Nope, it's different. I threw a vote on you to hopefully follow something with momentum and get something rolling. I also thought your exchange with Ratchet didn't feel super townie. So I voted and hoped maybe there'd be some reactions or movement. You make a random, untethered, comment about me being a wolf, based on some lame meta, and now you've reversed it when I called you out. That's some weak shit right there, Ultra, and I think you're a bit soft this game. You look like someone who is trying to pick soft battles with players you know you can argue with, but don't want to dip your toes too deeply in because you're afraid to drown. That makes me feel like a wolf trying to look proactive and tried to get town read, but is too afraid to stick their neck out all the way in case the axe swings down.
"Follow some momentum" "Get something rolling"
You do this shit and wonder why I don't really give you the benefit of the doubt - you will put me under heat for the sake of it. Meanwhile I'm actually making a case on Ekko and getting a wagon going. Stupid shit, if you don't have a reason, stop throwing your vote around. Pretty basic.
Now as for the rest of this post, I have 0 clue what the fuck you're on about. I'm "picking soft battles" with Ratchet and Ekko - I think it's pretty fucking fair to say that if that's who I choose to engage with I have 0 issue engaging with anyone in this thread. Wack garbage.
Now, you softed Ekko as scum, but have pivoted entirely to wolf reading me for being his main pusher, and discounting me as doing nothing. How does that work, X?
What did I literally just say? I said I didn't like how you jumped in the middle of Ratchet vs Prof. I didn't see you as townie over that interaction. So no, it's not just putting you under heat for the sake of it. And wow, you're going after Ekko? What a bold and risky move! You going after Ekko, someone I consider a pretty safe place for you to argue, only strengthens then point I made about you going after safe arguments so you can look pro town.
Is it wack garbage? Is it not a fair thing to say that you're probably the most comfortable and familiar with Ratchet here? You start an argument with him as your first real toe tipping exercise, an argument you started because you wanted to defend Prof. Ratchet then gets post restricted, so then that gets dropped. You make a floating comment about me being wolf, and try to attach meta to it, only to 180 and call me town when I call you out. Now you're apparently making a case against Ekko, which is very uninspiring to me. You can see why I think your play might be soft this game.
Don't act ignorant, we for sure have two wolf teams because that's always how these games work. Besides, if someone is suss, you go after them and figure out team equity later. I have a soft wolf read on Ekko right now, but you saying 'I'm going after someone you wolf read so how could I be a wolf' seems like a pretty bland excuse and one that doesn't track with me. That's a bad faith argument, my man.