Who will be the next Strawhat


  • Total voters
    895
Status
Not open for further replies.
I can give you that. I don't try to explain my concepts, because I think that you wouldn't listen most of the time. So.. it's the same anyway for me. The principle of an injonction is that I don't need to explain.

When someone say something and the story proves it wrong, I'm not the one who need to explain why it's wrong, the other person needs to convince me that they are right. That's the magic of the burden of proof.
No, that's backwards. Because we're telling you what literally happened on panel. You are peddling theories about how the story will go differently from what is presented and Oda is using misdirection. The burden of proof is on you to explain why your theories are correct.
 
No, that's backwards. Because we're telling you what literally happened on panel. You are peddling theories about how the story will go differently from what is presented and Oda is using misdirection. The burden of proof is on you to explain why your theories are correct.
I'm sorry ?
Who is trying to avoid what is on panel :

- Carrot being at a crewmate's job. Something others character NEVER achieved beside the strawhat and her mentor..

Your (as a group) response : But the look out job is not a real job

- Carrot being introduced and written like a strawhat in each panel she is in

Your response : Carrot is irrelevant

I'm not the one who is avoiding the burden of proof, you are. I'm not avoiding any panel of the story, even for Yamato. But you ARE.

You are all avoiding the story because it fits your world view where Yamato is the next most probable strawhat.. Spoiler:


It's just an illusion.
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry ?
Who is trying to avoid what is on panel :

- Carrot being at a crewmate's job. Something others character NEVER achieved beside the strawhat..

Your (as a group) response : But the look out job is not a real job

- Carrot being introduced and written like a strawhat in each panel she is in

Your response : Carrot is irrelevant

I'm not the one who is avoiding the burden of proof, you are. I'm not avoiding any panel of the story, even for Yamato. But you ARE.

You are all avoiding the story because it fits your world view where Yamato is the next most probable strawhat.. Spoiler:


It's just an illusion.
This is a bad faith argument. Even you admit that the story is clearly trying to make us think that Yamato will join the crew. You argue that she is actually just a red herring. The burden of proof is on you to show that.
 
This is a bad faith argument. Even you admit that the story is clearly trying to make us think that Yamato will join the crew. You argue that she is actually just a red herring. The burden of proof is on you to show that.
Yes, because I have a method: It's called storytelling. Like science is the method to best understand the reality, the Storytelling method is the best method to make you understand a story without bias.

Yamato is (at the present moment) most probably a decoy. This is shown by her interaction with Luffy and the way Oda is slowly hyping up a new crewmate. The narration is clear. I don't have to explain it.
 
Yes, because I have a method: It's called storytelling. Like science is the method to best understand the reality, the Storytelling method is the best method to make you understand a story without bias.

Yamato is (at the present moment) most probably a decoy. This is shown by her interaction with Luffy and the way Oda is slowly hyping up a new crewmate. The narration is clear. I don't have to explain it.
Do you really not see how the burden of proof is on you with a statement like this?
 
I gave you evidences, you just ignored them. And will continue to even if I give you more.. that's how it work here ^^
I never ignored your "evidence". Like we've said, you usually just say "wrong", "that's a bad faith argument", "you're not looking at the story right" and stuff like that. And everytime we call you out on it, you just claim that you presented evidence and we ignored it, even though all you give is general statements.
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
So lemme get this straight:

-He says character tools like consistency, development, good interaction, thematic value etc. isn't needed for Carrot, essentially saying Carrot isn't a good character.

-He constantly says to wait aka Carrot doesn't have anything right now

-He says the story and evidence is pointing towards Yamato, but as a red herring for Carrot.

-He himself says his theories are just assumptions

But claims that anyone who doesn't believe his self-admitted assumptions that lack current evidence must hate him or Carrot?
 
So lemme get this straight:

-He says character tools like consistency, development, good interaction, thematic value etc. isn't needed for Carrot, essentially saying Carrot isn't a good character.

-He constantly says to wait aka Carrot doesn't have anything right now

-He says the story and evidence is pointing towards Yamato, but as a red herring for Carrot.

-He himself says his theories are just assumptions

But claims that anyone who doesn't believe his self-admitted assumptions that lack current evidence must hate him or Carrot?
Yes
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top