It's done. A man with a supreme grade sword and no DF to compensate for.
"But Whitebeard had a top tier DF. How does Roger compensate?"
-> with high level of swordsmanship which goes way beyond what Whitebeard can to with his Bisento.
Shanks too doesn't have a DF, even lost an arm, yet competes with mastery of his blade. Wouldn't be surprised if Roger could just cut through Gura's shockwaves.
"But Whitebeard had a top tier DF. How does Roger compensate?"
-> with high level of swordsmanship which goes way beyond what Whitebeard can to with his Bisento.
Shanks too doesn't have a DF, even lost an arm, yet competes with mastery of his blade. Wouldn't be surprised if Roger could just cut through Gura's shockwaves.
then by your definition
there are only two swordsmen in the series sir?
did oden focus on swordsmanship alone as his path
the scabbards? did they share that as an ambition?
are they swordsmen?
I dont think you understand you get that exposition with zoro and swordsmanship because he is infact a main character and by extension mihawk because thats what his end goal is.
Again swordsmen are not defined by being able to forge a black blade.no sane person here is arguing Mihawk > roger but excluding them because they didn’t forge one is rubbish.
Here are undeniable facts
1. That mihawk challenged sword masters in the verse until there was no more worthy challenger.
2. that shanks was his last rival leading to multiple duels between the two.
3. that shanks lost an arm and mihawk deemed him no longer a worthy challenger.
whether he forged a black blade or not, it’s clear to mihawk and to anyone else, he is a swordsman.
there are only two swordsmen in the series sir?
did oden focus on swordsmanship alone as his path
the scabbards? did they share that as an ambition?
are they swordsmen?
I dont think you understand you get that exposition with zoro and swordsmanship because he is infact a main character and by extension mihawk because thats what his end goal is.
Post automatically merged:
Again swordsmen are not defined by being able to forge a black blade.no sane person here is arguing Mihawk > roger but excluding them because they didn’t forge one is rubbish.
Here are undeniable facts
1. That mihawk challenged sword masters in the verse until there was no more worthy challenger.
2. that shanks was his last rival leading to multiple duels between the two.
3. that shanks lost an arm and mihawk deemed him no longer a worthy challenger.
whether he forged a black blade or not, it’s clear to mihawk and to anyone else, he is a swordsman.
Last edited:
