Your most controversial opnions which majority dont support /belive/justify

[Uncle Van]

When i was younger my grandma monitored me pile woods for winter heating. It is a really tough job to do in fall but nonetheless i managed and i pilled them all like a great wall of China they looked. My grandma said i did a bad job and that i should re do it

When i said no she said i am an ungrateful prick

*makes full course breakfast*
*tells you to do it over cause her taste buds changed*

Sounds like the textbook example of a narcissist. Lol

Lmao that's exactly what we call her. She didn't like it of course

 

[Adam 🍎]

*makes full course breakfast*
*tells you to do it over cause her taste buds changed*

Indeed. To my grandma is the type of person that said Germans in WW2 were handsome and gentlemen while Italians were crazy and scumbag

 

[Uncle Van]

Indeed. To my grandma is the type of person that said Germans in WW2 were handsome and gentlemen while Italians were crazy and scumbag

I have many questions...

 

[Adam 🍎]

I have many questions...

Non in my family have blonde hair, we checked

 

[jinri]

Religion is the worst thing that happened to humanity, good thing I left the shithole known as South Asia to join a civilized country

"From France"

:risicheck:

 

[Formerly Seth]

You should fuck off about your fucking sexuality and making urself look like a victim. We are in 2021 everyone fucks with who he wants. We don't fucking need to hear your bed stories. We really don't care that dude fucks another dude in the ass. Just stop fucking talking about it. Forcing acceptance on someone only drives people towards more hatred. It makes you look like desperate psychos who want people to acknowledge that dude can drill other dude's ass.

Get some fucking life and get off Twitter and stop looking up to Americans and start to care about ur own life. You will leave more peacefully.

 

[Adam 🍎]

You should fuck off about your fucking sexuality and making urself look like a victim. We are in 2021 everyone fucks with who he wants. We don't fucking need to hear your bed stories. We really don't care that dude fucks another dude in the ass. Just stop fucking talking about it. Forcing acceptance on someone only drives people towards more hatred. It makes you look like desperate psychos who want people to acknowledge that dude can drill other dude's ass.

Get some fucking life and get off Twitter and stop looking up to Americans and start to care about ur own life. You will leave more peacefully.

I'm yet to hear someone brag about fucking someone in the ass

 

[Formerly Seth]

I'm yet to hear someone brag about fucking someone in the ass

I wish you won't have to go thru this. I had few encounters with what's the word, extremist? LGBT extremist. LGBT movement is for money. But actual people who believe that they need to push LGBT acceptance are retarded as fuck.

 

[Luffy is the mc]

I'm yet to hear someone brag about fucking someone in the ass

I think he's talking about people who identify themselves based on their sexual orientation or gender or sex or whatever they use nowadays.

 

[Cross_Marian]

I think fighting for human rights and sharing your opinion is important but I hate the "internet prophets". Twitter is the best example for it.
The PC babies from South Park are the perfect example.

 

[Adam 🍎]

I think he's talking about people who identify themselves based on their sexual orientation or gender or sex or whatever they use nowadays.

Ah that. Yea fuck those people

I was once told i am not real LGBT bcs i am bisexual and not pure gay. Was pretty funny

 

[Formerly Seth]

I think fighting for human rights and sharing your opinion is important

It is of course. But I think we pretty much passed the phase of people hating gay and black and everything u can think of from these kinds of things. Of course, they are racists or people who won't accept LGBT. You will never get rid of people.

Fam in your country, in my country. There are probably different gender people fucking each other behind the scenes and they rule the country at the same time.

The problem is when you try to force acceptance on people. Stuff like that creates more hatred. Normally I don't give a fuck but If I have to listen to some retard talking 24/7 about why "Gay are the same as heterosexual people" I just want to fucking leave or punch that bitch in the face so he stops talking.
[automerge]1629916396[/automerge]

Ah that. Yea fuck those people

I was once told i am not real LGBT bcs i am bisexual and not pure gay. Was pretty funny

Lol see.

This is what I'm talking about.

I don't give a fuck about who you identify with but some people take this as opportunity to take the conversation into unhealthy levels trying to make you look like a hater or shit.

 

[Fuckthis3]

I'm yet to hear someone brag about fucking someone in the ass

So you never heard sex talk? That cool stay a pure Virgin don't need to be tainted

 

[Cross_Marian]

Tolerance isn’t acceptance.
Everyone should tolerate each other but nobody can force acceptance to someone else. That’s annoying. Everyone has a different opinion.

 

[Formerly Seth]

Tolerance isn’t acceptance.
Everyone should tolerate each other but nobody can force acceptance to someone else. That’s annoying. Everyone has a different opinion.

/close.

 

[Adam 🍎]

So you never heard sex talk? That cool stay a pure Virgin don't need to be tainted

Amongst friends yeah, it is normal. And even then it has boundries

 

[Ballel]

I think fighting for human rights and sharing your opinion is important but I hate the "internet prophets". Twitter is the best example for it.
The PC babies from South Park are the perfect example.

:cheers:
[automerge]1629917238[/automerge]

Ah that. Yea fuck those people

I was once told i am not real LGBT bcs i am bisexual and not pure gay. Was pretty funny

There are also those kinds of LGBT'extremists' who say that they are better people bc they are LGBT, and that they don't like straight people.
Some really have a weird form of herd mentality and want to be 'SpEciAl'.
At the same time, they don't accept asexual people as LGBT and say stuff such as 'try it, you might enjoy it'.

Guess what, identity and orientation are not things that you choose.
Extremists of both kinds are bad and toxic.

 

[Zenos7]

There is no objectively good/bad if God does not exist, simply because of a simple reason

If there is no God, there is no absolute law

Meaning, the law will be subjective

Why is killing ants punish you nothing while killing humans punish you a death sentence?
There is literally no difference between the two if God does not exist

Why is eating animals moral (for non vegans), but why is eating humans immoral?
There is literally no difference between the two if God does not exist

For objective reason so that society could survive? then, i have to make it more specific

What if there is a region, where they impose a law such that

IF a person eat meats more than their daily needs of meat per day, they would be sentenced to death since they excessively kill animal for no substantial reason

can you call that objectively good? can you call that objectively bad? please elaborate

And whats your basis for law/good/bad/morality/ethics not being subjective? Thats like, your bias because you are religious. And also, which god? Because the absolute law changes drastically on which religion you adhere to. And considering the sheer number of religions to choose from and the complete lack of evidence for either of them, i am still inclined to not take this argument seriously without evidence for any god or even multiple ones.

Also not sure if you noticed, but laws/morals are vastly different anyway depending on location, and even within one location people have very varying views about this.

But spoiler alert: We are social animals. Its much easier to live in a society than on your own in the wild. Such a society works much better with laws than without.

Also, maybe the moral landscape from sam harris would be interesting to you, in which he argues that science can determine moral values. Dont ask me about what his points are though, i didnt read it yet.
[automerge]1629927453[/automerge]

refute my argument then lol, prove if there is objectively good/bad if there is no god

prove the following
1) there is obejctive good/bad, period
2) there is a god/ or gods
3) the objective good comes from the aforementioned god/gods

you are just shifting the burden of proof onto other people that dont accept your extraordinary claims that you present without extraordinary evidence (and have never been presented with extraordinary evidence).

 

[jinri]

Also, maybe the moral landscape from sam harris would be interesting to you

It's only interesting if you're interested in reading hundreds of years of debate regarding objective/subjectice morality be ignored in favor of "science has solved morality" and just handwaving away any relevant points of contention.

 

[Zenos7]

It's only interesting if you're interested in reading hundreds of years of debate regarding objective/subjectice morality be ignored in favor of "science has solved morality" and just handwaving away any relevant points of contention.

Well why would a book fixating on science determining moral values care about hundreds of years of philosophical debate? philosophy and science are different, you know.

Not to defend the book, as i mentioned i didnt read it yet. But sam harris seems to generally be a very smart dude