General & Others When does a weapon become a sword and a man a swordsman?

Shanks has never been confirmed to be a swordsman so the argument is daft


  1. We don’t actually know how xebec is doing what he’s doing with his swordsmanship. We do know it looks different from divine departure but that isn’t the point
  2. Nothing in the story even halfway implies mihawk having even comparable haki to shanks let alone better

Haki is used for everything

No same way big mom is a physical monster, has internal armament, conquerors infusion, and sword attacks doesn’t make her a good swordsman as we’ve seen. Her not even being considered a swordsman
Shanksnisnt a swordsman but he’s Mihawks rival his sword skills was talked about in Mihawks bounty reveal and since a kid he fought with a sword . Are you autistic ?
 
Shanksnisnt a swordsman but he’s Mihawks rival his sword skills was talked about in Mihawks bounty reveal and since a kid he fought with a sword . Are you autistic ?
Bigmom , xebec , shanks , rocks , rayleigh , roger , fujitora , shiryu

theyre all swordsman
haki is essential for every swordsman
armament haki for better sword durability
observation for evasion and precog
and Conquerors haki for more AP

swordsmanship have varieties as well
even without df powers
some swordsmanship styles can produce fire like Kinemon
and others can produce twisters like Zoro

and swordsman can also combine their DF ability with their swordsmanship
like Law with Ope Ope DF
fuji with Gravity
shiryu with invisibility

this is not rocket science lol
this is simple
 
Oda has called Shanks a swordsman in multiple official One Piece sources.

I know haki is used for everything but when used with swordsmanship it's part of swordsmanship. It's like footwork. A lot of fighting styles use footwork. When used with boxing it becomes part of boxing skills.

Swordsmanship refers to the skills and techniques used in combat and training with any type of sword.

I'm still on the fence whether BM is a swordsman or not. A swordsman is anyone who fighting style centers around swordsmanship or they are at their strongest when using a sword.
Not in the manga

Haki can be a part of swordsmanship but it doesn’t have to. That applies to all fighting styles

Swordsmanship is just using a sword no matter how good or bad someone can actually use it. Characters like king, queen, big mom, kizaru, are constantly using swords but it doesn’t make them an actual swordsman
Shanksnisnt a swordsman but he’s Mihawks rival his sword skills was talked about in Mihawks bounty reveal and since a kid he fought with a sword . Are you autistic ?
A sword duel is different then a normal battle
 
Not in the manga

Haki can be a part of swordsmanship but it doesn’t have to. That applies to all fighting styles

Swordsmanship is just using a sword no matter how good or bad someone can actually use it. Characters like king, queen, big mom, kizaru, are constantly using swords but it doesn’t make them an actual swordsman

A sword duel is different then a normal battle
Shanks is only going to fight with his sword and haki just like Zoro Mihawk Roger ray xebec you’re fighting a losing battle . There’s 20 years of manga proof saying he’s a swordsman wtf are you even arguing
 
You’re just saying things now

I’m saying Brook has never shown he has a “style” and Oda hasnt even given him one in Vivre cards

again, I’m not going to believe you just because. It’s not in the manga so that’s that
You never believe anything i say.. lol

Ok then no big deal, i'm speculating that Brook's Sword Style is Humming Sword Style.. :kayneshrug:
 
Good that you clarify it’s speculation

so your statement that “swordsman must have sword styles” is also speculation since it’s built of speculative evidence
Yes.. But if a Sword Skill doesn't make a Swordsman, what does?.. A Sword Style fits perfectly and is the only option available to determine what truly delimit what a Swordsman is..
 
Yes.. But if a Sword Skill doesn't make a Swordsman, what does?.. A Sword Style fits perfectly and is the only option available to determine what truly delimit what a Swordsman is..
Sword skill is not the same as “sword style”

Sword skill is basically anything anyone does with a sword. This includes The Vivre card directly saying Zoro’s KoH is a sword skill, so Zoro’s CoC abilities are counted as Zoro’s sword skills

And yes that means Xebec’s “shockwaves” and Shanks’ Kamusari and Brook’s Music, freezing, and fencing abilities are all sword skills. Yes Brook directly says his music attacks are his “Swordmanship”. This also means Kin’emon and Zoro’s fire abilities are also sword skills. As in producing fire from thin air is a sword skill.

And of course Zoro’s Ashura which makes no sense and has never been explained anywhere in the manga and no other character including top tiers has anything even slightly similar to it. This is also a sword skill
 
Sword skill is not the same as “sword style”

Sword skill is basically anything anyone does with a sword. This includes The Vivre card directly saying Zoro’s KoH is a sword skill, so Zoro’s CoC abilities are counted as Zoro’s sword skills

And yes that means Xebec’s “shockwaves” and Shanks’ Kamusari and Brook’s Music, freezing, and fencing abilities are all sword skills. Yes Brook directly says his music attacks are his “Swordmanship”. This also means Kin’emon and Zoro’s fire abilities are also sword skills. As in producing fire from thin air is a sword skill.

And of course Zoro’s Ashura which makes no sense and has never been explained anywhere in the manga and no other character including top tiers has anything even slightly similar to it. This is also a sword skill
Soul solid
Fox Fire style
Zoro's tatsumaki , Ashura , Pound Cannon

All 3 are sword skill
 
Shanks might have stronger haki, but he still loses the fight
If you look closely since the return of the timeskip Oda has establish that to win a fight a swordsman have to have a stronger Haki than his oppenent.
Zoro who is overall stronger than Pica could not have beat him if his Haki was weaker.
And other pint of your haki is weaker than your opponent, your weapon get cut (i.e Zoro vs Hyozou, Zoro vs Apoo, Zoro vs Kamazo, Zoro vs King)

If a swordsman does not have a stronger Haki than his opppent he cannot hurt him and thus he cannot defeat him.
 
If you look closely since the return of the timeskip Oda has establish that to win a fight a swordsman have to have a stronger Haki than his oppenent.
Zoro who is overall stronger than Pica could not have beat him if his Haki was weaker.
And other pint of your haki is weaker than your opponent, your weapon get cut (i.e Zoro vs Hyozou, Zoro vs Apoo, Zoro vs Kamazo, Zoro vs King)

If a swordsman does not have a stronger Haki than his opppent he cannot hurt him and thus he cannot defeat him.
I disagree. Why would a battle between swordsman be so much different to battles in general, where characters with weaker haki perfectly have the ability to damage and even defeat their opponents?
 
I disagree. Why would a battle between swordsman be so much different to battles in general, where characters with weaker haki perfectly have the ability to damage and even defeat their opponents?
Ask Oda.
Pica was certain that he could beat Zoro if he has a better Haki and Zoro agreed with him on this idea.
I think that Oda introduced the concept of « a nik on the blade is a swordsman’s shame » to use a swordsman having his sword broken as a cue to his total defeat. Thing is that all the competent swordsmen put Haki on their sword which means that if you are not able to bypass your opponent Haki, you cannot cut their sword and thus you cannot defeat them.
Broke the sword of a swordsman is breaking his spirit. Which is probably why Oda had recently introduced the idea of « the beloved sword of » (thing that did not exist preskip).
For example you can say that Kinemon’s spirit was broken when Kaido destroy both of his blades.

This concept was also expanded with Shusui because the people of Wano thought that it is because Shusui was stolen that the island was suffering is current fate, as if losing the sword defeat the will of the samurais. The belief is so ingrained in them that Hiory gave away her heirloom to get it.
We can furthermore talk about the fact that in Wano every samurai has a sword made for him at his birth and his buried with it. Stealing one of this sword is seen as something blasphemous.
Reinforcing the idea that the sword is link to the swordsman on a spiritual/soul level.
Therefore the swordsman as to do everything to protect their sword which is why every swordsman in Wano knows how to flow haki from the body to the blade.

In this line of thought we can think that making a black blade is the testament of an unbreakable spirit/will forged in countless life threatening fights.
One step forward, and the conclusion is that Mihawk spirit/will is stronger than Shanks.

Obviously I can be totally wrong about all that but if making a black blade is link to spirit/will in any shape or form, it would seems obvious to me that the logical conclusion is that Mihawk as a stronger Haki than Shanks.
 
Obviously I can be totally wrong about all that but if making a black blade is link to spirit/will in any shape or form, it would seems obvious to me that the logical conclusion is that Mihawk as a stronger Haki than Shanks.
Big if.

Im sticking to what i said after witnessing bellamy damage luffy despite having weaker haki and luffy winning against boa sisters,cracker, katakuri, kaido with inferior haki.

There is also 3 types of haki involved anyway. Among many other stats that factor in
 
Top