I just said the opposite. I have ""feminine"" traits and I believe that if you gave me 100+ years i would bridge the gap between gender and probably become non binary (in fact it could very well happen soon). This is my definition of a man, it doesn't have to be the only one, there are thousands of ways to be a man or a woman or both or neither. Like I said, it's a social construct, it's not graved in stone.
dont you usually say gender identity is fixed from birth and people dont actually change it?

with that logic it would mean you are already non-binary without being properly aware of it?
[automerge]1760990365[/automerge]
People can't have dating preferences now??😂
bigots can have dating preferences ;D
[automerge]1760990416[/automerge]
It's funny how you try to twist it. But hey. I can't make you understand something you don't want to understand. Gender are social constructions, felt and given. For women, it's mostly a construction that is imprinted on people with female sexual characteristic, a form of imposition, which is then self justified by later oppression, but it's also more. Again, I can't give you a straight answer. It's complex.
since they are socially constructed, does that mean "woman" means something else depending on what society we are looking at?
[automerge]1760990515[/automerge]
The words we use to describe things are a linguistic issue
ok so you are saying the word is a linguistic issue but what it describes is still a biological reality?
[automerge]1760990678[/automerge]
but what it feels like or what it is to be a man is up to every men
so the word doesnt describe anything really?
[automerge]1760990732[/automerge]
Not surprised of your '''''response'''''🤡
classic logiko. he is the jordan peterson of this thread
 
Last edited:
dont you usually say gender identity is fixed from birth and people dont actually change it?

with that logic it would mean you are already non-binary without being properly aware of it?
No. I usually say that gender identity is non controlable, you can't really decide to be a man or a woman (unless you are genderfluid maybe, but even then, I'm not sure it's a real control, more of a mood change).. But it can still evolve. It's a social construct after all, it's fluid.


with that logic it would mean you are already non-binary without being properly aware of it?
I think you could say that we are all born non binary. Gender construction might come after (even tho gender disphoria would tend to contradict that), it's a bit complex, we still don't know everything yet. That's why there are gender studies and why biologist are interest with the case of trans people.
 
Where ?

I said that "I" was not afraid of what a man could do to me alone
>>
yeah but that was one of the reasons you listed why you are not a woman, so it kind of follows that you are saying that this only applies to women. at best you just didnt phrase yourself properly, at worst you are doing some wiggling around your point again because you have been caught with your pants down.
[automerge]1760991129[/automerge]
Gay conversion therapies are bad but the opposite is good, according to Logiko
turning frogs gay? :Luffy_Pass:
[automerge]1760991212[/automerge]
Seems like there is a lot to unpack here.
i would have thought you are aware of this term, it was huge on the internet a couple years ago and was controversial.
 
since they are socially constructed, does that mean "woman" means something else depending on what society we are looking at?
It could in a very far future yeah, but not in our world I believe. The world is global now, interconnected. Patriarchy is present pretty much everywhere.

so the word doesnt describe anything really?
For the moment, not really yeah. Being a man means different things whether you are asking to a conservative or a leftist man. The most objective thing you can say is that being a man is equivalent to a social status of domination over women in this patriarcal society.

classic logiko. he is the jordan peterson of this thread
lmao


i would have thought you are aware of this term, it was huge on the internet a couple years ago and was controversial.
My leftist politicization is very recent. Less than 5 years. And I mostly followed the french side of politics. I know about people not wanting to date trans people but never this specific term, in french it would sound ridiculous

:shocking:


So basically, C4N continues to show he's brainwashed... Got it.
Nothing ever changes around here.
Remind the room when is the last time that you change your old political vision about something and went the opposite way please ?
:catsure:
 
It could in a very far future yeah, but not in our world I believe. The world is global now, interconnected. Patriarchy is present pretty much everywhere.


For the moment, not really yeah. Being a man means different things whether you are asking to a conservative or a leftist man. The most objective thing you can say is that being a man is equivalent to a social status of domination over women in this patriarcal society.


lmao



My leftist politicization is very recent. Less than 5 years. And I mostly followed the french side of politics. I know about people not wanting to date trans people but never this specific term, in french it would sound ridiculous

:shocking:



Remind the room when is the last time that you change your old political vision about something and went the opposite way please ?
:catsure:
Why would I change to something terrible? Are you dumb?
 
You are wrong though. I hold my own views, and in line with reality, You and C4N do not.
I'm not on the side of making up new shit to fit their selfish worldview and wanting to be something they're clearly not.
So again, you are wrong.
what views of mine dont align with reality exactly?


For the moment, not really yeah. Being a man means different things whether you are asking to a conservative or a leftist man. The most objective thing you can say is that being a man is equivalent to a social status of domination over women in this patriarcal society.
and thats why the majority of people like to use the definition of the term where it actually means something :kayneshrug:
[automerge]1760992690[/automerge]
It could in a very far future yeah, but not in our world I believe. The world is global now, interconnected. Patriarchy is present pretty much everywhere.
but gender roles are vastly different among different cultures, what it means to be a woman socially isnt the same globally
 
"super straight" is a term designated for people who only date cisgendered people.

so me having a preference in regards who i take as partner makes me transphobic and/or racist?

interesting.
"Super Straight" is genuinely hilarious :suresure:


Actually this can be an interesting question. While I don't consider this as an oppressed condition reallyish, the stigma against bald people is definitely the echo of the intersection of different systems of domination: Without too much thinking I would say ableism and patriarchy. Ableism because baldness is associated with handicaps and illness and patriarchy because baldness makes us "less of a man".
There is definitely some ageism in it too. Bald people at 17 (for instance) are considered to be very old.

And when they decide to shave it off because they only have 3 hair on their scalp.... they can get wrongfully harassed for being far-right wing.

I wouldn't say it's patriarchal because they're less of a man but because they won't deal with their emotions and when they share it they can be downplayed.

 
Why would I change to something terrible? Are you dumb?
That's what I thought. You never evolved and questionned your own political vision, values or set of beliefs.

:catsure:


and thats why the majority of people like to use the definition of the term where it actually means something
Why does it rub you so much the wrong way to read scientific concepts ?


There is definitely some ageism in it too. Bald people at 17 (for instance) are considered to be very old.
Indeed!


And when they decide to shave it off because they only have 3 hair on their scalp.... they can get wrongfully harassed for being far-right wing.
Well.. there is an esthetic...
:blobevil:


I wouldn't say it's patriarchal because they're less of a man but because they won't deal with their emotions and when they share it they can be downplayed.
I was more talking about the projection of what it is do be a man understand a very patriarcal lens (mostly non bald). But yeah, there is also this side when Baldness is downplayed. We should indeed promote the acceptation of bald people more. There is a field of awereness that could be reached here.


but gender roles are vastly different among different cultures, what it means to be a woman socially isnt the same globally
Yeah, but the domination of patriarchy is constant, as such, being a woman is a social status before everything else.
 

Jew D. Boy

I Can Go Lower
Why would I change to something terrible? Are you dumb?
Hell, you’re already thoroughly awful as things stand, maybe a new mindset would make you marginally less pathetic?? It’s a stretch, I know, but it’s probably worth a try :BigW:
[automerge]1760997185[/automerge]
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ed-guns-trump-justice-department/86602524007/
*lights up a bong at the shooting range*
COME AND *cough* TAKE IT FROM MY *cough* COLD *cough* *more coughing* DEAD HANDS!!!
 
Hell, you’re already thoroughly awful as things stand, maybe a new mindset would make you marginally less pathetic?? It’s a stretch, I know, but it’s probably worth a try :BigW:
[automerge]1760997185[/automerge]
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ed-guns-trump-justice-department/86602524007/
*lights up a bong at the shooting range*
COME AND *cough* TAKE IT FROM MY *cough* COLD *cough* *more coughing* DEAD HANDS!!!
I want Donnie to come for the gun owners only so that those super right wing gun nuts wake tf up
 
Top