I compared zoro and kid both not blocking an attack and them clearly having 2 different reactions to prove that kid is tankier. I used that to say that if zoro was put in the same circumstances as kid agaisnt shanks meaning not blocking he would have gotten koed too this is a fact i am not sure how you can disagtee on that. using zoro blocking hakai is impressive but irrelevant to the debate. And I said zoro and law would not be able to ring out ot much less defeat big mom because zoro in koh would not last long enough hence why i said it would be a downgrade. How am I being biased when I am using what the narrative clearly suggest? Why do zoro fans always get defensive when someone doesn't praise zoro?
And if he uses KoH, he surely can use it as much as Law and Kidd could with their awakening. You act like they didn't get KO'ed and could use their PU undefinitely.