Then why did Big Mom point out the sword? If it had literally nothing to do with Enma then why would the sword itself have been notable? Why didn’t she say swordsman if it was strictly due to what Zoro could do regardless solely from his emotions?
Kaido specifically mentioned the sword’s haki. Unless Kaido has such a memory for detail that he remembered the exact cut of Enma’s blade, how could he have felt anything different about Enma than Wado when they are the same grade? Or are you saying that Kaido does know the distinct cut and feel of Enma 20 years later just by the steel itself? It was Zoro’s haki but the effect Enma had on Zoro’s haki mirrored Oden because Enma would have had a similar effect on Oden’s haki.
While you are absolutely correct on the need to master a sword before unlocking its full potential, we have seen concrete evidence that different swords can provide more raw power before they have been mastered.
Just because Zoro hadn’t mastered it doesn’t change that it provided a boost in raw power. It just meant that it was also coming with some negative side effects until he fully got it under control. It actually mirrors Enma’s first big use exactly by creating an attack more powerful than Zoro could have provided without it, yet missing.
Are you saying that Zoro cannot use ACoA without Enma? Because I don’t believe that to be true at all. Zoro’s other swords still appear to be able to cut Kaido and even Killer appears to have cut Kaido without using a sonic attack.
Kaido said well done after and didn’t single Zoro out. Which he should have if Killer didn’t manage to cut him at all.
Kaido specifically mentioned the sword’s haki. Unless Kaido has such a memory for detail that he remembered the exact cut of Enma’s blade, how could he have felt anything different about Enma than Wado when they are the same grade? Or are you saying that Kaido does know the distinct cut and feel of Enma 20 years later just by the steel itself? It was Zoro’s haki but the effect Enma had on Zoro’s haki mirrored Oden because Enma would have had a similar effect on Oden’s haki.
While you are absolutely correct on the need to master a sword before unlocking its full potential, we have seen concrete evidence that different swords can provide more raw power before they have been mastered.
Just because Zoro hadn’t mastered it doesn’t change that it provided a boost in raw power. It just meant that it was also coming with some negative side effects until he fully got it under control. It actually mirrors Enma’s first big use exactly by creating an attack more powerful than Zoro could have provided without it, yet missing.
Are you saying that Zoro cannot use ACoA without Enma? Because I don’t believe that to be true at all. Zoro’s other swords still appear to be able to cut Kaido and even Killer appears to have cut Kaido without using a sonic attack.
Kaido said well done after and didn’t single Zoro out. Which he should have if Killer didn’t manage to cut him at all.
Lmao
many contradictions
They pick and chose
