Did I say that she was not in your post at all? Also, where did I claim that you did say it was fine? Lol.
Yeah, you mentioned her in a single sentence. That is the point.
Instead of using the example Hancock x Luffy, which is actually a pretty common pairing with a large age gap because shippers ship shit ships, you instead use Vander feckin Decken, a character who has exactly zero fans and is at best treated by the fandom with disinterested apathy or at worst, complete disgust.
In order to defend Sanji from claims of supposed pedophilia, you used for an example the one character in One Piece that actually is a pedophile?
That is like claiming somebody is a good person because they are not as bad as Hitler. Lel.
This topic in general is dumb but your best bet for this line of argument to work would have been targeting Hancock x Luffy since the age gap in that pairing is over twice as much compared to Sanji x Pudding and still involves a character who would be a legal minor in many countries.
Notice that I said "best bet" and not "a good bet" because ultimately the folk who claim that Sanji is a pedophile come from a fan base that cares little for pairings/shipping in general, let alone any specific ship. Thus trying to pin this supposed hypocrisy on them is just flat out not going to work.
No offense ZD but your entire argument is just helplessly batting at strawmen of your own creation.
