Character Discussion Why do you think ZBoys are in such denial about Green Bull having a black blade?
- Thread starter DarkWitch
- Start date
Greenbull roflstomped him so much that Alber is still shown alive and not a mummified husk btw, unlike what MANY people on here theorized he would be after their supposed black blade user was done with him.
Mind you, King is still kicking despite already missing a wing and beign on deaths door when Greenbull rolled up on him and Queen.
But I understand, you have to take what you can get as an Admiral fans these days, especially as a Greenbull fan after his twerk session and being unable to "roflstomp" Morley.
"B-But Celestial Dragons!!!" if Greenbull cant beat fucking Morley without worrying about collateral that guy is getting his shitrocked by a fresh Alber high to extreme diff, fire proof wood or not, and I stand by that.
Mind you, King is still kicking despite already missing a wing and beign on deaths door when Greenbull rolled up on him and Queen.
But I understand, you have to take what you can get as an Admiral fans these days, especially as a Greenbull fan after his twerk session and being unable to "roflstomp" Morley.
"B-But Celestial Dragons!!!" if Greenbull cant beat fucking Morley without worrying about collateral that guy is getting his shitrocked by a fresh Alber high to extreme diff, fire proof wood or not, and I stand by that.
Take it up with Oda, it’s not my problem.
As I already said, even something as simple as Zoro looking like Ryuma wasn’t mentioned until towards the end of Wano. Kinemon spent 4 arcs with the Strawhats, around 250 chapters before it was brought up.
Don’t be surprised if Oda doesn’t confirm anything until the very end of Greenbull’s fight in the Final War.
That’s a pathetic excuse and you know it. What bigger problem did he have when they were having the after arc party?
Why didn’t Kinemon notice it? Or Denjiro? Or Kiku? Or any other Wano resident who spent days with Zoro…2 weeks before the Raid even?
The only clownery here is ignoring such things for the sake of a silly agenda.
As I already said, even something as simple as Zoro looking like Ryuma wasn’t mentioned until towards the end of Wano. Kinemon spent 4 arcs with the Strawhats, around 250 chapters before it was brought up.
Don’t be surprised if Oda doesn’t confirm anything until the very end of Greenbull’s fight in the Final War.
Post automatically merged:
That’s a pathetic excuse and you know it. What bigger problem did he have when they were having the after arc party?
Why didn’t Kinemon notice it? Or Denjiro? Or Kiku? Or any other Wano resident who spent days with Zoro…2 weeks before the Raid even?
The only clownery here is ignoring such things for the sake of a silly agenda.
Probably because the likelihood would be around 0.000001 %.
In 900 years we only know of two Sword Gods - Ryuma & Mihawk. So unless someone forged a black blade say 450 years ago and it somehow came in to Green Bulls possession it’s extremely unlikely.
We have 0 indication that GB is better than Fujitora, Rayleigh, Shanks, Roger, Shiki, Venus or Oden with his sword and managed to do what they could not.
In 900 years we only know of two Sword Gods - Ryuma & Mihawk. So unless someone forged a black blade say 450 years ago and it somehow came in to Green Bulls possession it’s extremely unlikely.
We have 0 indication that GB is better than Fujitora, Rayleigh, Shanks, Roger, Shiki, Venus or Oden with his sword and managed to do what they could not.
So if I answer your post, are you going to refuse to read it and just label me a Zoro-tard. Or do you actually want to know why it's deniable?
The main point as to why, is because the Vivre Card explicity chose the scene where Greenbull was coating his tendrils in haki, this could also mean that he was coating his blade in haki as well. Being a logia, there is no reason why he couldn't do this from his hip, when he can morph is body in all sorts of ways and apply haki to it.
The vivre card itself, maybe as a design choice, chose to not show Greenbull applying haki to the tendrils in that image, but chose to show him potentially coating the blade, and thus making a temporary black blade.
This is why despite it showing GB's blade as black, it still doesn't mean it is a black blade like shusui is. It would be like me saying "oh so Greenbull actually wasn't coating the tendrils he made with this devil fruit in haki, because the vivrecard doesn't show it." :
Do you understand now why this line of logic is faulty?
I personally don't mind even if he has one. It would make the story more interesting, it could mean someone else, maybe back in the void century also made a black blade. When the world of one piece is so vast and has a deep history, it would make sense that atleast 3 individuals in it's entirety forged one.
The main point as to why, is because the Vivre Card explicity chose the scene where Greenbull was coating his tendrils in haki, this could also mean that he was coating his blade in haki as well. Being a logia, there is no reason why he couldn't do this from his hip, when he can morph is body in all sorts of ways and apply haki to it.
The vivre card itself, maybe as a design choice, chose to not show Greenbull applying haki to the tendrils in that image, but chose to show him potentially coating the blade, and thus making a temporary black blade.
This is why despite it showing GB's blade as black, it still doesn't mean it is a black blade like shusui is. It would be like me saying "oh so Greenbull actually wasn't coating the tendrils he made with this devil fruit in haki, because the vivrecard doesn't show it." :
Do you understand now why this line of logic is faulty?
I personally don't mind even if he has one. It would make the story more interesting, it could mean someone else, maybe back in the void century also made a black blade. When the world of one piece is so vast and has a deep history, it would make sense that atleast 3 individuals in it's entirety forged one.
