One is a main character the other is an irrelevant villain that everyone agrees is a pedo but since he is irrelevant people dont talk about him.
What is so hard to understand about this?
Pretty sure someone can find more of him being a creep.
And also I already said you don't have to go to extreme cases for being a creep and as I said why would nami send zoro to keep her body safe from sanji? IDK why you are trying to defend a creep's action.
Even the movie staff made him a super creep. Especially when its under oda's watch. The main thing to get with this fact is how he is perceived by the creators i.e. a creep.
Ussop and Brook seem to be ecstatic and have been waiting for that moment.. pretty sure that counts as a creep.
I mean whats the point.. Sanji likes to gawk at beautiful women and likes Boobs like some of yall do while watching hentai which with all due respect sanji limits it to gags .... and you have the ballz calling him a creep... if you are that willing to label people for their behavioral attributes then why not call out chopper's naiveness , Robin's PTSDs for buster calls , pessimism in dire situations and sadism for squeezing Franky's testicles, Ussop's inferiority-complex and negative hopelessness, luffy for being the 1st Retard sailing the seas as a captain and being an inconsiderate piece of shit sometimes, and zoro for being a masochistic drunken, sword wanking, anti-bearings riddled LOST CAUSE
see, how i can use their attributes make them sound like thier drawbacks when that's what defines them and their character when they are at their best and thier tropes and flaws which they set aside when things go south.
Sanji is a pervert true.. but so is oda.. why not hate on him as well.. be consistent at least
Sanji was with Pudding for most of the time and the most he did was gawk over how beautiful she looks .. and the rest half of luffy retrieval aspect of WCI.. he wasn't even concerned about any pervy crap..
You all make it sound like sanji's pervertedness had led to someone's demise...when he limits his perviness with his chivalry and we see that time and time again and now with black Maria.. Pudding, nami herself and Robin too
No one calls brook a flipin dead skeleton out for calling out a supposedly underage mermaid to show her panties.. its all taken as a gag..so why be hypocrites.. why not be consistent and really condemn every pervert in onepiece and even Oda himself.. and just stop reading the story that doesn't require double face retards to read it anyway..
its just your contempt against sanji...admit it.. even if you don't..atleast stop assuming that people will fall for this stupid ass twisted biased jargon
Age of consent is 14 in Germany (Germa) and 13 in Japan.
I think both are too young, personally. 16 is the cutoff in the UK and that is where I live, but then again a sizable percentage of underage people have sex here so even that law is a bit moot anyway.
The majority of states in America have an age of Marriage of 16 or less, and the age of consent in 45 out of the states have 16 or under as age of consent, with restrictions based on age difference for about a third of those, restrictions based on parental consent for the other third and no restrictions for the other third. So even if you have the American mindset, Sanji has followed that, with the exception of California (ironically puritan for the bizarre hyper sexualised society they have there) and a few other states.
JFC, Pudding is not underage. Maybe in the U.S, but 16 and 21 is fine in the UK and like 80% of the world. Especially when a) the parents are the one pushing you to marry at threat of literal death.
Post automatically merged:
And what is with this Sanji Derangement Sydnrome. Man lives in your head rent free. Zoro won't fuck you guys no matter how many posts you write.
One is a main character the other us an irrelevant villain that everyone agrees is a pedo but since he is irrelevant people dont talk about him.
What is so hard to understand about this?
Donβt know if anyone mentioned this and I donβt care to check, but Goatβs trying to say that if one of the two is an inappropriate sleazebag, then they both are, which a) duh, obviously, and b) one is MEANT to be portrayed as a villain and a sexual predatorβ¦and the other one is Vander Decken πππ
Donβt know if anyone mentioned this and I donβt care to check, but Goatβs trying to say that if one of the two is an inappropriate sleazebag, then they both are, which a) duh, obviously, and b) one is MEANT to be portrayed as a villain and a sexual predatorβ¦and the other one is Vander Decken πππ
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.