Left is losing it's clout across the world is they started labelling people in form of generalization even on slightest of difference of opinion which actually ends up alienating many people and push them to the right.

Labelling people became a tool which actually got misused rather than actually serving its true purpose and it not only drifted people away to the right but it's significance got eroded as well.

Do you understand why we label people ?

 

[Reborn]

Do you understand why we label people ?

Do you understand it got misused?

If you people think throwing labels like candies are serving your purpose then be my guest.

But remember, left will continue to lose its base

 

[Uncle Van]

Not necessarily true.

Let's suppose 100 people voted for Trump.

There would be significant % of people who voted him just because of him belonging to Republican party. There are always party loyalists (right or left) who always votes for their own party regardless of the leadership.


Then, some voted because of his vision.

Some voted because they didn't like Biden or Harris (If people can vote for Biden or Harris just because they hated Trump and not because they liked Harris or Biden, then the opposite holds true as well)

Some voted because they got brainwashed or misguided by propaganda or fell for the narrative.

Some voted because they found themselves aligned with his manifesto (not the execution but the idea itself)

Only a small percentage of people who voted him would actually be fit to call Fascists.



Now, I don't know what you people are reading but I remember reading article on this so will share...

One of the reason why in past decade or so, Left is losing it's clout across the world is they started labelling people in form of generalization even on slightest of difference of opinion which actually ends up alienating many people and push them to the right.

Labelling people became a tool which actually got misused rather than actually serving its true purpose and it not only drifted people away to the right but it's significance got eroded as well.

Like how calling someone a fascist or nazi has become a replacement for "I disagree with/don't like you."