General & Others Next Strawhat Crew Members and the Grand Fleet

[Logiko]

Yamato’s past - daughter of Kaido, inspired by Oden, held captive with other samurai, learned about the outside world, beaten for 20 years, formed a bond with Ace and learned about Luffy, betrayed her father to help bring him down

Carrot’s past - heard Pedro talk about Roger once, got some cute little gloves

Post automatically merged: Nov 19, 2021

It’s all right there, pal…but careful, your lacking comprehensive skills are showing again.

Edgy boy. You should know that there are lines you don't cross.

Post automatically merged: Nov 19, 2021

So than was Franky decoy? You wanted Paulie instead
Was Brook decoy ? You wanted perona
Was ussop decoy? You want kaya
Was Jimbei decoy? You want Hancock
Was zoro decoy? You want coby
Was nami decoy? You want chew chew or the mayor?
Was sanji decoy? You want johnny and yosuke
Was chopper decoy? You want dalton
Was Robin decoy? You want pell
Ha ha ha ha this is funny

There has only been two decoy in this serie: Vivi and Yamato.

 

[Sir Yasheen]

Has carrot been relevant at all lately… to think these carrot for Nakama cultists would get the hint

 

[Logiko]

Has carrot been relevant at all lately… to think these carrot for Nakama cultists would get the hint

Cultist ? We are pushed by logic, pushed argumentations and reason, Yamato fans are pushed by hype and emotion.

We are not the cultist here.

 

[Finalbeta]

Has carrot been relevant at all lately…

Smoothie level of panel time at least.

 

[Staticshadic]

Has carrot been relevant at all lately… to think these carrot for Nakama cultists would get the hint

They can’t cope with it because there hanging on for deer life

 

[Jew D. Boy]

Edgy boy. You should know that there are lines you don't cross.

Post automatically merged: Nov 19, 2021

There has only been two decoy in this serie: Vivi and Yamato.

On the Internet?? You and dizzy aren’t even smart enough to see the writing on the wall here, something tells me y’all aren’t capable of following up on an empty virtual threat 🙄

Also, that first “decoy” you mentioned is canonically a former Straw Hat…y’all can’t even make a coherent point without inadvertently arguing FOR Yamato 🤣

 

[Logiko]

On the Internet?? You and dizzy aren’t even smart enough to see the writing on the wall here, something tells me y’all aren’t capable of following up on an empty virtual threat 🙄

Also, that first “decoy” you mentioned is canonically a former Straw Hat…y’all can’t even make a coherent point without inadvertently arguing FOR Yamato 🤣

Still, edgy boy, Vivi was a narrative decoy. I know your brain sometime fail to understand basic storytelling on major scale, but i'm sure this narrative trick was simple enough for you to grasp a hint.

 

[Jew D. Boy]

Still, edgy boy, Vivi was a narrative decoy. I know your brain sometime fail to understand basic storytelling on major scale, but i'm sure this narrative trick was simple enough for you to grasp a hint.

I’d ask you to explain what the hell “narrative decoy” means when we have genuine confirmation of her status as a nakama, since your beautiful mind understands this Japanese comic better than the author who writes it, but again, I doubt it’ll make MORE sense with your gibberish

Post automatically merged: Nov 19, 2021

And yeah, I *AM* edgy, took long enough for someone to notice!!

 

[Raughtale]

''You see, by making Carrot completely irrelevant and shit fans will be surprised and happy when she joins, no we are not cultists''

 

[Logiko]

I’d ask you to explain what the hell “narrative decoy” means when we have genuine confirmation of her status as a nakama, since your beautiful mind understands this Japanese comic better than the author who writes it, but again, I doubt it’ll make MORE sense with your gibberish

Post automatically merged: Nov 19, 2021

And yeah, I *AM* edgy, took long enough for someone to notice!!

A former strawhat is exactly that. Former.

 

[Jew D. Boy]

A former strawhat is exactly that. Former.

Better to be a has-been than a never-was, although I’m absolutely certain you’d disagree

 

[thedarkdragon11]

There has only been two decoy in this serie: Vivi and Yamato.

This one's a prime example of having a poor adult reading comprehension in a teen-targeted manga...

 

[Logiko]

Better to be a has-been than a never-was, although I’m absolutely certain you’d disagree

Vivi is still a nakama in my heart. She is just not an active crewmate. Robin is.

Post automatically merged: Nov 19, 2021

This one's a prime example of having a poor adult reading comprehension in a teen-targeted manga...

Oh boi

 

[Jew D. Boy]

Vivi is still a nakama in my heart. She is just not an active crewmate. Robin is.

For Christ’s sake, you JUST said “A former Strawhat is exactly that. Former.” and NOW you’re saying she’s still a nakama?!?! Neither you nor I are high enough to be talking this much bullshit, I’m honestly at a loss…

 

[Logiko]

For Christ’s sake, you JUST said “A former Strawhat is exactly that. Former.” and NOW you’re saying she’s still a nakama?!?! Neither you nor I are high enough to be talking this much bullshit, I’m honestly at a loss…

That's because you don't read correctly

 

[Jew D. Boy]

That's because you don't read correctly

Or you do a thoroughly horrible job of explaining yourself in a way humans might understand, one of the two

 

[Logiko]

Or you do a thoroughly horrible job of explaining yourself in a way humans might understand, one of the two

I'm very specific when I talk. You are just to generic when you try to understand.

 

[Sigran101]

I'm very specific when I talk. You are just to generic when you try to understand.

You're not specific at all when you talk. You barely ever explain yourself! It's always "the characterization is different" without explaining how, or "that's a bad faith argument" without explaining why. If there's one thing you're not, it's specific.

 

[Outlaw]

You're not specific at all when you talk. You barely ever explain yourself! It's always "the characterization is different" without explaining how, or "that's a bad faith argument" without explaining why. If there's one thing you're not, it's specific.

Your talking to a poster who along with another making bad faith arguments saying backstories are not needed along with saying they understand the story better than everyone.

@Van is spinning in his metaphorical grave

 

[Logiko]

You're not specific at all when you talk. You barely ever explain yourself! It's always "the characterization is different" without explaining how, or "that's a bad faith argument" without explaining why. If there's one thing you're not, it's specific.

I can give you that. I don't try to explain my concepts, because I think that you wouldn't listen most of the time. So.. it's the same anyway for me. The principle of an injonction is that I don't need to explain.

When someone say something and the story proves it wrong, I'm not the one who need to explain why it's wrong, the other person needs to convince me that they are right. That's the magic of the burden of proof.