You can just off a King if you think they‘re evil and replace them with somebody you trust. For example, somebody is confirmed Blue Dragon and the King has made some questionable choices you want the confirmed player having all that King powers. But usually you don‘t do that unless you have reasons to doubt the King.
[FNZ] Salem of Lies Throne of lies: The battle for the Throne
- Thread starter Fujishiro
- Start date
- Tags #yelan for king do not kekko tag or i will yeet u into the sun dragomir the otaku husbando sisters alliance hypocritical kekko kekko and migraine kekko back at spamming sheit run kekko the dog kekko you are a curse kekko you make my head hurt kekkoillogix kekkolitis ulcerosis kekkos autism is otherworldly kekkos mom should have taken the pill real kekko here retire kekko
- Status
He is all over the place - switching between reads, not calculative, sometimes making very sensible post like saying "hime action getting failed doesn't implicate LM" and other times he refused to listen to the reason.
Looks confused.
His defence of Nana and not questioning her at all is what pinged me the most as king can be evil and having doubt on king is quite obvious in ToL.
But from his play he looks more of a confused town to me
Ya there could be. Host can have two such roles
...............
.............
Looks confused.
His defence of Nana and not questioning her at all is what pinged me the most as king can be evil and having doubt on king is quite obvious in ToL.
But from his play he looks more of a confused town to me
Ya there could be. Host can have two such roles
............................
Given that you have received the feedback that your action failed, we can rule out a protective action.
Shooting him would be suboptimal, given both his activity and the lack of prior stated scum read over him from you.
Investigating him might make some sense, but if that were the case I'd expect more suspicion from you today.
Given that he was the only target, we can rule out roles that target two players.
So none of the early theories I can come up with look particularly good here.
Shooting him would be suboptimal, given both his activity and the lack of prior stated scum read over him from you.
Investigating him might make some sense, but if that were the case I'd expect more suspicion from you today.
Given that he was the only target, we can rule out roles that target two players.
So none of the early theories I can come up with look particularly good here.
I was the one to start an interaction with Pero. How can I piggyback off of someone there when it was me that kickstarted it? So this point is false. I was also the one to go in depth with Rottkins, in which I have managed to get him to explain himself. Pero reacted worse to the pressure, like I've previously mentioned, so I opted for him.
When it comes to Hime, I dropped my questioning of her, due to the mistake I made, which I also stated. I believed she had answered before Ekko had posted, and my questioning relied on the fact that Ekko had not posted.
When it comes to Hime, I dropped my questioning of her, due to the mistake I made, which I also stated. I believed she had answered before Ekko had posted, and my questioning relied on the fact that Ekko had not posted.
- Status