The problem in this thread is that each of you guys are only use high end feats for your faves and use low end feats for the opposition.
Like right now you are saying you didn't know Luffy had greater armament than Oden.
Somebody will counter attack asking you if Apoo who blocked Zoro's attack has better armament than Oden himself.
At the end of the day,I think Zoro has better Coa but saying things like "Oden level haki" isn't helping us right now as controlling Enma isn't indicative of having same level of armament as Oden(at age 39),at least until he cuts Kaido.
But then again that's arguing future events in the present.
I want to see both of them using Coa in the same way(body to defend or sword for both) and then we can compare them directly.
Like right now you are saying you didn't know Luffy had greater armament than Oden.
Somebody will counter attack asking you if Apoo who blocked Zoro's attack has better armament than Oden himself.
At the end of the day,I think Zoro has better Coa but saying things like "Oden level haki" isn't helping us right now as controlling Enma isn't indicative of having same level of armament as Oden(at age 39),at least until he cuts Kaido.
But then again that's arguing future events in the present.
I want to see both of them using Coa in the same way(body to defend or sword for both) and then we can compare them directly.
Also the fact that Zoro says he would get stronger from getting used to sword suggest that COA is at least a contributing factor.
And when it comes to getting haki broken, Luffy's has had several low end feats in that respect. His top end feat in that has to be against Cracker. However, Cracker's feats in COA cannot be quantified. He sure as hell won't be able to wield Enma either.
The final one deals with Kinemon and co using Oden level haki