So what if two 6'1 robbers built like a wall of titanium broke into your house and robbed you blind?
Do you have any evidence for this?
can you point to a single society on earth where laws aren’t enforced?
The problem is your short sided vision. You don't understand that when I say "defund the police" I only say "defund the police" when in reality I say a lot more things like "create the conditions for crimes not to exist", "destroy domination systems", "end capitalism". Getting rid of the police alone is stupid. This must be done alongside many other political change in society.
Do you have any evidence for this?
As for the evidences, you will understand that it is hard in a capitalist society where the police and the results of capitalism is everywhere to create the condition to understand if getting rid of the police is viable. It's like saying "water is useless to make things grow, it evaporates when we throw it on the ground (
that is all in fire)". First you can go look
Here you will have a better understanding already.
Asking all the hard-hitting questions here. Soft-on-crime policies would tell the cashier to let the perpetrator take all the cash at hand and then call the police afterward to deal with the issue. However, chances are, if firearms are involved, that cashier isn't walking away with their life intact.
There is nothing "hard hitting" in these question. It's a dumb question taht apoliticized liberal usually make because they don't understand the root cause of these problematics in the first place and thus they don't understand the value of multi-tasking.
Defund the police, means also destroying capitalism, raising social services, creating the material condition for crimes not to happen.
To be honest, any discussion with you is pointless since you always change the goalpost and make assumptions whenever you're wrong.
yea yea sure
You're the one who always saying you are surprised at what I say, always has to assume, and always forget what I said.
Look closer. You miss the important part. You live with unethical contradictions I wouldn't be able to live with. So yeah, I'm surprised. But this only means that
I listen and understand your words, something you do not with mine. And here lie the problem. I always work on my shortcomings, but you seems to think you have all of them figured out. Like many of people here, this makes you blind.
This recent debate has been nothing but you repeating what I said and assuming, cause you always need to find some sort of wrongdoing to cling to and educate someone with your enlightenment(and you yourself admitted to your stubbornness about always wanting to "win")
As explained. I know & even state my shortcomings. I can adjust and even reflect when I'm wrong or pushy (three lines?).
None of you people seems to be able to do this. So it's useless, I can't be the only one to make efforts and reflect. It goes both ways. Sadly.. I've pointed out enough evidence of shortcomings with you. As long as you won't accept self reflection, this will be useless indeed.
Yes I agree with you. We should replace the police with citizen-organized neighborhood watch teams, each of them armed, in fact every citizen should be armed to the teeth so they can defend themselves as well as anyone else in danger. Europe needs a second amendment NOW!
