[FNZ] Role Madness [Season2] Round 15: Big Three Mafia Game
- Thread starter TheAncientCenturion
- Start date
- Tags #destalija #larimo dynamight more like dummymight flowa<3 fuji nerfed im litteraly at post 49 dont ask me stuff dummies rej top-right town scumsopp tac is not a ztard tac should retire the big 3 prs these gif prs are killing me plz help townflowa zuji still top 1 ship tho
- Status
Alright, I do want to talk about someone else that hasn't been receiving a ton of attention and that is Nat.
One thing I didn't really like about Nat's early posts is how she seemed to be happy with how Enryu replied in post 244. Maybe this could be an chance to buddy up to someone who is pretty new, it seems.
Post 387 and 396 Nat talks about how Luffy isn't guaranteed to be a good role. Now, that seems to be the truth, but at the time she said it, it could have been something to strike up paranoia. Looking back at that comment now, kind of weird that she was right so early.
Post 427 once again is cool with Enryu over very little I think.
Post 473 is kind of pingy as well, because I just hosted a game where Ali was indie, an he was pretty excited. Albeit scum and indie are different, feels like a stretch of potential meta to paint Ali in a bad light.
There's quite a few posts where Nat really focuses on Adam and him dropping his PR. Now, I know that was hella suss of Adam, but I've explained my thoughts on him already and think he's probably an Exe hunting for Luffy and has TMI on it. I feel like Nat's focus on Adam here was a safe place for her to look like she was contributing when she really wasn't.
I think with Nat's focus on Adam, and here quick call out of the WU being fake in post 773, there stands a decent chance it was Nat who tried to frame Adam. With Nat doubling down quickly after and voting Adam in post 781, it doesn't sit well with me. Really seemed like the smear job was by Nat.
The smear feels bad as well when you consider that after all of this suss on Adam, in post 828, Nat says she'd be fine with a Fuji vote as well despite no conversation about him.
Triples down on Adam in post 857 saying to just vote him out. This seems like she's convinced despite offering up Fuji's head thirty posts ago.
Overall, there's enough in Nat's game that I don't like and I think she deserves a look at and some pressure next day.
One thing I didn't really like about Nat's early posts is how she seemed to be happy with how Enryu replied in post 244. Maybe this could be an chance to buddy up to someone who is pretty new, it seems.
Post 387 and 396 Nat talks about how Luffy isn't guaranteed to be a good role. Now, that seems to be the truth, but at the time she said it, it could have been something to strike up paranoia. Looking back at that comment now, kind of weird that she was right so early.
Post 427 once again is cool with Enryu over very little I think.
Post 473 is kind of pingy as well, because I just hosted a game where Ali was indie, an he was pretty excited. Albeit scum and indie are different, feels like a stretch of potential meta to paint Ali in a bad light.
There's quite a few posts where Nat really focuses on Adam and him dropping his PR. Now, I know that was hella suss of Adam, but I've explained my thoughts on him already and think he's probably an Exe hunting for Luffy and has TMI on it. I feel like Nat's focus on Adam here was a safe place for her to look like she was contributing when she really wasn't.
I think with Nat's focus on Adam, and here quick call out of the WU being fake in post 773, there stands a decent chance it was Nat who tried to frame Adam. With Nat doubling down quickly after and voting Adam in post 781, it doesn't sit well with me. Really seemed like the smear job was by Nat.
The smear feels bad as well when you consider that after all of this suss on Adam, in post 828, Nat says she'd be fine with a Fuji vote as well despite no conversation about him.
Triples down on Adam in post 857 saying to just vote him out. This seems like she's convinced despite offering up Fuji's head thirty posts ago.
Overall, there's enough in Nat's game that I don't like and I think she deserves a look at and some pressure next day.
This is a terrible read list. His entire read on Fuji is a reiteration and an amalgamation of various posts stitched together. He also says that Adam and Fuji are contradicting each other, and previously mentions that Adam might be an indie. Yet, he proposes a CFD next on me here:
On a player he already claims that another player (Adam) is contradicting. So his entire read of Fuji just reads fake because he's literally asking a player whose claim with Adam should be resolved, to follow him on a CFD.
His read on Nick is completely arbitrary. Like it tells us absolutely nothing about Nick right now according to Dest, and it feels like he mentioned him just cause he was asked.
Coming to my own read, my reaction to Ekko felt fake. Kek. He doesn't substantiate further, and it's rich coming from you that you haven't seen any game solving when you were busy posting Ramsay gifs at the beginning. I have been game solving, I have been asking around, I don't know if you missed my posts, or are blatantly omitting them.
I do not agree with these reads.
On a player he already claims that another player (Adam) is contradicting. So his entire read of Fuji just reads fake because he's literally asking a player whose claim with Adam should be resolved, to follow him on a CFD.
His read on Nick is completely arbitrary. Like it tells us absolutely nothing about Nick right now according to Dest, and it feels like he mentioned him just cause he was asked.
Coming to my own read, my reaction to Ekko felt fake. Kek. He doesn't substantiate further, and it's rich coming from you that you haven't seen any game solving when you were busy posting Ramsay gifs at the beginning. I have been game solving, I have been asking around, I don't know if you missed my posts, or are blatantly omitting them.
I do not agree with these reads.
I think I know his chara, then. Thing is, this could also be a fake claim 
.
.
i didnt ask for a claim.
I asked for either a claim or good reason to why you voted me and lind.
Big difference.
I asked for either a claim or good reason to why you voted me and lind.
Big difference.
1. Because it was suspious you happened to vote two people without actually giving any reason for it,
2, you are still not giving reaons for why you voted both me and lind but instead you are saying beacuse ekko this and because ratchet that i want to hear what case you had against me and lind when you voted me or lind.
2, you are still not giving reaons for why you voted both me and lind but instead you are saying beacuse ekko this and because ratchet that i want to hear what case you had against me and lind when you voted me or lind.
- Status