Controversial General Political Discussion

[Blax Blah]

^ because all political systems across the world are based on this.

Society glorifies wealth and power more than serving the society.

And, once people get power and wealth, then it becomes more about "how do I keep or maintain it" which often goes through the path of corruption.

Check this out if you want to

Post automatically merged: Tuesday at 7:35 PM

Corruption is not the problem, the problem is that the system is made so that it is easily used for corrupt purposes, and that the system's goal is to concentrate wealth in the hands of a few, and to increase that wealth, at the cost of the workers' wages and of their living standard

 

[Reborn]

On charlie kirk assassination aftermath..

Kirk was influential in US conservative circles, but not widely known internationally.

After his assassination,

Right: Paid tribute, framed him as a martyr, glorified his role.

Left: Some condemned violence but the rest celebrated and expressed joy which unintentionally end up giving him more limelight.

These reactions on his death went viral and turned him into a symbol beyond his real influence.

Media amplified the outrage, celebrations and tributes.

Polarization made both sides use the event to push their narratives.

Thus, both Left and Right unintentionally elevated Kirk’s stature, making him seem more significant than he was on global stage...

 

[Midnight Delight]

I don't see why any Non American would care about him tbh

It's like a non American caring about "should white people say the N word" debates in America

That's never gonna affect your personal life or your country so who cares

 

[Jew D. Boy]

I don't see why any Non American would care about him tbh

It's like a non American caring about "should white people say the N word" debates in America

That's never gonna affect your personal life or your country so who cares

Hatred knows no borders, it binds stupid assholes together no matter where they live

 

[NikaInParis]

https://theonion.com/desperate-kash-patel-asks-shooters-family-if-they-can-solve-any-other-cases/

Is every single US institution run by clowns? What is this, the Balkans?

 

[Kizaruber Eats]

STOP BEING MEAN TO CHARLIE!

this outrage is performative. Go through human history. Go through the last decade. Then the one before that, before that, before that.

people have cheered when people died. People they knew personally, too, if they had what they felt was a good reason. It doesn’t mean you endorse terrorists or violence. If you don’t think cheering when thatcher died was endorsement of violence, then it’s arbitrary af to say everyone who does it for Kirk is a monster because he happened to die from a murder. Maybe they just feel passionately about child grooming.

if you hold the (reasonable) opinion that Kirk made money off of targeting children and grooming them to the far right and his religious cult, telling young girls at women’s leadership conferences to submit to Christian men immediately on graduation… then it’s reasonable to think the world is better off without that guy. Guess what, I’m still never killing anyone and I’m still pro putting the shooter in prison or whatever they choose to do

also comedy exists and we should be allowed to joke about assassinations lol

 

[Jew D. Boy]

https://www.newsweek.com/kash-patel-jeffrey-epstein-files-update-release-vote-2130678
@NikaInParis You were saying something about a clown show?? Well, the head jester just told a really funny joke!!

 

[NikaInParis]

https://www.newsweek.com/kash-patel-jeffrey-epstein-files-update-release-vote-2130678
@NikaInParis You were saying something about a clown show?? Well, the head jester just told a really funny joke!!

Over/under on how many viking refernces he wanted to include there but was advised not to this time

 

[Ravagerblade]

sure, im aware some of the soundbites are out of context where you actually go and listen to what he is saying, its very different. But, talking about stoning gays and that being gods perfect law for dealing with homosexuals is fucking crazy, and still i dont know what kind of context makes that any less evil. Pointing to him being polite with a gay person at his QnA or being "friends" with a lesbian doesnt help in the slightest to be very honest. . . .

Post automatically merged: Tuesday at 6:26 PM

Ok fair, i didnt mean it like that. But even still, left wingers can criticize other left wingers and vice versa.

If you don't understand the context, Why make a judgment? That's just asinine.

 

[Jew D. Boy]

Over/under on how many viking refernces he wanted to include there but was advised not to this time

Five, and I’ll absolutely take the over

If you don't understand the context, Why make a judgment? That's just asinine.

 

[Zenos7]

If you don't understand the context, Why make a judgment? That's just asinine.

Sometimes, there just isnt any context that makes "stoning gays is gods perfect law" not crazy and evil.

 

[HerreraIsBack]

The righties are always the first to threaten to kick your ass if you’re mean to them tho

The left are the first to shot you for having a different opinion

 

[Ravagerblade]

Sometimes, there just isnt any context that makes "stoning gays is gods perfect law" not crazy and evil.

If your reading an old testament bible, You are literally just quoting it.

Holy shit it's like you don't actually care to try to find out. I shouldn't be surprised by any of you guys, Hivemind indeed.

 

[Jew D. Boy]

https://www.independent.co.uk/tv/ne...irk-video-b2827626.html?utm_source=reddit.com
For someone who’s so fucking fat and thickheaded, he sure has the thinnest skin I’ve ever seen, just a monumental baby snowflake

 

[AL sama]

If your reading an old testament bible, You are literally just quoting it.

Holy shit it's like you don't actually care to try to find out. I shouldn't be surprised by any of you guys, Hivemind indeed.

you mean to say he was quoting the Bible to say something else??

 

[Zenos7]

If your reading an old testament bible, You are literally just quoting it.

Holy shit it's like you don't actually care to try to find out. I shouldn't be surprised by any of you guys, Hivemind indeed.

Nah he added the "gods perfect law when it comes to sexual matters" bit to the quote. so thats his opinion on said quote, not part of it.

"hivemind" is also kind of hilarious, considering my interactions with the other people of the supposed hivemind here.

 

[Ravagerblade]

Nah he added the "gods perfect law when it comes to sexual matters" bit to the quote. so thats his opinion on said quote, not part of it.

"hivemind" is also kind of hilarious, considering my interactions with the other people of the supposed hivemind here.

He continued: “And it says, by the way, Ms. Rachel, might want to crack open that Bible of yours, in a lesser referenced part of the same part of scripture is in Leviticus 18, is that thou shall lay with another man shall be stoned to death. Just saying. So, Ms. Rachel, you quote Leviticus 19, love your neighbor as yourself. The chapter before affirms God’s perfect law when it comes to sexual matters.”

https://www.factcheck.org/2025/09/viral-claims-about-charlie-kirks-words/

At the end of the day he was still Quoting the OT.

 

[AL sama]

If you don't understand the context, Why make a judgment? That's just asinine.

this clip doesn't have whatever context you are referring to

 

[Ravagerblade]

this clip doesn't have whatever context you are referring to

That's not what it was for. I've shown his actual stance, but apparently it's still misconstrued.

 

[Jew D. Boy]

Nah he added the "gods perfect law when it comes to sexual matters" bit to the quote. so thats his opinion on said quote, not part of it.

"hivemind" is also kind of hilarious, considering my interactions with the other people of the supposed hivemind here.

There is nobody more indoctrinated/brainwashed in this thread than this clod (except his Brazilian bootlicking buddy), can’t believe he has the balls to throw out that accusation at anyone else