Are you sure they are leftists?
One of my semi-frequent dinner guests that my wife and I host is a LGBT-Advocate, Pro-Migrant activist. Yet even she has insinuated such things (which you can see in the subtext). Familial restrictions are more of an environmentalist thing from my experience, as people believe the following logic:

We shouldn't be having kids since the planet doesn't have enough resources and we're killing it > We still need some kids > Only those who can 'afford it' should have kids, ergo, the poor shouldn't have children.

It's cancerous.

You are right. It's a bad reflex. I usually use it when political enemies don't try to understand. You are more open than most, I should make more efforts to be nicer as long as we try to understand eachothers. Sorry.
It's always best when we try to work together without insulting the other. When we starting throwing accusations the other side switches off. I've had to work on that over the years.

:blush:
 
Last edited:

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
So, is it the first half of my question?

Regardless, discounting everyone else's input because I am genuinely interested in your point of view, I haven't seen anyone spout neo-nazi stuff except some 'truther' a few years back. Who are you referring to? I assume the pedo comments are referring to Trump supporters since his Epstein ties?

How are you even judging people to be what you accused them of?

Bizarre.
....you're making way too many assumptions here man.

For example, if someone says the age of consent should be dropped to 14, or even 12, tries to explain how it is a good thing and shouldn't be looked down upon, tells a "beautiful story" of a 14 and 34 year old getting together and fucking, all the while calling you stupid for not accepting it...how is calling that pedo promotion and defending an accusation?

If someone says you can't be right wing if you tolerate the existence of homosexuals and immigration, and calls violence against them too soft, defends deadly violence against them, makes constant racist posts, and thinks Trump is a centrist for not doing enough to forcibly rid the undesirables(supporting violence to get rid of people who shouldn't exist or be in a country), a happily self proclaimed far fightist, all textbook elements of a neo nazi, what do you call that? Aren't many right extremism ideologies that perfectly matches this.

I ain't talking about "right wingers" in general. I have plenty of posts explaining and defending right wingers as it varies country to country.
 
....you're making way too many assumptions here man.

For example, if someone says the age of consent should be dropped to 14, or even 12, tries to explain how it is a good thing and shouldn't be looked down upon, tells a "beautiful story" of a 14 and 34 year old getting together and fucking, all the while calling you stupid for not accepting it...how is calling that pedo promotion and defending an accusation?

If someone says you can't be right wing if you tolerate the existence of homosexuals and immigration, and calls violence against them too soft, defends deadly violence against them, makes constant racist posts, and thinks Trump is a centrist for not doing enough to forcibly rid the undesirables(supporting violence to get rid of people who shouldn't exist or be in a country), a happily self proclaimed far fightist, all textbook elements of a neo nazi, what do you call that? Aren't many right extremism ideologies that perfectly matches this.

I ain't talking about "right wingers" in general. I have plenty of posts explaining and defending right wingers as it varies country to country.
Man, who the fuck said the first thing? I'll hunt them before any of the leftists get a chance. :milaugh: Christ, that's grim.

I have never seen posts that actually promote this (at least violence being too soft). You said Logiko was trying to convince these people, which insinuates there are actual posters like this.... so who are you referring to, and why aren't they banned if they're not already?
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
Man, who the fuck said the first thing? I'll hunt them before any of the leftists get a chance. :milaugh: Christ, that's grim.

I have never seen posts that actually promote this (at least violence being too soft). You said Logiko was trying to convince these people, which insinuates there are actual posters like this.... so who are you referring to, and why aren't they banned if they're not already?
They've have been banned before and some of them are perma banned. And lots of these have been removed from public view for obvious reasons, and I don't want to drop names of active people if it ain't necessary(those who know still know). We've had Christian and Hindu nationalists, genocide pushers, white supremacists, people saying women shouldn't get to choose who they get with etc.. More grim than you think cause you ain't around much lol

Point being made to logiko is why waste time with people who hold such extreme views and even blame things like western slavery on the left?
 
They've have been banned before and some of them are perma banned. And lots of these have been removed from public view for obvious reasons, and I don't want to drop names of active people if it ain't necessary(those who know still know). We've had Christian and Hindu nationalists, genocide pushers, white supremacists, people saying women shouldn't get to choose who they get with etc.. More grim than you think cause you ain't around much lol

Point being made to logiko is why waste time with people who hold such extreme views and even blame things like western slavery on the left?
I mean, I remember one Hindu nationalist, and I remember a guy who was a holocaust denier.

But I was concerned as you stated Logiko was still engaging with these extreme people, so I was curious who you were on about. Never mind. Moving on.
 
....you're making way too many assumptions here man.

For example, if someone says the age of consent should be dropped to 14, or even 12, tries to explain how it is a good thing and shouldn't be looked down upon, tells a "beautiful story" of a 14 and 34 year old getting together and fucking, all the while calling you stupid for not accepting it...how is calling that pedo promotion and defending an accusation?

If someone says you can't be right wing if you tolerate the existence of homosexuals and immigration, and calls violence against them too soft, defends deadly violence against them, makes constant racist posts, and thinks Trump is a centrist for not doing enough to forcibly rid the undesirables(supporting violence to get rid of people who shouldn't exist or be in a country), a happily self proclaimed far fightist, all textbook elements of a neo nazi, what do you call that? Aren't many right extremism ideologies that perfectly matches this.

I ain't talking about "right wingers" in general. I have plenty of posts explaining and defending right wingers as it varies country to country.
Age of consent in Brazil is 14. If you called a 30 year old that was banging a 14 year old the P word, you would get sued and lose. I know this is bullshit, but it is what it is. Some people just have different perspectives on who is and isn't a PDF.

Nazis defend Aryan race supremacy. I know who you are talking about. I never saw that user, which is currently banned, do that in here. You're throwing wild accusations with no grounds now. Ultranationalism would be a better term here. Neo-Nazi isn't it.
 
Man, who the fuck said the first thing? I'll hunt them before any of the leftists get a chance. :milaugh: Christ, that's grim.

I have never seen posts that actually promote this (at least violence being too soft). You said Logiko was trying to convince these people, which insinuates there are actual posters like this.... so who are you referring to, and why aren't they banned if they're not already?
I'll just say this we delete a lot of stuff
 
Which is still a fucked up thing to say,
Hm... no?
I would actually be ashamed of voting for Trump if I knew what he did, who he is and what he plans. The guys is a fascist bro.

I don't play with fascist or their defenser. We are not in a friendly debate here. You don't understand it, but your politic side ruin lives, kills people, send marginalized into invisibilization. And yes, anyone voting for Trump should be ashamed. Especially now. Especially when they have kids who are growing to be in danger (not potential, but actually factual danger) by their votes.

People are being kept in horrible conditions if not worse in concentration camps in the US right now. (and in France too btw).


Zemmi voted what she believed was best for her kids
Yes, and people voted for Hitler for what they believed in.
What's your point ?


Needing one to start a family is basically turning everyone into cattle. Are we in Sparta?
I told you, I was on the road of straight up fascism.

Yet even she has insinuated such things (which you can see in the subtext)
.. ok :/ . Well this is a very dangerous subtext rethoric. Especially for leftists. There might be a dangerous paradox in the making here.


We shouldn't be having kids since the planet doesn't have enough resources and we're killing it > We still need some kids > Only those who can 'afford it' should have kids, ergo, the poor shouldn't have children.

It's cancerous.
Indeed, this belief system is the direct path toward fascism as a form of domination at the intersection between class domination and eugenism. Marxists tend to argue that overpopulation is in direct corrolation with accumulation tendancies linked to capitalism. Basically trying to reduce population under capitalism can only lead to a form of class / racial / ableist / sexist selection that will eventually lead up toward a form of genocide.

Technically, there are FAR MORE than enough ressources on the planet for all of us and much more. The problem is overproduction. We are taking much more than we need and not in an equal repartition (the north global takes, the south global starves as a result)


It's always best when we try to work together without insulting the other. When we starting throwing accusations the other side switches off. I've had to work on that over the years.
Yes, but you would do the same in my position. I've been hitting the same wall for 5 years and hardly giving up. And I know that we need to find a replicable way to break it. Not just for me, but all of us. This place is the perfect space to experiments these methods, but it's getting frustrating. Although I'm always willing to soften up if needed.


I have never seen posts that actually promote this (at least violence being too soft). You said Logiko was trying to convince these people, which insinuates there are actual posters like this.... so who are you referring to, and why aren't they banned if they're not already?
I believe the one Van is talking about I did not try to convince too much. I think I lost my patience against them very quickly.

But yeah, even these guys I can't prevent myself from trying to convince (this is an actual bad thing that I shouldn't do, the risk of spreading their rethorics is high but this space is quite closed off so I'm chosing to take these risks).
 
, genocide pushers,
Never said or implied any of that. Said communists need to be dealt with the way the Poles treat them. Meaning jail those that promote it. And give either a life sentence or capital punishment for those that have actually committed atrocities (human rights violations).
Nicolae Ceaușescu is an example of what I meant. It is completely fair to ban ideologies that preach against human rights (like private property).

I'll just say this we delete a lot of stuff
You didn't delete any of this, and yet, when I voiced the same thoughts while talking to Eamon, my take was taken out of context, and I was banned for supposedly calling for masses of innocent people to be killed (aka genocide). You are a shit moderator.
But of course,hunting the sheep would be genocide. I'm simply saying do it like Poland:ban this shit,take anyone that has any affiliation with former communist party from any job in the public machine and ban them for life from politics. What of guerrila fighter and terrorist that will pop up?Kill them. Democracy was never about left x right.
Intelectually dishonest? i'm literally putting down my cards on the table. You are the one that is hiding your sympathy for communism. One day you say that communism is alright,the other day you talk about nordic model and socialism.
As i said before,what needs to happen in Latin America is a social cleanse. Starting with the top of the ladder: politicans that have affiliation with said parties?banned. Those that are corrupt and criminals? Judged and punished according with their crimes. Thing is,lots of these guys commit crimes against humanity with their policies,so they should face life sentence or the noose.
[automerge]1707180374[/automerge]

They are useful idiots like Stalin liked to call them. They are being used. They are stupid.
[automerge]1707180436[/automerge]

"We will achieve communism by progressivly taxing capitalism"-Marx. Colombia is a bureocratic hell just like Brazil and the rest of Latrin America. I have never been in Russia either,what of it? Good for you and you daddy.I wish prosperity to all of you,but the thing is:most people will not thrive under a severely regulated economy.
https://econamericas.com/2018/09/latin-america-fails-economic-freedom/
"Jail and kill all Nazis". "Hey,he is talking about killing all Germans" No,wrong,Fallacious logic.
You know pretty damn well who i think should get a bullet,its men like: Lula,Fat Kim,Putin,Xi Jiping and intelectuals,rich guys and other high status people that are associated with all the crimes against humanity under communism regimes. The average german citizen in Nazi Germany was not a fucking SS soldier or even a nazi for that matter. I'm not talking about going after common people just because they believe stupid shit. The likes of you,solis and c4n would not be harmed under such cleanse.
[automerge]1707183818[/automerge]

Calls my comparison fallacious and completely ignorant. Next says communism was never applied. Classic,C4N. No,i'm not advocating for the deaths of idiots like you. Just the ones that are actually criminals(the ones that used the public machine to do crimes against humanity and take away freedom from citizens). Oh you are going to be mad at me?FUCK YOU AND ALL THAT YOU STAND FOR,YOU CLOWN.GET A FUCKING JOB.NOBODY READS THIS SHIT.YOU ARE NOT DOING JACK SHIT WIT YOUR LIFE.
So, am I getting perma banned for having said that dictators that commit crimes against humanity deserve the bullets that are inevitably shot their way two years ago? In Bangladesh, they executed a prime minister long ago for crimes against humanity. Both your nations apply the death penalty. Fuck WorstGen moderation. Y'all full of shit. I got banned from a thread for bumping it yesterday. You people are hella immature for middle-aged men. Grow the fuck up, y'all.
 
14 years strong, my guy. I had multiple girls interested at the time, but I never permitted anything beyond flirting until I decided 'yes, I'm willing to be with this person with the intent to marry'. Once I realised my wife was that kind of person, I committed and never looked back.
Goals bro

I'm considered a very attractive guy, got approached a lot, young adult right now


I come from a non-practicing christian family, but when I looked into it myself, decided to be one full on



So far just rejected them and I started going to church recently and meeting believers like myself, lots of amazing people so far and barely started



I'm hoping God blesses me with an awesome girlfriend too that wants to follow him
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
Never said or implied any of that. Said communists need to be dealt with the way the Poles treat them. Meaning jail those that promote it. And give either a life sentence or capital punishment for those that have actually committed atrocities (human rights violations).
Nicolae Ceaușescu is an example of what I meant. It is completely fair to ban ideologies that preach against human rights (like private property).


You didn't delete any of this, and yet, when I voiced the same thoughts while talking to Eamon, my take was taken out of context, and I was banned for supposedly calling for masses of innocent people to be killed (aka genocide). You are a shit moderator.




So, am I getting perma banned for having said that dictators that commit crimes against humanity deserve the bullets that are inevitably shot their way two years ago? In Bangladesh, they executed a prime minister long ago for crimes against humanity. Both your nations apply the death penalty. Fuck WorstGen moderation. Y'all full of shit. I got banned from a thread for bumping it yesterday. You people are hella immature for middle-aged men. Grow the fuck up, y'all.
You say all of this when I wasn't even talking about you lmao. I was talking about Palestine and anti-Muslim rhetoric, and I know fuck all about your stance on that.
 
Goals bro

I'm considered a very attractive guy, got approached a lot, young adult right now


I come from a non-practicing christian family, but when I looked into it myself, decided to be one full on



So far just rejected them and I started going to church recently and meeting believers like myself, lots of amazing people so far and barely started



I'm hoping God blesses me with an awesome girlfriend too that wants to follow him
Also quite a crazy time with it, sort of witnessed to others through it

I got bullied for a year by one girl for rejecting her in the past

But at the end of highschool she said she wished there were more guys like me
 
It is completely fair to ban ideologies that preach against human rights (like private property).
Private property (not the one you think, but the one communist is fighting) is in itself ethically fundamentally against human rights bro. Please, refrain from talking about human right when you defend things that goes against human rights.

If I had one advice to you. Is to bring to yourself a drop of humility. Never have I seen you actually listen to the arguments of leftist, you are simply replying through your own lens at everypoint, without adressing points most of the time.

I debunked your thinking process so many times through every types of means (scientific papers, sociological text, logical reasonning, materialist thinking, personnal experience...). You only seem to care about what YOU think and analyze reality through YOUR lens and no others. You think you are the only one to suffer, but reality is so much bigger than your world mate.

People ask me to reflect, but damnnnnn they should look themselves into the mirror. They have no lesson to give.

Can't you see your confirmation biases??




Also quite a crazy time with it, sort of witnessed to others through it

I got bullied for a year by one girl for rejecting her in the past

But at the end of highschool she said she wished there were more guys like me
Sorry about that. You will find someone exceptional I'm sure
 
Goals bro

I'm considered a very attractive guy, got approached a lot, young adult right now

I come from a non-practicing christian family, but when I looked into it myself, decided to be one full on

So far just rejected them and I started going to church recently and meeting believers like myself, lots of amazing people so far and barely started

I'm hoping God blesses me with an awesome girlfriend too that wants to follow him
Do it right, by both god and the woman you choose, and things will be well. Good luck, brother.
 
Top