@Zoro D Goat is a candiboys 
Character Discussion So Sanji making out with Pudding is considered a pedophile but Vander Decken making out with Shirahoshi is not?!?!?!
- Thread starter Warchief Sanji D Goat
- Start date
- Tags #judge's son #sanjididnothingwrong #two weirdos
Why is pedophilia one of the most discussed subjects on the forum?
I'd take lame petty Zoro vs Sanji shit over this.
Nothing good comes from this thread being open
I'd take lame petty Zoro vs Sanji shit over this.
Nothing good comes from this thread being open
This site is for enjoying a manga-anime centered to a public of all kinds and these kinds of talks pushed so casually not only constitute high off topic but they are just inappropriate for the audience.
I honestly hate this discussion so much. This is a shonen manga. It isn't realistic, we aren't supposed to think about it too much.
But even if we do go there.
Honestly, I wish the mods would just ban this topic
On a similar note, in regards to the whole pervert gags thing(ex. sanji using invisibility to peep), I think there is this thing in japanese culture where this type of humor is found to be funny. Personally I find it a bit distasteful(especially with like Gauche from Black clover), but if you are going to criticize this, I feel like you should criticize the trope itself(which is found across shonen) and not just use it to say Zoro good sanji bad.
But even if we do go there.
- Sanji was forced against his will to marry pudding and only decided to go along with it when he realized that resisting in any way would hurt his friends or family
- Pudding was the one who kissed Sanji
Honestly, I wish the mods would just ban this topic
Post automatically merged:
On a similar note, in regards to the whole pervert gags thing(ex. sanji using invisibility to peep), I think there is this thing in japanese culture where this type of humor is found to be funny. Personally I find it a bit distasteful(especially with like Gauche from Black clover), but if you are going to criticize this, I feel like you should criticize the trope itself(which is found across shonen) and not just use it to say Zoro good sanji bad.
Last edited:
When I was in school with 16/17y was pretty common for the girls from my class to date guys with 19/20/21y. Its strange, but kind of common, and isnt like he fucked Pudding, they just kissed.
Some guys are obsessed with this gag of Sanji being a perv, like this isnt a common think in all Shonen manga, its seems to be a thing of japanese culture that we cant understand that well.
Some guys are obsessed with this gag of Sanji being a perv, like this isnt a common think in all Shonen manga, its seems to be a thing of japanese culture that we cant understand that well.
?
Lmao, if some of y'all get triggered this much then can't wait for my other upcoming thread
At least my conviction in this thread was right.
See what I mean?
Compliment ≠ Feel anything towards that person.
When have I ever defend Decken?
I literally put it there in my post Lmao.
Come on Owl, at least reread my post carefully.
I never said Hancock hitting on Luffy is fine.
Dunno. I mean it's not like somebody didn't make this meme in the first place.......
At least my conviction in this thread was right.
Sanji in the same category as Vander Decken confirmed.
Soo nice of you to compare both of them.
Soo nice of you to compare both of them.
Do you seriously believe that Sanji felt nothing for Pudding?
When have I ever defend Decken?
@Zoro D Goat bruh, this thread is one big straw man because nobody has ever defended Vander Decken.
The reason nobody talks about Decken is due to folk either forgetting about him or folk wanting to forget about him. He is simply that bad a character. Remove him from the series and nothing worthwhile is lost.
Besides, a better character for your argument would be the 30 year old cougar that is permanently wet from her constant hungering for teenage dick.
The reason nobody talks about Decken is due to folk either forgetting about him or folk wanting to forget about him. He is simply that bad a character. Remove him from the series and nothing worthwhile is lost.
Besides, a better character for your argument would be the 30 year old cougar that is permanently wet from her constant hungering for teenage dick.
Come on Owl, at least reread my post carefully.
I never said Hancock hitting on Luffy is fine.Dunno. I mean it's not like somebody didn't make this meme in the first place.......
So I was just rereading Fishman Island arc and I noticed some contradiction upon the OP fanbase.
Vander wants Shirahoshi to be his wife, and during the flashback, she was like what? 6 years old? Man even sent a love letter to her.
And dude even try to kill her mother just to achieve his goal. And in Fishman Island, dude is still throwing axes at her just for her to accept his proposal. If this is not creepy then I don't know what it is.
Prior to Sanji
He met Pudding for the first time and his first reaction is heart eyes just like how he act towards any woman.
Both of them got arranged marriage and Pudding are agree to engaged. And both loves each others.
The problem is, Sanji doesn't act the same towards Pudding as he does to Nami or to other woman.
Now does that means that Sanji doesn't love Pudding? No. It's just mean that Sanji felt normal towards Pudding just like any other girls but act different towards Nami and etc.
So what's the point of this thread you may ask?
Well, the answer is, since people are complaining about Sanji being a "pedo", "creeps" etc. I decided to make a thread to justify his analogy between Pudding and Nami and other matured woman plus the comparison of Vander's action towards Shirahoshi. Sanji doesn't act lovey dovey towards Pudding unlike with Nami and others.
Examples:
As you can see, Sanji doesn't immediately have heart eyes towards Pudding. Well, there's definitely some scenes.
But that's just a few scenes. Most of the time, Sanji act normal towards Pudding.
Conclusion: When Sanji acting "normal" towards supposedly underage girl like Pudding, people be acting like some white knights and be flaming on Sanji's repulsive behavior despite they don't have any girls look at them in real life while guys like Vander Decken trying to hit on Shirahoshi while she was 6 years old can get away with such "unreasonable bias" because One Piece fandom hates Sanji. Why am I even surprised? Hancock hitting on Luffy pre-timeskip is normal, Ace hitting on Tama is normal, Sanji acting friendly towards Pudding is bad?!?!?
Man, talk about not getting enough paycheck.
That's all from your boss Goat. Oh and this is for the other day.
Vander wants Shirahoshi to be his wife, and during the flashback, she was like what? 6 years old? Man even sent a love letter to her.
And dude even try to kill her mother just to achieve his goal. And in Fishman Island, dude is still throwing axes at her just for her to accept his proposal. If this is not creepy then I don't know what it is.
Prior to Sanji
He met Pudding for the first time and his first reaction is heart eyes just like how he act towards any woman.
Both of them got arranged marriage and Pudding are agree to engaged. And both loves each others.
The problem is, Sanji doesn't act the same towards Pudding as he does to Nami or to other woman.
Now does that means that Sanji doesn't love Pudding? No. It's just mean that Sanji felt normal towards Pudding just like any other girls but act different towards Nami and etc.
So what's the point of this thread you may ask?
Well, the answer is, since people are complaining about Sanji being a "pedo", "creeps" etc. I decided to make a thread to justify his analogy between Pudding and Nami and other matured woman plus the comparison of Vander's action towards Shirahoshi. Sanji doesn't act lovey dovey towards Pudding unlike with Nami and others.
Examples:
As you can see, Sanji doesn't immediately have heart eyes towards Pudding. Well, there's definitely some scenes.
But that's just a few scenes. Most of the time, Sanji act normal towards Pudding.
Conclusion: When Sanji acting "normal" towards supposedly underage girl like Pudding, people be acting like some white knights and be flaming on Sanji's repulsive behavior despite they don't have any girls look at them in real life while guys like Vander Decken trying to hit on Shirahoshi while she was 6 years old can get away with such "unreasonable bias" because One Piece fandom hates Sanji. Why am I even surprised? Hancock hitting on Luffy pre-timeskip is normal, Ace hitting on Tama is normal, Sanji acting friendly towards Pudding is bad?!?!?
Man, talk about not getting enough paycheck.
That's all from your boss Goat. Oh and this is for the other day.
I literally put it there in my post Lmao.
Come on Owl, at least reread my post carefully. I never said Hancock hitting on Luffy is fine.
Come on Owl, at least reread my post carefully.
I never said Hancock hitting on Luffy is fine.
Yeah, you mentioned her in a single sentence. That is the point.
Instead of using the example Hancock x Luffy, which is actually a pretty common pairing with a large age gap because shippers ship shit ships, you instead use Vander feckin Decken, a character who has exactly zero fans and is at best treated by the fandom with disinterested apathy or at worst, complete disgust.
In order to defend Sanji from claims of supposed pedophilia, you used for an example the one character in One Piece that actually is a pedophile?
That is like claiming somebody is a good person because they are not as bad as Hitler. Lel.
This topic in general is dumb but your best bet for this line of argument to work would have been targeting Hancock x Luffy since the age gap in that pairing is over twice as much compared to Sanji x Pudding and still involves a character who would be a legal minor in many countries.
Notice that I said "best bet" and not "a good bet" because ultimately the folk who claim that Sanji is a pedophile come from a fan base that cares little for pairings/shipping in general, let alone any specific ship. Thus trying to pin this supposed hypocrisy on them is just flat out not going to work.
No offense ZD but your entire argument is just helplessly batting at strawmen of your own creation.