First. You shared a teacher, I'm still waiting for you to share a scientist.
Second, I didn't disagree with everything he said. Like I said, you would benefit from listening to him a little bit more. But the guy has biases, like most historian centrists leaning on the side of the horseshoe theory.
If you want a scientist, I can give you one. Like I explained, the horseshoe theory is a baseless theory just like it is baseless to explain that nazism is leftism as it's an invizibilization that fascism fought leftism and leftism value. Like I said, go look for Nazism experts. And not those who are explaining that the right and the left are the same things because I won't give them any credits.
Violence is not necessarily unethical or illegitimate.
In the case of antifa. The violence is completely legitimated.
And Antifa are not dead, they are not a group, this is a movement. Antifa means antifascism. As long as you fight fascism, you can be antifa. I, for ex, am Antifa.
THis completely invisibilized how much they actually participated in that massacre.
But you don't care about that. Truth is not something you seek. You prefer to insibilize a genocide.
The point was to show you the importance of context and the fact framing and ethics are two very different things. I don't think you would try to explain how the rebellion is a terrorist organization, right ? ANd yet, they murdered million of people by destroying the death start.
So what does this means? Well for one it doesn't means that the end justify the mean. It means that in this CONTEXT, this was the only solution to stop a genocide.
So when you are framing the hamas as a terrorist organization, you adopt the oppressor's rethoric. Not the ethical one.
Did hamas Went to far and perpetuated a war crime that was absolutely not necessary ? YES.
Did this make them a terrorist organization ? NO
Hamas, just like the french resistance or the rebels in Star wars are a group of resistance. They are not perfect, in fact no resistance group in the world is perfect or pure. The french resistance made war crimes, they did bad stuff, but they were still fighting for their country. Now, does this means that Hamas must go once the country is liberated ? (which will need more than a recognition of Palestine)
Not necessarily. But it's not for us, westerners and outside agent to decide.
Yup, they never cared about freedom of speech. They always had it and we were always silenced.
The "woke are controlling the media" was a self projection
Lmao. Billionaires being leftists ?
I want what you are smokin
Second, I didn't disagree with everything he said. Like I said, you would benefit from listening to him a little bit more. But the guy has biases, like most historian centrists leaning on the side of the horseshoe theory.
If you want a scientist, I can give you one. Like I explained, the horseshoe theory is a baseless theory just like it is baseless to explain that nazism is leftism as it's an invizibilization that fascism fought leftism and leftism value. Like I said, go look for Nazism experts. And not those who are explaining that the right and the left are the same things because I won't give them any credits.
Violence is not necessarily unethical or illegitimate.
In the case of antifa. The violence is completely legitimated.
And Antifa are not dead, they are not a group, this is a movement. Antifa means antifascism. As long as you fight fascism, you can be antifa. I, for ex, am Antifa.
THis completely invisibilized how much they actually participated in that massacre.
But you don't care about that. Truth is not something you seek. You prefer to insibilize a genocide.
The point was to show you the importance of context and the fact framing and ethics are two very different things. I don't think you would try to explain how the rebellion is a terrorist organization, right ? ANd yet, they murdered million of people by destroying the death start.
So what does this means? Well for one it doesn't means that the end justify the mean. It means that in this CONTEXT, this was the only solution to stop a genocide.
So when you are framing the hamas as a terrorist organization, you adopt the oppressor's rethoric. Not the ethical one.
Did hamas Went to far and perpetuated a war crime that was absolutely not necessary ? YES.
Did this make them a terrorist organization ? NO
Hamas, just like the french resistance or the rebels in Star wars are a group of resistance. They are not perfect, in fact no resistance group in the world is perfect or pure. The french resistance made war crimes, they did bad stuff, but they were still fighting for their country. Now, does this means that Hamas must go once the country is liberated ? (which will need more than a recognition of Palestine)
Not necessarily. But it's not for us, westerners and outside agent to decide.
Yup, they never cared about freedom of speech. They always had it and we were always silenced.
The "woke are controlling the media" was a self projection
Lmao. Billionaires being leftists ?
I want what you are smokin
