I’m sorry my friend, but your “debunking” missed the goal posts worse than Scotty Norwood in Superbowl 25.
One Piece has baffling and idiotic story developments at times. Simply, this isn’t one of them.
Normally, little’s gained from debating particulars, when guiding universal rules are in conflict. Arriving at consensus, even partial, from conflicting axioms is impossible. I’d rather discuss rubric of analysis, before debating a particular character/event. Which is beyond the scope of this forum, and my energy. I declined participating in my friend’s Royal Rumble event for the same reason. If I address every issue I have with this, it’ll be unfair to him so I’ll try to keep it as short as possible. Hope he’s not miffed at me lol
- The premise of your argument seems to confusingly oscillate from “A fictitious pirate should adhere to my moral code” to “Regardless of moral code, this character’s actions are internally contradictory” without rhyme or reason. Also the “MUHHH Prophecy” and "Dying Woman's Rambling" is bizarre. One Piece is a fantastical world. The Will of D is real. Whitebeard, who’s not a cynical One Piece reader, should follow Joy Boy’s absolute prophecy. His dream’s been accomplished. He had a family. One of said family was destined, in his errant belief, to become Joy Boy. That was worth dying for in his final days. As that was the only way Oden’s dream could become true as well. Oden refused Roger’s help for a reason. WB ended the old era to set the stage for Joy Boy’s arrival. A singular thematic thread stringed every scene in 999 togther. Whitebeard, among everyone else related to Wano, are waiting for Joy Boy. “Good” characters in One Piece do “stupid” things. “Luffy freed legendary villains from Impel Down who wreaked havoc” “Dumb Bellemere died and caused her daughters’ suffering. She could’ve just denied they were family “Sanji is so stupid, he’d let his crew die over kicking a woman” “Oden is so gullible believing Orochi” Yes they’re all stupid. Those are their beliefs and flaws and they’d die for them. They’re not morally virtuous characters, and we shouldn’t expect them to be. Oda said he’ll never have Luffy preach Justice as he’d be a hypocritical pirate. Now that’s the main character! Imagine WB!
- Other posters (Boggy, Van, Bounty, etc) here posted on difference between Thatch, Ace and Oden’s situations, exaggerated rumors, etc... Most of what they mentioned is bang on and better than I could put it. Anyone could just as easily say, years after Oden’s death why would he believe any Kozuki has been left unharmed? FI was his declared territory, Wano wasn't. Protecting your Yonko territory against weaklings, isn’t a white knight avenger war against a Yonko (Mind you, unlike MF, Joy Boy wasn't in danger). You bring up his scene with Squard as a show of inconsistency, then say avenging Oden is worth sacrificing his “fodder army”. If you’re asking for consistency based on Squard’s scene, you can’t ask for him to butcher his family in a "moral" war. Whitebeard doesn't see them as fodder, if that's what you're claiming. You claim inconsistency. It’s simply context.
Lastly, I’ve studied philosophy at one of North America’s top universities, and you’d be shocked to know actual professional moral philosopher musings on this question. The "differences" they see would floor you lol
You're spot on on #4 though. Whitebeard definitely cares for Oden, and in an ideal world things might be different.