[FNZ] Salem of Lies Round 5 : Town of Salem

[Reborn]

@Flower btw, how come you have info on two users?

Can you explain your actions to avoid any confusion?

 

[Finalbeta]

problem isn't that you fake claimed to see reaction, I think the problem here is you trying to defend your fake claim before admitting it.

That's part of fake claiming, trying to make it sound real.

Then after you get some reactions, you can reveal your true intentions.

 

[Finalbeta]

@Flower btw, how come you have info on two users?

Can you explain your actions to avoid any confusion?

She simply can't. It's not part of the game mechanics.

 

[Poison Chan]

Well she can't have two results at the same time. This is certain.

yeah, but what i had contradicts facts so, for now I'm gonna put the both of you in sus list

 

[Flower]

@Flower btw, how come you have info on two users?

Can you explain your actions to avoid any confusion?

Won't reveal it yet. Wait until Homelander has replied.

 

[Finalbeta]

Slips are slips. It’s not a matter of “oh look at me with my 10 years of experience in mafia! I can’t make a single mistake!”

I will take slips for what they are. If you can’t defend your action and have to jump to using your experience and berate me for being a novice player, this only shows that you are running out of arguments and have to resolve to something not even related to the current game’s events.

No I can very well fakeclaim to find reaction because I know that I'm the Lookout lol.

It's a very legitimate mafia practice, that's why I called out your inexperience.

 

[Kiwipom]

yeah, but what i had contradicts facts so, for now I'm gonna put the both of you in sus list

Did you have something against flower?

 

[Reborn]

That's part of fake claiming, trying to make it sound real.

Then after you get some reactions, you can reveal your true intentions.

Thats BS.

You fake claimed. Defended it...then after rej called it, you called for LO with argument that you wanted to see reactions.

You made many slips Final while flower hasn't made a single slip.

 

[Poison Chan]

Did you have something against flower?

yes. now it's prolly my first ToS considering how i dropped the two-three others, so I can't really boldly say stuff atm. but i do have something against flower and which NOW totally took Beta in it too

 

[Dark Admiral]

isn't someone going to claim any more?

 

[Finalbeta]

Thats BS.

You fake claimed. Defended it...then after rej called it, you called for LO with argument that you wanted to see reactions.

You made many slips Final while flower hasn't made a single slip.

I wanted to see what the initial reactions were to find something useful, it's not that you have to keep your fakeplay for hours.

That's rare and uncommon.

I know how this stuff works lol.

 

[Dragomir]

what were your initial doubt against Final, before his slip-off..??

that's a pretty bold claim for someone so inactive. Are you just following orders..??

I am using my ToS knowledge to make that claim. Voyeur is not a role within town of salem, thus he is lying, thus he is scum and everything he said after that is pure wholehearted bullshit. It should be ignored for us to focus on other players.

Beta is scum. Jailor should jail and execute him.

 

[Flower]

yes. now it's prolly my first ToS considering how i dropped the two-three others, so I can't really boldly say stuff atm. but i do have something against flower and which NOW totally took Beta in it too

Oh, please elaborate on this. This phase is gonna get good.

 

[Dragomir]

yes. now it's prolly my first ToS considering how i dropped the two-three others, so I can't really boldly say stuff atm. but i do have something against flower and which NOW totally took Beta in it too

Do reveal for us please.

 

[Finalbeta]

Just as expected.

Drago not looking any good. Still stuck with that "Voyeur is not part of ToS" thing lmao.

My move wasn't so bad after all.

 

[Celestia]

It seems flower isn't the only one with info. Even you have something.. right?

well it is obvious she used a night action that why she asking them and from what I am familiar with the roles I know what might be her role and what she doing

I was just playing around and see what arguments you guys could pull over my BS.

Also no one has counterclaimed me so far.

I'm the Lookout, if you guys don't believe me then lynch me.

It's a very common practice to find for players' reactions.

Hmm if we believe u are the LO what was your actions ? How come u claim without actions ??

 

[Dark Admiral]

Just as expected.

Drago not looking any good. Still stuck with that "Voyeur is not part of ToS" thing lmao.

My move wasn't so bad after all.

ok, summarize all the facts you gained after your suicidal claim.

 

[Kiwipom]

@Finalbeta

> My role is Voyeur with a capital V (so it is the name of the

Voyeur is one of these

> What no, I’m not a lookout. I’m a variation of lookout!

variation of the Lookout role

> Hold up a minute, there is no Voyeur in ToS. I guess I’ll say I’m a lookout

I'm a Lookout yes.

So what are you? Voyeur or Lookout?

 

[Poison Chan]

Oh we can claim like that?

 

[Dragomir]

Oh we can claim like that?

Yes.